Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

ACLU Suing City Over Pershing Square Photography Ban

PershingSquare_ACLUSuit_MainAsset.jpg
(Photo by Hunter Kerhart via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The American Civil Liberties Union and 12 other organizations are moving forward with a lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles for a ban on photography and the distribution of flyers at the Pershing Square summer concert series—restrictions the organizations have deemed unconstitutional. The Pershing Square Downtown Stage is a free concert series held at the public park from July 8 through August 27, and this year's line-up has included acts like The Wallflowers and the B-52s.

"At the request of the artist/performer, video, photo and audio devices are prohibited at Pershing Square’s Downtown Stage Saturday concerts," the concert series' website initially stated, notes a letter by the ACLU of Southern California that was addressed to the City of L.A. "This includes Pro cameras, monopods, tripods, selfie sticks, iPads or professional photography/video equipment of any type. This policy will be strictly enforced due to contractual agreement."

According to the letter, a second restriction bans the distribution of flyers: "The distribution of promotional items, flyers or printed materials is not permitted without written permission of Pershing Square. The sampling and distribution of products is prohibited without a venue permit."

These restrictions were brought to the attention of the ACLU when Cliff Cheng, a photographer for the Los Angeles Collegian, Los Angeles City College's campus newspaper, attempted to secure press credential for the series, notes PetaPixel. When he was denied, he turned to the civil rights organization.

"Cheng asked the American Civil Liberties Union - Southern Calif., if it was Constitutional for the government to give up the free speech rights of its citizens and the news media to a private corporation?" a release by the photographer states, according to PetaPixel. "ACLU replied it was not Constitutional and wrote the enclosed letter to LA City asking it to comply with the Constitution."

The August 3rd letter—sent to L.A. City Attorney Mike Feuer and L.A. City Department of Parks and Recreation General Manager Michael Shull—gave the city 10 days to respond. It was written by Peter J. Eliasberg, chief counsel at ACLU SoCal.

"Because Pershing Square is a public forum, any restrictions on First Amendment activities there must be content-neutral, reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions," Eliasberg writes in the letter. "The existing policies providing for a total ban on photography/videography and an arbitrary permitting scheme for circulating pamphlets at the Downtown Stage Summer Concert Series are facially unconstitutional…"

Sponsored message

The concert series' website has since been updated, with photography restrictions now limited to "[f]lash photography, professional camera or recording equipment (including cameras with detachable lenses and any form of camera stand) and laser pointers…" The ban on flyers still stands.

Rose Watson, a spokeswoman for the Department of Parks and Recreation, told the Los Angeles Times that the ban on professional photography remains because “[s]pace is so tight, bumper to bumper, wall to wall,” that photographers will have to make do without flash and with smaller cameras.

“If there are legitimate fears that the crowd is so large that it is dangerous, the appropriate response is to limit the overall crowd size, not ban photographers,” Mickey Osterreicher, general counsel for the ACLU, responded to the Times.

The suit is seeking a court injunction to end the bans.

"The City Attorney's office is currently is looking into the claims contained in the [ACLU's] letter and is working with the department on a prompt response," Frank T. Mateljan III, Deputy Director for the City's Attorney's Office, said in an email sent to LAist on August 8.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today