Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
1 In 5 Metro Riders Say They've Been Sexually Harassed In Past Month
Riding the Metro (Photo by Gary Kavanagh via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
()
A new survey out by Metro this week asks riders about sexual harassment, and the results, while not surprising, aren't good: about one out of every five riders say that they've been sexually harassed in the past month.
Metro routinely surveys its riders about to find out more about their background (income, gender and race) and whether they feel like their rides are safe, happy and clean. They try to make sure they're getting a good cross-section of rider from the vast majority of the weekday lines. This time Metro asked its riders about sexual harassment.
The survey asks, "In the past month while riding Metro, have you felt unsafe due to unwanted touching, exposure, comments, or any other form of unwanted sexual behavior?" 18% of bus riders answered "yes" along with 21% of train riders. The survey also asked whether riders felt safe waiting for their bus or train to come: 87% of bus riders said "yes" and 84% of train riders said "yes."
This isn't a huge shock, but it is distressing to read the cold, hard data backing up the anecdotal evidence. We've surveyed our own readers to tell their tales of harassment and coping strategies on public transportation. The stories are awful, but worse might be that some victims have said that other riders and even Metro employees turned a blind eye to harassment. Sexual harassment is certainly not an issue limited to public transportation, but Metro should take these responses seriously. (Metro is soliciting comments here.)
Support for LAist comes from
The survey wasn't all bad news. It's a little hard to tell based on the graphic below, but it looks like more than 80% riders said they were overall happy with their Metro service—and train riders seem to be a happier than bus riders. And Metro says that over time it has seen a clear trend toward riders who take Metro because they want to—not because they have to:
Overall, Metro bus and rail riders both saw slight increases in median income, as well as a decrease in the percent of riders below the poverty line. This was coupled with a decrease in car ownership for both bus and rail riders, as well as a decrease in the percentage of people who either drove to their first Metro stop/station or were dropped off there. Although income and car ownership have, historically speaking, been positively related, that relationship may be weaker today than in the past. This could possibly be due to a nationwide movement of young adults choosing to forgo the added costs, parking burdens, and risks of owning an automobile.
You can check out the results from the entire survey here:
()
Survey (Metro)
You can find results from past surveys published in October 2013, September 2012 and January 2012.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance. -
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
Best of LAist