With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
California NAACP Opposes Measure To Raise Commercial Property Taxes To Benefit Schools

A measure on the November ballot aims to raise as much as $11.5 billion for schools and local governments in California by changing property tax rules for businesses.
Backers of Prop. 15 say it’ll help underfunded schools in disadvantaged communities. But some minority advocacy groups are opposing the measure, saying it could hurt small Black-owned businesses.
Using images of a Black-owned barbershop, a TV ad from the No On Prop. 15 campaign quotes the California chapter of the NAACP in saying the measure would hurt small business.
“As higher property taxes push our costs up, family businesses will go under,” the narrator says in the ad.
Campaign finance disclosures show that business groups, taxpayers associations and owners of large office buildings are leading the charge against Prop 15.
But groups such as the California NAACP and the California Black Chamber of Commerce have also come out against it, breaking with elected officials and education funding advocates who say Prop. 15 would benefit Black communities.
USC political science professor Ange-Marie Hancock Alfaro said one explanation for the split could be a generation gap between different constituencies.
“The NAACP in the state of California tends to represent older voters, who tend not to have children in public education right now,” she said.
(State and local chapters of the NAACP operate independently of the national organization.)
Prop. 15 exempts businesses with property worth $3 million or less. But opponents say small businesses could eventually be impacted if property owners respond to tax hikes by raising rents.
The measure would not affect property taxes paid by homeowners. It would create a so-called “split roll,” with one set of tax rules for residential properties and another for commercial and industrial properties.
However, the reform would dismantle aspects of Prop. 13, the landmark tax law passed by California voters more than 40 years ago. Prop. 13 is often called the “third rail” of California politics — and political experts say it’s a rail that could split voters in unexpected ways.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.
-
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.