Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Public documents reveal ongoing dispute
    A large concrete bridge arching over a paved street on a clear, sunny day. A palm tree is in the forefront on the right, and a large pillar is on the left.
    The LAX Automated People Mover project was originally slated to open in 2023.
    An ongoing dispute over maintenance of parts of the system that powers the LAX Automated People Mover could be the reason the long-awaited train won’t open until next summer, or even later, according to public documents reviewed by LAist.

    More on the dispute: Power was partially shut off to the train between February and July 2025 so the contractor could repair faulty equipment in a metering cabinet used to measure how electricity is distributed throughout the system. The power shut-off reportedly delayed critical testing.

    Public documents provide more insight: In October, LAist reported about how the train’s estimated completion date moved from early 2026 to next summer. The dispute detailed in public documents about the project offer a more specific reason for the delay, which was previously opaque.

    Status of the Automated People Mover: In a statement, Los Angeles World Airports said it’s not "unusual" to see “contractual disputes” on large capital projects like the Automated People Mover and that the train is still on schedule to open to the public next summer. Construction on the project is nearly complete, and most of the current work is focused on testing and ensuring all the parts of the system work together.

    Read on … to learn more about what LAist uncovered about the latest issue embroiling the city agency responsible for LAX and its contractor.

    An ongoing dispute over maintenance of parts of the system that powers the LAX Automated People Mover could be the reason the long-awaited train won’t open until next summer, or even later, according to public documents reviewed by LAist.

    The current dispute adds to a long series of disagreements between the city and LINXS, the group of companies contracted to design, build and operate the train, that have led to the ongoing saga of delays, hundreds of millions in cost overruns and diminishing public confidence that there’ll ever be a rail-only connection to LAX.

    An L.A. County Civil Grand Jury report released earlier this year claimed that LINXS has used the dispute resolution process and “political pressures” to force contract extensions and additional compensation throughout the design and construction process.

    In October, LAist reported about how the train’s estimated completion date moved from early 2026 to next summer. The dispute detailed in the public documents offers a more specific reason for the delay, which was previously opaque.

    Dispute over metering cabinet equipment

    In February, staff from city agencies directed LINXS to repair faulty equipment in a metering cabinet, according to a summary of the dispute and findings by a third-party evaluator. While the type of equipment isn’t specified, it’s likely related to measuring the power distributed throughout the system.

    Power was partially shut down during the period of repair work, which lasted until July 2025.

    That power shut-off delayed critical testing of the technology that allows for central control of the train’s systems, according to the third-party evaluator.

    The third-party evaluator’s report said LINXS argued it was not required by contract to perform the repair work and is entitled to a schedule extension and compensation. The third-party evaluator, whose recommendations are not legally binding, agreed with LINXS’ position.

    Los Angeles World Airports, the agency that manages LAX and the Van Nuys Airport, did not participate in an August hearing regarding the dispute, the third-party evaluator’s findings said.

    The agency “rejected” the third-party evaluator’s conclusions, according to a November report from a management consulting firm retained by project lenders to monitor project progress.

    What happens next?

    According to the project contract, if a dispute remains unresolved after inquiring with the third-party evaluator, the next step is for LINXS to file a claim under a section of state law that governs complaints against public entities.

    A section on the California Tort Claims Act on the Sacramento County Public Law Library website notes that the claim is a required precursor to any civil action.

    “Filing a claim gives the agency the opportunity to settle the claim before a lawsuit is filed and to investigate the claim so that it can properly defend itself, or to correct the conditions or practices that led to the claim,” the website states.

    The management consulting firm’s November report notes that LINXS “formally submitted” a claim on Oct. 21, triggering a 60-day period for the city to “respond to the claim and sets out the basis for the LINXS entitlements to relief.”

    “Submission of [the] claim was explicitly requested by [Los Angeles World Airports] as a precursor to negotiation,” the report continues.

    The status of the Automated People Mover

    In a statement, Los Angeles World Airports said it’s not "unusual" to see "contractual disputes" on large capital projects like the Automated People Mover and that the train is still on schedule to open to the public next summer.

    “LINXS continues to assure us the train will be ready for the FIFA World Cup, but we have back up plans in place to ensure an outstanding experience for all fans who visit Los Angeles,” the statement added. “[Los Angeles World Airports] does not comment on pending legal matters.”

    Where did LAist find these documents?

    LAist found the documents on a website that tracks municipal securities called Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA). To find the page relevant to the Automated People Mover, head to emma.msrb.org. Then, in the search box on the upper righthand corner, search for 13048VBA5. This CUSIP number as it is known uniquely identifies the $1.2 billion in bonds that the California Municipal Finance Authority provided for the Automated People Mover. Halfway down the page, select the “Disclosure Documents” tab, and you’ll see a list of documents, including the third-party evaluator’s findings, as well as the monthly reports from LINXS and the management consulting firm.

    Construction on the project is nearly complete, and most of the current work is focused on testing and ensuring all the parts of the system work together.

    In November, Fluor, one of the companies that makes up LINXS, reported to investors that they can expect the Automated People Mover to “reach substantial completion over [the] next 3 quarters.”

    The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, which was also named in the documents about the dispute, declined to comment.

    LAist also reached out to LINXS and the companies that make up the group, but did not receive any response.

    The management consulting firm also did not respond to emails requesting an interview.

    Do you know something about the Automated People Mover that LAist should look into?

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

  • Lead singer of The Mavericks died Monday

    Topline:

    Raul Malo, the leader of the country band The Mavericks and one of the most recognizable voices in roots music, died Monday night, according to a representative of the band. The guitarist and singer had been battling cancer.

    Why it matters: Over a career that lasted four decades, The Mavericks lived up to the band's name, challenging expectations and following a roadmap crafted by Malo's expansive musical upbringing as the son of Cuban immigrants in Miami.

    Why now: He was hospitalized last week, forcing him to miss tribute shows staged in his honor at the Ryman Auditorium over the weekend. He was 60 years old.

    Raul Malo, the leader of the country band The Mavericks and one of the most recognizable voices in roots music, died Monday night, according to a representative of the band. The guitarist and singer had been battling cancer.

    He was hospitalized last week, forcing him to miss tribute shows staged in his honor at the Ryman Auditorium over the weekend. He was 60 years old.

    "No one embodied life and love, joy and passion, family, friends, music and adventure the way our beloved Raul did," read a statement released by his family.

    Malo's group, The Mavericks, mourned the loss of their leader in a social post.

    "Anyone with the pleasure of being in Raul's orbit knew that he was a force of human nature, with an infectious energy," the statement read. "Over a career of more than three decades entertaining millions around the globe, his towering creative contributions and unrivaled, generational talent created the kind of multicultural American music reaching far beyond America itself."

    Over a career that lasted four decades, The Mavericks lived up to the band's name, challenging expectations and following a roadmap crafted by Malo's expansive musical upbringing as the son of Cuban immigrants in Miami.

    "I grew up in a very musical household. There was all kinds of music around always," he told WHYY's Fresh Air in 1995. "We listened to everything from Hank Williams to Celia Cruz to Sam Cooke to Bobby Darin. It didn't matter."

    In 1992, Malo told NPR that his widespread influences weren't always understood or appreciated in his South Florida hometown, but he said that his struggle to fit in taught him to trust his instincts. Malo had become the guitarist and lead singer for The Mavericks in 1989, alongside co-founders Robert Reynolds and Paul Deakin, and his roaring, sentimental voice defined the band's sound and remained its constant as the group's catalog moved from slow, tender ballads to full-throttle rock songs. In 1995, the band released its biggest hit with "All You Ever Do Is Bring Me Down," a swinging country song featuring an assist from Tex-Mex accordion legend Flaco Jimenez.

    As the band grew in members and devoted listeners, The Mavericks continued to push the boundaries of American music, weaving a richly layered tapestry of textures and stories. With more than a dozen studio albums, The Mavericks collected praise and recognition from the Academy of Country Music, the Country Music Association and the Recording Academy. Although they took a hiatus for several years, Malo never stopped making music — and returned to his bandmates with renewed inspiration.

    Following its 30th anniversary, the group released its first full-length Spanish album in 2020, aptly titled En Español. The record reimagined Latin standards and folklore-tinged popular tunes; it also made an implicit political statement about Latin music's contributions to American culture.

    "In our own little way, if we could get somebody that perhaps is on the fence on issues and hears us singing in Spanish and perhaps reminds them of the beautiful cultures that make up what this country is trying to be and what it should be, so be it," Malo told NPR at the time. "Yeah, I'm OK with that."

    The following year, the Americana Music Association recognized The Mavericks with the Trailblazer Award. In 2024, the band released its last studio album, Moon & Stars. The release coincided with news of Malo's cancer diagnosis, which he discussed openly with NPR's Ayesha Rascoe.

    Before being hospitalized last week, Malo had been scheduled to perform with The Mavericks at a pair of tribute concerts held this past weekend at the legendary Ryman Auditorium in Nashville. Over 30 artists, including Patty Griffin, Jim Lauderdale and Steve Earle, still gathered to pay tribute to Malo, with some of the proceeds of the night going to the cancer prevention organization Stand Up To Cancer.

    According to his spokesperson, though Malo was too ill to attend, the concert was streamed to his hospital room Friday night.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Max Huntsman issues criticism of Sheriff's Dept.
    Max Huntsman is a former prosecutor who became L.A. County's inspector general.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has mostly blocked efforts to investigate misconduct within its ranks, according to the county inspector general, who announced his retirement Tuesday after 12 years on the job.

    Why now: In an open letter, Max Huntsman cited examples of how the county has thwarted his efforts to watchdog the department, which in the past has been plagued by accusations that deputies use excessive force and lie on the job. Huntsman said one example is former Sheriff Alex Villanueva’s misuse of criminal enforcement powers to discredit critics, such as opening an investigation into former County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

    “My requests for investigation were rejected,” Huntsman’s letter reads. “Even after receiving an official subpoena, the Sheriff’s Department has failed to turn over records regarding the improper surveillance.”

    He added: “Sometimes members of the public wonder if frightening new surveillance techniques will be used for improper purposes under the guise of criminal investigation. Sadly, the answer is yes.”

    County response: Asked to respond, the Sheriff’s Department issued a statement saying it valued the office of the inspector general and all county oversight bodies and that it wished Huntsman and his family well in his retirement. The department said it “continues to make great strides in advancing the Department in a transparent manner.”

    LAist also reached out to the county CEO and county counsel for comment, but they declined.

    Read on ... for more information on Huntsman's letter.

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has mostly blocked efforts to investigate misconduct within its ranks, according to the county inspector general, who announced his retirement Tuesday after 12 years on the job.

    In an open letter, Max Huntsman cited examples of how the county has thwarted his efforts to watchdog the department, which in the past has been plagued with accusations that deputies use excessive force and lie on the job.

    Huntsman said one example is former Sheriff Alex Villanueva’s misuse of criminal enforcement powers to discredit critics, such as opening an investigation into former County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

    Villanueva was sheriff from 2018 to 2022.

    “My requests for investigation were rejected,” Huntsman’s letter reads. “Even after receiving an official subpoena, the Sheriff’s Department has failed to turn over records regarding the improper surveillance.”

    He added: “Sometimes members of the public wonder if frightening new surveillance techniques will be used for improper purposes under the guise of criminal investigation. Sadly, the answer is yes.”

    Before becoming inspector general in 2013, Huntsman, 60, was a deputy district attorney who specialized in public corruption. He told LAist on Tuesday that the inspector general job wasn’t something he wanted initially.

    “I didn’t want to go work for politicians,” he said. “But the need to provide some kind of independent reporting and analysis was significant.”

    The Sheriff’s Department issued a statement saying it valued the Office of the Inspector General and all county oversight bodies and that it wished Huntsman and his family well in his retirement.

    The department said it “continues to make great strides in advancing the department in a transparent manner.”

    LAist also reached out to the county CEO and county counsel for comment, but they declined.

    After George Floyd

    In the letter, Huntsman says the state of California has come a long way in strengthening the power of local law enforcement oversight bodies, in part because of the 2020 murder of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis.

    After widespread protests — and lobbying by Huntsman — the state provided authority to inspectors general to enforce subpoenas requiring law enforcement agencies to hand over documents and authorized external investigation of police misconduct, including deputy gang conduct.

    The Sheriff’s Department — backed by county lawyers — has resisted.

    “Los Angeles County may not follow those laws, but it will not be able to avoid them forever,” Huntsman wrote. “The county refuses to require the photographing of suspected gang tattoos in secretive groups that the undersheriff has identified as violating state law.”

    “Just a few weeks ago, we requested some information regarding an investigation, and a pair of commanders refused to give it to us,” Huntsman said in an interview with LAist.

    Origin of the office 

    The Inspector General’s Office was created by the county Board of Supervisors in 2013 in response to a scandal that included former Sheriff Lee Baca covering up the abuses of jail inmates.

    Baca went to federal prison.

    Since then, the office has issued dozens of reports with recommendations for improving living conditions inside jails that some have described as “filthy,” stopping abuses of juveniles inside juvenile halls and providing shower privacy for inmates as part of the requirements under the Prison Rape Elimination Act.

    “All of these abuses were reported by the Office of Inspector General and recommendations were ignored,” Huntsman wrote. Often, it took court orders to enact change.

    “When we first blew the whistle on the torturous chaining of mentally ill prisoners to benches for 36 hours at a time, it was only a court order that ended the practice,” he wrote. “Time and time again, this pattern repeated itself.”

    Huntsman wrote the county has permitted the Sheriff’s Department to block oversight and defunded the Office of Inspector General by removing a third of its staff.

    “It's not surprising the county has driven out two successive chairs of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission,” he wrote.

    “Government always claims to value transparency and accountability, but shooting the messenger is still the most common response to criticism,” Huntsman wrote.

    Despite setbacks, Huntsman values work 

    Huntsman told LAist on Tuesday that he was proud of his career as a public servant.

    “I’ve really enjoyed the work and I’m sad to have it end,” he said.

    It’s a sentiment he echoed in his letter, adding that despite the setbacks and roadblocks, he was proud of the people with whom he shared the office.

    “It has been my honor to work with a talented, brave and tireless group of public servants to ensure that the public knows what its government is doing,” he wrote.

    He noted the inspector general’s reports are fact-checked by the office and public.

    “When government abuses occur, they are sometimes kept secret, but that is no longer the case for much of what is happening in Los Angeles County,” Huntsman wrote. “What you do about it is up to you.,”

    Huntsman’s last day is Friday.

  • The move is meant to help clear city streets
    A person wearing a yellow safety shirt and black pants unloads an RV with an X on its side off a tow truck.
    In a 12-to-3 vote, the L.A. City Council is moving forward to implement AB 630, a state law that allows abandoned or inoperable RVs worth less than $4,000 to be destroyed.

    Topline:

    The L.A City Council voted 12-3 today to implement a state law that will make it easier to clear some RVs from city streets.

    The backstory: Last month, the council's Transportation Committee voted to bring a proposal before the council to implement a policy change that allows the city to impound and immediately destroy abandoned or inoperable RV's worth less than $4,000. The change is inspired by new state law AB 630 that was created to prevent previously impounded RV's from ending back up on the street.

    The motion, authored by Councilmember Traci Park, reports that abandoned RV's pose as public and safety hazards.

    What's next: Councilmember Nithya Raman requested that an implementation plan be presented to the council's public safety and housing and homelessness committees.

    Go deeper: L.A. pushes policy to make it easier to remove RVs from city streets.

    Topline:

    The L.A City Council voted 12-3 today to implement a state law that will make it easier to clear some RVs from city streets.

    The backstory: Last month, the council's Transportation Committee voted to bring a proposal forward to implement a policy change that allows the city to impound and immediately destroy abandoned or inoperable RVs worth less than $4,000. The change is inspired by new state law AB 630, which was created to prevent previously impounded RVs from ending back up on the street.

    The motion, authored by Councilmember Traci Park, reports that abandoned RVs pose as public and safety hazards.

    What's next: Councilmember Nithya Raman requested that an implementation plan be presented to the council's public safety and housing and homelessness committees.

    Go deeper: L.A. pushes policy to make it easier to remove RVs from city streets.

  • Supes approve rule requiring police to show ID
    A group of people wearing camoflauge uniforms, helmets, face shields and black masks covering their faces are pictured at night
    A line of federal immigration agents wearing masks stands off with protesters near the Glass House Farms facility outside Camarillo on July 10.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors gave its final stamp of approval today to an ordinance requiring law enforcement to display visible identification and banning them from wearing face coverings when working in certain jurisdictions in L.A. County.

    Where it applies: The ordinance will take effect in unincorporated parts of the county. Those include East Los Angeles, South Whittier and Ladera Heights, where a Home Depot has been a repeated target of immigration raids, according to various reports.

    What the supervisors are saying:  “What the federal government is doing is causing extreme fear and chaos and anxiety, particularly among our immigrant community,” said Supervisor Janice Hahn, who introduced the motion, in an interview with LAist before the final vote. “They don't know who's dragging them out of a car. They don't know who's throwing them to the ground at a car wash because they act like secret police.”

    About the vote: Supervisor Lindsay Horvath was not present for the vote but coauthored the ordinance. Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstained. All other county supervisors voted to approve it.

    The back and forth: California passed a similar law, the No Secret Police Act, earlier this year. The Trump administration already is suing the state of California over that law, calling it unconstitutional. For her part, Hahn said that the law is meant to protect residents' constitutional rights, and that legal challenges won’t affect the county’s position “until we're told by a court that it's unconstitutional.”

    The timeline: The new law will go into effect in 30 days.