With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Fewer charter schools share LAUSD campuses, but tension remains

The number of Los Angeles Unified schools sharing space with charter schools has declined 43% in the last seven years. Next school year, 41 LAUSD schools will house an independently run charter school on their campus.
Though fewer charter schools are requesting space on district campuses than at any time in the last 15 years, the co-location policy continues to create tension between the district and charter school operators.
What does the law say?
California voters passed Proposition 39 in 2000, requiring school districts to provide “reasonably equivalent” facilities to charter school students.
Charter school advocates say LAUSD has long denied students access to space they are legally entitled to and have filed several lawsuits. Some parents and traditional public school educators say sharing their campus deprives their students of resources.
-
Who’s in charge? An independent nonprofit organization with an un-elected board. Some charter schools are affiliated with public districts.
-
Who funds them? Taxpayers. Charter schools are publicly funded.
-
Is there tuition? No.
-
What makes them different from regular public schools? Charter schools are exempt from many laws that govern public education.
How does co-location work?
Every fall, charter school operators can request to rent space in LAUSD schools based on their expected attendance the following school year.
District officials consider a list of matching guidelines that essentially try to answer the question: How can the district accommodate a charter school without disrupting existing programs and keeping students safe?
The district offers the charter space in the spring and they can choose to accept the offer, find an alternative agreement with the district, or reject the offer and find space elsewhere. In some cases, a single charter school is split across multiple campuses.
District staff presented an update on co-locations for the upcoming school year at a May 29 charter committee meeting.

The district’s charter schools operations manager Jeanette Borden said that shrinking enrollment, charter school closures and alternative school locations are driving the decline in co-locations.
Borden told the board the district’s charter school website is open to the public with details on the facilities requests, preliminary proposals, final offers and alternative agreements.
LAist visited the website and found that some of that information was missing, including the final offers that would show where some charter schools would be located in the 2025-26 school year. LAist asked LAUSD to provide this information but was told to file a Public Records Act request. According to California public records law, the email requesting the information is sufficient.
As of Thursday afternoon, the information had not been provided.
-
- 38 school submitted a request.
- 1 school withdrew its request.
- 1 school was ineligible because it did not yet have an operative charter.
- 24 schools accepted a final offer.
- 1 school declined the final offer.
- 14 schools signed an alternative agreement.
Source: Los Angeles Unified School District Charter School Committee presentation and website.
A history of tension
In February 2024, the LAUSD board approved a policy that steers charter schools away from some campuses.
“It's to create criteria that protect innovative programs and minimize the harm that colocation is doing to our most vulnerable students and schools,” said then-board president Jackie Goldberg in explaining the policy.
Months later the California Charter School Association filed a lawsuit seeking to rescind the policy. A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge is expected to issue a ruling later this month.
LAist asked the district whether the new policy affected where schools were offered space. A district spokesperson said in a statement that “Los Angeles Unified can't comment on pending or ongoing litigation.”
The California Charter School Association contends the district’s policy has pushed schools away.
Keith Dell'Aquila, the organization’s vice president of local advocacy in the Los Angeles region, said one school was offered space at two campuses more than 10 miles apart, but declined to name the school.
“Schools won't wait around for L.A. Unified to do the right thing,” Dell’Aquila said. “So they found other solutions that worked for their kids.”
Speak up
-
LAUSD board members can amplify concerns from parents, students and educators. Find your representative below.
-
District 1: Map, includes Mid City, parts of South L.A.
Board member: Sherlett Hendy Newbill
Email: BoardDistrict1@lausd.netCall: (213) 241-6382 (central office); (323) 298-3411 (field office)
-
District 2: Map, includes Downtown, East L.A.
Board member: Rocío Rivas
Email: rocio.rivas@lausd.net
Call: (213) 241-6020 -
District 3: Map, includes West San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood
Board member: Scott Schmerelson
Email: scott.schmerelson@lausd.net
Call: (213) 241-8333 -
District 4: Map, includes West Hollywood, some beach cities
Board member: Nick Melvoin
Email: nick.melvoin@lausd.net
Call: (213) 241-6387 -
District 5: Map, includes parts of Northeast and Southwest L.A.
Board Member: Karla Griego
Email: district5@lausd.net
Call: (213) 241-1000 -
District 6: Map, includes East San Fernando Valley
Board Member: Kelly Gonez
Email: kelly.gonez@lausd.net
Call: (213) 241-6388 -
District 7: Map, includes South L.A., and parts of the South Bay
Board Member: Tanya Ortiz Franklin
Email: tanya.franklin@lausd.net
Call: (213) 241-6385
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”
-
While working for the county, the DA’s office alleges that 13 employees fraudulently filed for unemployment, claiming to earn less than $600 a week.
-
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to declare immigration enforcement actions a local emergency.
-
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues.
-
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week.
-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.