Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Detours plague already polluted neighborhoods
    An empty stretch of elevated freeway. The Los Angeles city skyline rises in the background.
    An aerial picture taken on November 13, 2023 shows the 10 freeway after a large fire led to the shutdown of the section between the East L.A. interchange and Alameda Street.

    Topline:

    A mile-long section of the 10 Freeway near downtown is likely weeks from reopening after a weekend fire. The consensus seems to be that while traffic is worse than usual, it isn’t apocalyptic.

    How bad is it, really: On Monday there was a 15% traffic increase on city streets near the closure. On Tuesday, the detour routes, which include portions of the 101, and 110, saw 26% more drivers than normal, said Los Angeles Department of Transportation General Manager Laura Rubio-Cornejo at a Wednesday morning press conference.

    Where people are driving instead: L.A.’s gridlock-navigating veterans are filtering through a web of freeways and surface streets criss-crossing the impacted area. “If one piece of our network goes down, there's a lot of opportunities for people to make changes and move around those things,” said Brian Taylor, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at UCLA.

    Traffic is still bad for your health: The 10 detours are pushing more cars into freeway-adjacent neighborhoods that are already plagued by some of the worst air pollution in a city infamous for its smog.

    Listen 1:09
    LA Traffic Is Worse, But Not Terrible And It Probably Won’t Get Better

    A mile-long section of the 10 Freeway near downtown is likely weeks from reopening after a weekend fire. The consensus seems to be that while traffic is worse than usual, it isn’t apocalyptic.

    An estimated 300,000 drivers a day rely on the 10 between the East L.A. interchange and Alameda Street.

    On Monday there was a 15% traffic increase on city streets near the closure and on Tuesday, the detour routes, which include portions of the 101, and 110, saw 26% more drivers than normal, said Los Angeles Department of Transportation General Manager Laura Rubio-Cornejo at a Wednesday morning press conference.

    We’ve avoided “carmageddon” 3.0, in part because L.A.’s gridlock-navigating veterans are filtering through a web of freeways and surface streets criss-crossing the impacted area.

    “If one piece of our network goes down, there's a lot of opportunities for people to make changes and move around those things,” said Brian Taylor, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at UCLA. An unexpected shutdown of a roadway with fewer alternatives would likely be more disruptive.

    However, these temporary changes are pushing more cars into freeway-adjacent neighborhoods that are already plagued by some of the worst air pollution in a city infamous for its smog.

    Muffy works in Boyle Heights and called into LAist 89.3's public affairs radio show AirTalk on Monday.

    “We have terrible traffic here, anyway,” Muffy said. “I'm hoping that this incident is going to bring more attention to this community, which really needs a lot of attention because it's historically ignored, even though it's one of the oldest parts of the city.”

    The human cost of L.A.’s freeways

    Taylor compares downtown freeways to the spokes on a wheel— they radiate out from the city center.

    The goal, in part, was to make it easier for people to commute into and out of downtown, but that convenience came at a cost to past, and current residents.

    “The people who lived and worked adjacent to those freeways paid an outsized price of the noise and pollution,” Taylor said.

    Air pollution can harm pregnant people and their babies. Children who grow up breathing high levels of air pollution are more likely to develop asthma and long term exposure to air pollution is tied to increased rates of chronic respiratory issues, heart disease, and death.

    The people in the areas of Los Angeles with consistently higher levels of air pollution are often Black and Latino, and low income, in part because discriminatory 1930s housing policies made it difficult for people to buy homes in their neighborhoods.

    These communities are often breathing in pollutants they didn’t create, according to recent research from the University of Southern California.

    “We see whiter travelers, people who drive more, driving through communities where people drive less and are less white,” said Geoff Boeing, who co-authored the paper and is an assistant professor of urban planning and spatial analysis. And these commuters return home to neighborhoods that are less polluted than those they traverse.

    Historically, some of L.A. County’s whiter, wealthier communities, including South Pasadena, successfully blocked freeway expansion in their neighborhoods.

    Elected officials have repeatedly urged Angelenos to stay home and telecommute and if they must drive, to stick to established detours and avoid cutting through downtown neighborhoods.

    “Please remember that our downtown streets, particularly those around the impacted area, are some of our most congested corridors,” Rubio-Cornejo said Wednesday morning.

    The 5, 10, 60, and 101 freeways all intersect in Boyle Heights.

    "The surrounding neighborhoods are hit with the most impact since drivers are taking the streets where many of our students and their families reside," said Mendez High School teacher Rebecca Gallego. She thinks some students were late to class because of the influx of detouring drivers.

    St. Turibius Catholic School is downtown, blocks away from the now-closed section of the 10 Freeway.

    Principal Audrey Blanchette re-routed her morning drive from the 10 to Whittier Boulevard, and across the 6th Street Bridge to Central.

    “There's just a lot of big rigs on the regular streets that we usually see on the freeway,” Blanchette said.

    How and why drivers change course

    UCLA’s Taylor also studies travel behavior — the how and why of the ways we move through the world.

    “People adjust their behavior by changing their routes, changing the time of their travel, and changing the mode by which they travel, in that order,” Taylor said.

    That tracks with John Lewis, who’s been a bus driver in the Los Angeles Unified School District since 1989.

    “They'll let you know over the radio to avoid trouble areas, but with my experience of the city, I know how to get around,” Lewis said.

    Though he doesn’t regularly drive the 10, he said congestion tends to ripple out from wherever there's a big disruption. That’s another well-studied traffic phenomenon: adding more cars to the road doesn’t really impact any one of those vehicles until the thoroughfare fills up completely — “at which point things become very unstable,” Taylor said. See the sluggish snake of brake lights where cars previously zipped along.

    Lewis started his commute earlier this week to accommodate known construction projects and any potential residual traffic from downtown.

    “We typically try to route around freeways because they’re such parking lots in the morning,” Lewis said.

    The 10 Freeway closure altered about 3% of the Los Angeles Unified School District’s 1,300 bus routes Monday, according to Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. He said the average delay for students at 13 schools Monday was about 10 to 15 minutes.

    Will commuting changes stick?

    City officials have also urged would-be drivers to take the bus or Metro.

    L.A. Deputy Mayor of Infrastructure Randall Winston said at Wednesday's press conference that the E Line, which runs from Santa Monica to East L.A., saw a 10% increase in ridership the previous day.

    Taylor, who studied how drivers reacted to the Sepulveda Pass’s 2011 and 2012 construction closures, said it’s unlikely these changes will stick.

    “It becomes an opportunity to alert people that these options exist and that that can be a positive effect,” Taylor said. “But it's unlikely that the event itself … might cause people to reconsider their travel choices.”

    So when the 10 eventually re-opens, it’ll be back to our congested status quo.

  • How's your experience been?
    Around the country, state legislatures and school districts are looking at ways to keep cellphones from being a distraction in schools.
    Around the country, state legislatures and school districts are looking at ways to keep cellphones from being a distraction in schools.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles Unified School District’s cellphone ban turns 1 today.

    Flashback: The state’s largest district announced a “bell to bell” cellphone and social media ban in June 2024, which expanded the district’s existing phone ban to include lunch and passing periods.

    How it started: Over the first semester, we heard from educators and students who had mixed opinions. Some teachers reported positive results, while others said that passing periods remained a challenge. Some students found the ban stifled their ability to get important things done, and some also said their screentime stayed the same or increased while at home. We made a whole episode of our Imperfect Paradise podcast about it:

    Listen 46:11
    On February 18th, 2025, the Los Angeles Unified School District, the second largest public school district in the country, implemented an all-day cell phone ban for its students. Now that it’s the end of the school year, we head to Venice High School to see how the ban actually went.

    On February 18th, 2025, the Los Angeles Unified School District, the second largest public school district in the country, implemented an all-day cell phone ban for its students. Now that it’s the end of the school year, we head to Venice High School to see how the ban actually went.

    What we don’t know: Since LAUSD’s proposal went into effect, other districts have also rolled out changes to cellphone policies in advance of a July 2026 state deadline. The long-term effects are unclear, although more researchers are investigating.

    How’s it going? You tell us! Has it improved your educational experience? (Whether you’re a teacher, student, parent or caregiver.) Here’s a quick survey you can use to share your thoughts.

    Los Angeles Unified School District’s cell phone ban turns 1 year old today.

    The state’s largest district announced a “bell to bell” cellphone and social media ban in June 2024, which expanded the district’s existing phone ban to include lunch and passing periods. The policy took effect Feb. 18, 2025. District officials cited rising concerns about the effects of phones and social media on youth mental health, bullying and distraction from classroom instruction.

    How well did the ban go at the beginning?

    Over the first semester, we heard from educators and students who had mixed opinions. Some teachers reported positive results, while others said that passing periods remained a challenge. Some students found the ban stifled their ability to get important things done, and some also said their screentime stayed the same or increased while at home. We made a whole episode of our Imperfect Paradise podcast about it:

    Listen 46:11
    On February 18th, 2025, the Los Angeles Unified School District, the second largest public school district in the country, implemented an all-day cell phone ban for its students. We headed to Venice High School to see how the ban actually went.
    On February 18th, 2025, the Los Angeles Unified School District, the second largest public school district in the country, implemented an all-day cell phone ban for its students. We headed to Venice High School to see how the ban actually went.

    What don't we know?

    Since LAUSD’s proposal went into effect, other districts have also rolled out changes to cellphone policies in advance of a July 2026 state deadline. The long-term effects are unclear, although more researchers are investigating.

    How’s it going?

    You tell us! Has it improved your educational experience? (Whether you’re a teacher, student, parent or caregiver.) Here’s a quick survey you can use to share your thoughts.

  • City controller issues annual financial report
    A tall gray building with pink trees below. The photo is taken from an angle so the tall building is at an angle sticking out diagonally.
    Los Angeles City Hall

    Topline:

    Los Angeles remains on shaky financial ground with increased liability costs, overspending by city departments and revenue shortfalls forcing it to dip into its reserves, according to a financial report released Wednesday.

    The details: The annual report for the fiscal year that ended in June, from L.A. City Controller Kenneth Mejia, said the culmination of decades of “unstable budgeting,” is seen and felt by Angelenos across the city “in crumbling infrastructure and deteriorating services,”

    Jobs eliminated: Additionally, short-term budget balancing over the past two years resulted in unpaid furlough days for city employees and the elimination of thousands of unfilled positions.

    Liability spending: The top area of overspending continued to be liability payments. Liability claims exceeded the budget by $199 million or 228%, totaling a record of $287 million for the year. The top three areas include police at $152 million, street services at $44 million and transportation at $20 million. 

    Los Angeles remains on shaky financial ground with increased liability costs, overspending by city departments and revenue shortfalls forcing it to dip into its reserves, according to a financial report released Wednesday.

    The annual report for the fiscal year that ended in June, from Los Angeles City Controller Kenneth Mejia, said the culmination of decades of “unstable budgeting” is seen and felt by Angelenos across the city “in crumbling infrastructure and deteriorating services.”

    Additionally, short-term budget balancing over the past two years resulted in unpaid furlough days for city employees and the elimination of thousands of unfilled positions.

    “The service impacts of those cuts are still hitting departments as they struggle to address growing needs with severely diminished capacities,” the report read.

    Key takeaways

    Here are some of the major points made in the report:

    • The top area of overspending continued to be liability payments. Liability claims exceeded the budget by $199 million or 228%, totaling a record of $287 million for the year. The top three areas include police at $152 million, street services at $44 million and transportation at $20 million. 
    • The top area of underspending was capital improvement projects. The city only spent $25 million (19%) of the $131 million budget.
    • Salaries and employee benefits increased by $162.6 million (4.7%) compared to previous  years, primarily because of cost-of-living adjustments associated with labor agreements with civilian and sworn employee unions, sworn employee hiring, increased overtime usage and higher benefit and insurance premium costs. Property taxes, which represent 40.6% of general fund revenues, increased by 4.3%. Business tax revenue increased by 8.6%, while sales tax revenues declined by 2.2%
    • The city had to make up $160 million in revenue shortfall by tapping the reserve fund, which dropped from $648 million two fiscal years ago to $402 million for fiscal year 2024-25. The reserve fund currently sits at 5.06% of the total general fund budget, according to a December financial status report from the city administrative officer — barely above the 5% minimum set by the City Council.
    • Four ratings agencies, including S&P, Fitch, Moody’s and Kroll, have given the city a “negative outlook” over a variety of concerns including liability payments and damages from the Palisades Fire. A negative outlook indicates a heightened risk that a city’s credit rating may be downgraded within the next 12 to 18 months. L.A. still holds an Aa2 rating from Moody’s, which is considered a high grade.

    The controller issued a series of recommendations, including shifting to a two-year instead of one-year budgeting process, more realistic revenue projections, and more revenue generation by growing the tax base (for example: implementing a vacancy tax or taxing rideshare/autonomous vehicles, not just raising the sales tax).

    General fund challenges

    Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, a member of the city’s Budget and Finance Committee, said in the report that the city can’t keep relying on short-term fixes, while “structural deficits,” like ongoing budget shortfalls, grow.

    She added that “years of draining reserves, soaring liability payouts, and underinvestment in infrastructure have left us in a perilous financial position that our communities are now forced to absorb.”

    “We need transparent, multi-year budgeting rooted in long-term planning and fiscal responsibility,” Hernandez said.

    Mejia said that although the city is halfway through its fiscal year, it continues to have general fund budget challenges.

    “The current fiscal year’s budget assumes moderate revenue growth, however, the long-term impact of current economic activities on revenue growth remains unknown and revenue has been stable during the first half of the year.”

    LA’s demographics

    In addition to providing a financial picture, the report provided a demographic look at the city. L.A.’s population is 3.84 million, the average age is 37.5, the total school enrollment is 409,108 and the unemployment rate is 6%.

    The city employs more than 50,000 workers, the metro L.A.’s GDP is $1.3 trillion (among the top 20 economies in the world), and LAX has 75 million passengers a year.

  • Official statements complicate prosecution
    DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin, a woman with light skin tone, blonde hair, wearing a blue jacket, stands behind a wooden podium and speaks as two people stand and listen behind her.
    Statements by Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin and other federal officials have become an issue in a Southern California manslaughter case.

    Topline:

    Erroneous and politically charged statements by Trump administration officials, as well as the district attorney for San Bernardino County, have complicated the prosecution of a truck driver charged with vehicular manslaughter in a crash on the 10 Freeway last year.

    Statements by federal officials have ended up in court documents where attorneys representing the defendant argue the driver's prosecution has been tainted by anti-immigrant bias.

    What they said: Statements by the Department of Homeland Security labeled the driver a “criminal illegal alien” who was driving under the influence. The driver was seeking asylum and authorized to work in the U.S. by the federal government. Toxicology tests taken after the crash came back negative for all substances.

    Racial Justice Act claims: A public defender has argued that the driver has faced multiple violations of the California Racial Justice Act, a law passed in 2020 that prohibits state authorities from seeking convictions or imposing sentences based on race, ethnicity or national origin.

    Why it matters: It’s the latest in a series of instances where federal officials have injected politics into developing events. Arjun Sethi, a racial justice advocate, civil rights lawyer and adjunct professor at Georgetown University said these statements have compromised Singh’s ability to receive a fair trial.

    Read on ... for how local officials' statements have factored into the case.

    Erroneous and politically charged statements by Trump administration officials, as well as the district attorney for San Bernardino County, have complicated the prosecution of a truck driver charged with vehicular manslaughter in a crash on the 10 Freeway last year.

    The statements highlighted the national origin of the driver, 21-year-old Jashanpreet Singh, who was born in India, contained false information on his immigration status and made unfounded allegations that he was driving under the influence.

    It’s the latest in a series of instances where federal officials have injected politics into developing events. In some cases, statements by federal officials later turn out to be false and detrimental to prosecutions, as the New York Times recently found in at least four instances. Here in Southern California, statements by federal officials have ended up in court documents where Singh’s defense argues his prosecution has been tainted by anti-immigrant bias.

    Statements by the Department of Homeland Security labeled Singh a “criminal illegal alien” who was driving under the influence. Singh was seeking asylum and authorized to work in the U.S. by the federal government. Toxicology tests taken after the crash came back negative for all substances.

    “It is a terrible tragedy three innocent people lost their lives due to the reckless open border policies that allowed an illegal alien to be released into the U.S. and drive an 18-wheeler on America’s highways,” Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in an Oct. 23 statement.

    Arjun Sethi, a racial justice advocate, civil rights lawyer and adjunct professor at Georgetown University said these statements have compromised Singh’s ability to receive a fair trial.

    “When you think of the variety of federal statements in this case, you see blatant racial and xenophobic rhetoric that is highly prejudicial,” Sethi said. “How can any juror set aside that rhetoric … and be able to ascertain the truth?”

    Public defenders representing Singh argue similar statements by San Bernardino County District Attorney Jason Anderson, a deputy in Anderson’s office and the California Highway Patrol violate California's Racial Justice Act, a 2020 law prohibiting prosecutions influenced by racial bias.

    Hearings on the Racial Justice Act claims will continue March 10. Singh's trial will commence after a judge rules on those claims. Preet has pleaded not guilty to the felony charges against him.

    “I think authorities made statements infused by racial bias in this case,” Sethi, who has served as an expert in Racial Justice Act litigation, told LAist. “Bottom line, California authorities in this case mirror the racist political rhetoric we are hearing from the federal government.”

    How we got here 

    Six months before the crash that led to the charges against Singh, President Donald Trump took steps to restrict states from issuing commercial driver’s licenses to immigrants.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation issued new emergency regulations in September that CalMatters reported could revoke the licenses of up to 61,000 immigrant truck drivers, amounting to 8% of the total commercial licenses in the state.

    The department gave California 30 days to come into compliance with these new rules or risk losing millions of dollars in federal highway funds.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office disputed the Trump administration's claims, arguing that California’s licensed truck drivers had a lower fatal crash rate than the national average.

    Then, in the early afternoon of Oct. 21, Singh’s semi-truck crashed on a crowded interstate.

    Dashboard camera footage shows his truck colliding with passenger vehicles and another truck as one car went up in flames.

    Singh was arrested and held without bail. Prosecutors charged him with vehicular manslaughter and reckless driving.

    He was initially charged with driving under the influence, but the district attorney dropped those charges after toxicology reports came back negative for all substances.

    As a deputy district attorney said in a filing, the crash immediately “generated high media interest and touched off a federal and state official-driven debate surrounding immigration policy and the state's issuance of commercial driver's licenses.”

    Two days after the crash, the Department of Homeland Security published a news release arguing Singh, an asylum seeker, entered the country illegally in 2022 “and was RELEASED into the country under the Biden administration.”

    DHS officials have not responded to LAist’s requests for comment. McLaughlin will reportedly leave the agency soon.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation also issued a news release on Singh’s crash and California’s compliance with the new licensing rules. The release stated that Singh was operating his truck under the influence of drugs, despite a lack of evidence to support that claim.

    In an email to LAist, a Department of Transportation spokesperson said California issued Singh’s Commercial Drivers License without properly vetting his qualifications.

    Newsom’s press office directed LAist to the California Transportation Agency, which has yet to respond to emailed questions.

    But in an earlier statement on social media, Newsom’s office stated that the federal government approved and renewed Singh’s federal employment authorization multiple times, and it was that approval that allowed him to obtain a commercial driver’s license in California.

    Racial Justice Act claims

    Public defender Jason Tucker argued in an Oct. 31 filing that Singh, his client, has faced multiple violations of the California Racial Justice Act, a law passed in 2020 that prohibits state authorities from seeking convictions or imposing sentences based on race, ethnicity or national origin.

    Tucker has not responded to an emailed request for comment.

    The filing highlights a motion to increase bail written by a California Highway Patrol officer shortly after the crash that claimed Singh was subject to deportation, despite being an asylum seeker who was authorized to work in the U.S. by the federal government, and a comment by a deputy district attorney about Singh’s use of an interpreter in court.

    The primary violation, according to Tucker’s filing, occurred Oct. 23, when Anderson, the district attorney, issued a news release that tied the crash to state and federal policy.

    “Had the rule of law been followed by state and federal officials the defendant should have never been in California at all,” Anderson’s statement said, before adding that Anderson’s office would “aggressively prosecute” the case.

    According to the defense, this statement “injected Mr. Singh’s national origin, by way of his immigration status, into the criminal justice proceedings, despite evidence to the contrary.”

    The DA’s reply

    Deputy District Attorney Phillip Stemler, argued in a Nov. 10 court filing that the statements made by the office focus on policy without referencing or disparaging Singh’s identity, do not contain discriminatory language and do not meet the standards of a Racial Justice Act violation. Further, the district attorney is protected by the First Amendment, giving him latitude to speak on policy matters, according to the filing.

    Stemler’s response stated that the Oct. 21 crash that killed three people and injured several others in Ontario “touched off a debate” about immigration and truck driving but that it was not Anderson’s office who politicized the case.

    “It was federal officials who injected defendant’s immigration status into the media narrative on the defendant’s case,” reads the filing by Stemler, the Racial Justice Act coordinator for the office.

    First, the filing references an Oct. 22 social media post by Duffy stating that his department was withholding $40 million from California because the state did not comply with the new federal rules.

    “The following day, federal officials ramped up further,” the filing reads, pointing to the Oct. 23 DHS press release on the crash that referred to Singh as a “criminal illegal alien from India.”

    Stemler’s filing says that the California Racial Justice Act does not apply to federal officials.

    Sethi, the civil rights lawyer, said the statements by federal officials nevertheless compromise Singh’s ability to receive a fair trial.

    “Long before Mr. Singh ever sets foot in a courtroom, there is a long shadow of political theater and xenophobic rhetoric that will be cast over him,” Sethi said, “and his case that is the fault of state and federal officials.”

  • As raids continue, volunteers say they're needed
    Groceries are placed in a plastic box.
    Volunteers at a Koreatown church load up produce and other groceries to be delivered to immigrant families too scared to leave their homes amid the ongoing immigration raids.

    Topline:

    With fear keeping some immigrant families inside, a program to bring groceries directly to their doors is seeking to expand.

    The backstory: Grocery deliveries are being organized by a Koreatown church has seen a decline in attendance at its regular food distribution program in recent months. At the request of church leadership, The LA Local is not naming the church or its congregants out of privacy concerns and to avoid drawing attention to their immigrant community. It’s just one of a network of faith-based organizations responding to the need, and as raids show no signs of slowing down anytime soon, the group is seeking to expand its delivery hubs to more church sites.

    Immigration concerns: “There are members of our congregation that have immigration concerns that have told me they’re afraid to go out,” the pastor of the Koreatown church said. “I’ve spoken to at least four different families that are just afraid to go get groceries, are afraid to take their kids or their grandkids to school, and are worried about ICE activity in the neighborhood that’s been happening over the past seven months or so.”

    Read on... for more about how this church is looking for more support.

    Mara Harris loads a box of produce into her car, along with canned food and boxed goods. It marks the second week in a row she will drive the groceries to families across Los Angeles who say immigration raids are keeping them inside their homes.

    “I got involved because I live in Highland Park, which is a primarily Latinx neighborhood, and I was feeling really frustrated and angry about our neighbors being unfairly treated,” Harris said.

    Harris is a member of Nefesh, a Jewish outreach community that has partnered with local faith leaders to deliver goods. Her role is straightforward: pick up the groceries, drive them to families who have requested help, and drop them off.

    “My husband is an immigrant,” she said. “I just think about the anxiety that we have going through the process, even with the resources we have access to, and I think about how impossible it is for other people to navigate that.”

    She added, “It’s just chance that some people were born in countries that are safe and that provide them with opportunities, and other people are not. And I think the U.S. has an obligation to extend that opportunity to those people.”

    The grocery deliveries are being organized by a Koreatown church that has seen a decline in attendance at its regular food distribution program in recent months. At the request of church leadership, The LA Local is not naming the church or its congregants out of privacy concerns and to avoid drawing attention to their immigrant community. It’s just one of a network of faith-based organizations responding to the need, and as raids show no signs of slowing down anytime soon, the group is seeking to expand its delivery hubs to more church sites.

    Before the recent enforcement activity, the Koreatown church’s regular food distribution served between 500 and 600 people, according to one church organizer. In early February, they saw around 350.

    “People are afraid, and unfortunately don’t know about services like this,” she said.

    Multiple families have said they’re just too afraid to go out into the neighborhood, according to church leadership.

    Since last summer, federal agents have carried out workplace raids, targeted day labor sites and arrested people in public spaces across the region. The Department of Homeland Security reported in December that more than 10,000 people had been detained in the LA area since June.

    “There are members of our congregation that have immigration concerns that have told me they’re afraid to go out,” the pastor of the Koreatown church said. “I’ve spoken to at least four different families that are just afraid to go get groceries, are afraid to take their kids or their grandkids to school, and are worried about ICE activity in the neighborhood that’s been happening over the past seven months or so.”

    Need help?

    Call Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice at (213) 481-3740 for information about grocery delivery.

    In response, the church began coordinating home grocery deliveries in partnership with Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice, or CLUE. The partnership started last summer after church staff noticed a drop in attendance at their weekly food distributions.

    “A lot of people were afraid to go to the food bank at (the church), so they saw a big decline and understood that it was because people were afraid to come out, so CLUE partnered with them to do this delivery service,” said Liz Bar-El, a community liaison for CLUE.

    Another staff member who has worked at the Koreatown church for six years said operations have been directly affected by enforcement activity in the area.

    “I’ve been doing this for about six years. Last week, we had to stop at 11 a.m., and we used to close at 12, 12:30 because the ICE agents were around here,” he said. “And the number of people is decreasing because of ICE raids.”

    The church pastor said families do not simply call and request food; there is a screening system to ensure that the program reaches those who are most concerned about leaving their homes.

    CLUE has “folks that help call through the list of people that requested it to confirm for the day of their deliveries. They also have somebody that does a screening process to make sure that the people that are getting the deliveries qualify for the parameters of the program so that they’re not just getting people who are like ‘Yeah, you can deliver food to me’ but rather are really concerned about their status,” he said.

    But Bar-El, the organizer with CLUE, said identifying families can be difficult.

    “It’s likely due to fear of trusting somebody, they are hiding in their homes,” she said. “One way to reach them is through their pastors and the rapid response network that CLUE is a part of.”

    Many of the requests stem from sudden changes in a family’s circumstances.

    “This current situation with grocery delivery is mostly people who need help getting food because somebody got detained, deported and or the main breadwinner lost their job,” Bar-El said. “In one case, the husband was recently bonded out, and the wife was left home with three very small children.”

    For Harris, the volunteer delivering food across multiple neighborhoods, the work is personal. She often thinks about her own family’s immigration status.

    “My husband is British and he’s been working here off work visas for six years. He just applied for a non-conditional green card last year. So I take our anxiety and worries and extrapolate it,” she said.

    Organizers don’t expect the need for this service to ease anytime soon. Bar-El said they plan to expand the effort to another church in Hollywood and are seeking more volunteers.

    “I believe it’s my responsibility as someone who is one of the lucky ones and who does have resources and privilege to do what I can for my neighbors and for my city that I love that is so diverse and wonderful,” Harris said.