Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • UNESCO list reaches 1,248 natural, cultural sites

    Topline:

    UNESCO has added 26 new locations to its World Heritage List, bringing the total to 1,248 sites recognized globally for their cultural or natural importance. From a sacred mountain in Malawi to a Brazilian canyon rich in biodiversity, these newly designated landmarks span continents and centuries of history.

    New additions: This year’s sites include 17th century forts in Jamaica, ancient petroglyphs in South Korea, royal palaces in Germany, and a river canyon in Brazil, joining a list that has grown nearly every year since 1978.

    Preservation and global support: Selected by a 21-country committee, the sites are now eligible for conservation funding and international support, with each host country required to commit to their long-term protection.

    Read on ... for details of some of the additions.

    Twenty-six sites have been added to UNESCO's World Heritage List, designating their cultural and natural importance.

    Locations this year include a sacred mountain in Malawi; petroglyphs in South Korea; remains of a port and forts from 17th century Port Royal, Jamaica; a king's palaces in Germany; and a river canyon in Brazil noted for its biodiversity.

    The World Heritage List, now numbering 1,248 locations, includes "cultural and natural properties of outstanding universal value." Sites have been added almost every year since 1978. UNESCO is a United Nations agency focused on culture, science and education.

    Representatives of 21 countries on the World Heritage Committee met this month in Paris to finalize which locations to add to the list. Countries with World Heritage sites must commit to preserving them; countries with designated sites could also receive funding to help with that conservation.
    Here's a selection of some of the locations added this year:

    Bavarian palaces

    Neuschwanstein Castle sits among green forests and alpine mountains in Germany.
    Neuschwanstein Castle is part of the four palace complexes included in the World Heritage Site list.
    (
    J. Beck
    /
    UNESCO Nomination File
    )

    King Ludwig II of Bavaria had these grand palaces built between 1864 and 1886 in what is now Germany, according to UNESCO. He ascended to the throne at age 18 and has been called the "Mad King," because of his long rants, hallucinations and paranoia. The four palace complexes listed are called Neuschwanstein, Linderhof, Schachen and Herrenchiemsee. The palaces are now a tourist attraction, "records in stone of the ideal fantasy world which the king built as a refuge from reality," according to a biography on a website for the palaces.

    World Heritage Sites in California

    Imperial tombs in China

    Tomb mounds plotted around a dry, mountainous desert landscape in China.
    An aerial view of Mausoleum No. 4, part of the imperial tombs of the Xixia Dynasty.
    (
    Administrative Office of Xixia Tomb Area of Yinchuan City
    /
    UNESCO Nomination File
    )

    The necropolis is located in north-central China's Ningxia region. People from the Xixia Dynasty are buried among the "nine imperial mausoleums, 271 subordinate tombs, a northern architectural complex, and 32 flood control structures," as UNESCO describes. The dynasty lasted from 1038 to 1227, when it was destroyed by Genghis Khan's Mongol army.

    China's government said the site shows "the crucial role of Xixia as a key distribution center on the Silk Roads during the 11th and 13th centuries." It added that the location is "the largest, highest-ranked, and most intact archaeological site from the Xixia period that has survived to the present day."

    Remains of 17th century Port Royal, Jamaica

    Cannons and brick pathways sit in the courtyard of Fort Charles in Jamaica.
    Fort Charles museum in Port Royal, pictured in 2012. The fort was built in the 1600s.
    (
    Mladen Antonov
    /
    AFP via Getty Images
    )

    Port Royal, in southeastern Jamaica, was a major English port city in the 17th century. According to UNESCO, it was a center of transatlantic trade, which included enslaved Africans. It was also a hub for pirates. A 1692 earthquake pushed much of the town underwater.

    Ecosystems of the Bijagós Islands

    A tree stands near a pond where ducks gather along the shore.
    Wildlife in Orango National Park on the Bijagós Archipelago.
    (
    Enrique López-Tapia de Inés/IBAP
    /
    UNESCO Nomination File
    )

    The Bijagós Archipelago, off the coast of Guinea-Bissau, is known for its biodiversity. It's home to "endangered Green and Leatherback turtles, manatees, dolphins, and over 870,000 migratory shorebirds," UNESCO says.

    Memorials to the Cambodian genocide

    Two men look at rows of human skulls displayed behind glass at a memorial.
    People look at skulls at the Choeung Ek memorial in Phnom Penh, Cambodia in 2018. The location is part of a newly designated World Heritage Site.
    (
    Tang Chhin Sothy
    /
    AFP via Getty Images
    )

    The communist Khmer Rouge regime was responsible for the deaths of some 1.7 million Cambodians in the 1970s. Two former prisons and an execution site are included in the World Heritage List designation. An international tribunal ended its work in 2022, holding just three senior Khmer Rouge members accountable for the regime's crimes.

    The full list of new sites for 2025

    The committee also approved extending two existing national parks that were already listed. Vietnam's Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park was extended to include the adjoining Hin Nam No National Park in Laos. And South Africa's iSimangaliso Wetland Park, listed in 1999, was extended to include Maputo National Park in Mozambique.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Phone lines down due to copper theft
    The entrance to the East LA Sheriff's Station. To the right is a sign that says East Los Angeles Station at the top, has a large sheriff's badge in the middle, with gold on the edges, a blue circle, with orange inside the circle and a bear on the orange background. Underneath the badge, it says "Sheriff." To the left of the sign are glass windows and double glass doors.
    The entrance to the East L.A. Sheriff's station.

    Topline:

    Copper wire theft damaged business phone lines at the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department’s East L.A. Station in February — two months later, service is still down.

    Why it matters: Residents have faced longer wait times to get in touch with the department for non-emergencies. Now, all dispatchers are working from an off-site communication trailer connected via satellite, according to officials.

    The backstory: Copper wire theft has plagued the Eastside in recent years, leaving communities in the dark and disabling public facilities. Repairing damaged fiber lines can be difficult and time consuming for service providers.

    Read on... for more on the downed phone lines.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Copper wire theft damaged business phone lines at the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department’s East L.A. Station in February — two months later, service is still down.

    Residents have faced longer wait times to get in touch with the department for non-emergencies. Now, all dispatchers are working from an off-site communication trailer connected via satellite, according to officials.

    “We elevated this to the highest level we possibly could,” said Operations Captain Shawnee N. Hinchman at a Maravilla Community Advisory Committee (MCAC) meeting last week. “Our dispatchers aren’t even at the station right now because we had to reroute the lines to a different location, so we’re even down personnel.”

    At the meeting, East L.A. resident Guadalupe Arellano said she’s struggled to contact the station to report parking enforcement issues.

    “The last few times that I tried to make calls to…the Sheriff’s office, they had answering machines or are no longer answering calls,” she said.  

    An officer told her that the best line of action is to contact the Sheriff’s Department directly, but noted delays are expected.

    According to Sgt. Michael Mileski, several thousand dollars’ worth of copper wiring was stolen from an electrical vault during the early morning hours on Feb. 13. Fiber optic cables were damaged in the process, which affected a significant portion of the Eastern Avenue corridor in Boyle Heights and East L.A., disrupting phone lines for 100,000 residents for 5 days, Mileski said. 

    Mileski was unsure why service had not been restored at the station and did not provide a timeline for repairs.

    “We were told back in February that this would be ongoing. They said it would take about a month and a half to fix the problem,” Mileski said.

    Copper wire theft has plagued the Eastside in recent years, leaving communities in the dark and disabling public facilities. Repairing damaged fiber lines can be difficult and time consuming for service providers. 

    The office of Assemblymember Jessica Caloza has also stepped in to try to expedite the resolution. Hector Rodriguez, a field representative for Caloza’s office, told residents at the meeting that they are working with AT&T to restore service, but it has taken longer than expected.

    “It’s extremely frustrating even for us as well but our office takes this extremely seriously, just like the community,” Rodriguez said. A spokesperson for AT&T wasn’t immediately available to answer questions from Boyle Heights Beat.  

    As of Thursday, the business phone lines remain down and calls cannot be transferred within the East L.A. Sheriff’s Station.

    Lt. William Morris told Boyle Heights Beat that four to seven dispatchers are currently working at a time from an off-site communications trailer. If a caller is unable to get through, Morris recommends trying again and said a dispatcher will eventually pick up. He added that 911 calls will go through no matter what.

    LA Documenter Alex Medina contributed reporting for this story. LA Documenters trains and pays LA residents to take notes at local government meetings around Los Angeles. You can find meeting notes and audio at losangeles.documenters.org

  • Sponsored message
  • Hopefuls to meet up in Koreatown tomorrow
    From left, Betty Yee, Antonio Villaraigosa, Tony Thurmond, Tom Steyer, Katie Porter, Matt Mahan and Xavier Becerra attend a gubernatorial candidate forum on Latino and immigrant communities in Sacramento, Calif., Tuesday, April 14, 2026. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)
    Several candidates (some pictured here at an earlier debate in Sacramento) running for California governor will take part in a public forum Saturday in Koreatown, offering residents a chance to hear directly from them ahead of the primary election on June 2.

    Topline:

    Several candidates running for California governor will take part in a public forum tomorrow in Koreatown, offering residents a chance to hear directly from them ahead of the primary election on June 2. 

    Who is expected: Confirmed candidates include Democrats Xavier Becerra, Tom Steyer, Tony Thurmond, Antonio Villaraigosa and Betty Yee. Candidates were invited based on fundraising totals reported earlier this year to the California Secretary of State.

    Who was invited but hasn't RSVPed: Democrats Matt Mahan and Katie Porter, along with Republicans Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton, were also invited but have not confirmed their attendance.

    Keep reading... for details on how to attend or listen.

    Several candidates running for California governor will take part in a public forum Saturday in Koreatown, offering residents a chance to hear directly from them ahead of the primary election on June 2. 

    Confirmed candidates include Democrats Xavier Becerra, Tom Steyer, Tony Thurmond, Antonio Villaraigosa and Betty Yee. Candidates were invited based on fundraising totals reported earlier this year to the California Secretary of State.

    Democrats Matt Mahan and Katie Porter, along with Republicans Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton, were also invited but have not confirmed their attendance, according to the Center for Asian Americans United for Self Empowerment (CAUSE), one of the lead host organizations.

    Details on attending and viewing

    The forum will run from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. at World Mission University located at 500 Shatto Place. Doors open at 9 a.m. and space is limited. RSVP is required, though entry is not guaranteed.

    The forum will not be livestreamed but organizers say recordings will be released by May 4 with translations in Bengali, Chinese, Hindi, Korean, Punjabi, Tagalog, Thai and Vietnamese with the possibility of additional languages.

    Parking will be limited. About 80 spaces are available in the building’s first-floor garage, with another 15 to 20 spaces potentially available in a second-floor tenant lot. Free parking is also available in a nearby lot on Westmoreland Avenue, according to the university.

    Focus on AAPI communities

    Organizers say the forum is designed to connect candidates directly with AANHPI communities. More than 7.3 million Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders live in California, making up over 15% of the population.

    “California’s AANHPI communities are a driving force behind the state’s economy, culture, and democracy,” Korean American Democratic Committee (KADC) President Esther Lim said in a statement.

    “As the only gubernatorial forum in Los Angeles County hosted by and for AANHPI communities, this is a historic opportunity for candidates to connect with one of California’s fastest growing and most influential communities. Our coalition represents organizations across the political spectrum united by a common goal: ensuring AANHPI Californians are seen, heard, and prioritized.”

    Organizers said Koreatown was an intentional choice for the forum. 

    “Koreatown, like many AANHPI communities, has historically been overlooked and underestimated, making it especially meaningful to bring gubernatorial candidates directly into this space,” KADC and CAUSE said in a joint statement. “It was important to hold this forum in a location that is both accessible by public transportation and grounded in the communities we serve.” 

    Where polls stand

    The forum comes as the race shifts following Democrat Eric Swalwell’s exit. The candidate — who had been invited — suspended his campaign last week after facing allegations of rape and sexual assault, which he has denied.

    A new Emerson College Polling survey conducted April 14-15 shows a wide-open race, with Hilton leading at 17% and nearly a quarter of voters still undecided. Bianco and Steyer trail closely behind at 14%.

    Among Democrats, the poll found support is now split between Steyer (20%), Becerra (19%) and Porter (15%), with Becerra gaining ground after Swalwell left the race, according to the poll.

    The post Koreatown to host candidate forum for California’s next governor appeared first on LA Local.

  • Dems can't decide, leadership not weighing in
    Seven people stand behind individual podiums on a stage in front of an audience sitting on chairs. The podiums have a design of a woman imposed over the state of California and text in Spanish that translated reads "Our voice '26."
    From left, Betty Yee, Antonio Villaraigosa, Tony Thurmond, Tom Steyer, Katie Porter, Matt Mahan and Xavier Becerra participate in a gubernatorial candidate forum hosted by California Immigrant Policy Center, California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation, and ACLU California Action at the SAFE Credit Union Convention Center in Sacramento on April 14, 2026.

    Topline:

    Even after Rep. Eric Swalwell’s swift and sudden exit, the race for governor is still frustratingly murky on the Democratic side, with seven major candidates splitting the vote. As party faithful hope for divine intervention, heavyweights like the speaker emerita and the current governor refuse to weigh in.

    More details: Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the face of the party in California, is not interested in elevating a successor. Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks, who faces criticism for not using his position to cull the field, has relied on party-commissioned polls and vague pleas for candidates to “honestly assess” their campaign’s viability, refusing to openly pressure anyone to drop out. Even former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — known for urging then-Rep. Adam Schiff to run for Senate and former President Joe Biden to drop his reelection bid — won’t intervene.

    Read on... for how California Democrats are navigating it.

    Democrats are searching for a hero to save them in the California governor’s race.

    So far, no one in party leadership has come to the rescue.

    Despite Rep. Eric Swalwell’s exit from the race this week, the Democratic field remains unwieldy, with seven major candidates still splitting the field less than three weeks before ballots are sent. Each of them refuses to bow out, regardless of their polling numbers, in the hope they can capture some of the voter attention that Swalwell’s demise drew to the race.

    Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the face of the party in California, is not interested in elevating a successor. Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks, who faces criticism for not using his position to cull the field, has relied on party-commissioned polls and vague pleas for candidates to “honestly assess” their campaign’s viability, refusing to openly pressure anyone to drop out.

    Even former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — known for urging then-Rep. Adam Schiff to run for Senate and former President Joe Biden to drop his reelection bid — won’t intervene.

    “People have reached out to me saying, ‘Your mom has to do something!’” said Christine Pelosi, daughter of the San Francisco congresswoman and herself a candidate for state Senate.

    “I said, ‘You know what? She doesn't, though,’” the younger Pelosi said. “She already did that with Biden and Harris. She's not going to — don't look to her to do that again.”

    Gone is the heyday of the San Francisco-based political machine, a network of political talent that dominated state politics for decades and produced titans such as Pelosi and Newsom, both of whom are moving on from California politics.

    Now that pipeline has run dry, and this year there is no obvious heir to Newsom for the party to coalesce behind. No current statewide officeholder joined the fray, and both presumptive favorites — former Vice President Kamala Harris and U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla — opted not to run.

    That has made top Democrats loath to weigh in on the state’s first truly open Democratic primary in 16 years. In 2018, Newsom, then the lieutenant governor, was widely viewed as the most likely successor to former Gov. Jerry Brown, another product of the San Francisco political machine.

    The 2026 race is also only the second time an open field has competed under the top-two primary system, adopted 16 years ago to the chagrin of both parties. That means two Democrats or two Republicans could advance to the general election and lock the other party out.

    Newsom reiterated his lack of interest this week when he issued a statement that said in part, “I have full confidence that voters will choose a candidate who reflects the values and direction Californians believe in.”

    Too much democracy for Democrats?

    While grassroots activists have for decades decried the king-making of insider machine politics, the alternative — an abundance of candidates with no clear frontrunner — has proved unappealing too.

    The resulting decision paralysis has resurrected calls for a strong leader to step in.

    “This has been incredibly frustrating, not to mention scary, with the idea that we could end up with two Republicans,” said RL Miller, a longtime delegate and chair of the party’s environmental caucus. “I really do believe that there has been a failure of leadership at the top.”

    Miller theorized that party leaders were overcorrecting after years of backlash following the 2016 presidential election, in which establishment Democrats disregarded the grassroots support for Sen. Bernie Sanders and instead anointed Hillary Clinton.

    As more Democratic gubernatorial candidates entered the fray in the last year, Miller said she thought leadership had the “admirable intent” of letting delegates winnow the field themselves.

    But anxieties were already spiking before the Democrats’ endorsing convention in February, where none of the nine candidates vying for the gubernatorial nod amassed more than 25% — far short of the 60% needed. Hicks faced repeated questions then about whether he would step in, but insisted it wasn’t his role.

    “By the party convention, the alarm bells had been ringing for months,” said Miller, who has consistently voted against Hicks in internal party elections.

    California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks, a man with light skin tone, wearing a charcoal gray suit and checkered shirt, speaks behind a podium with signage that reads "CADEM" while standing next to the California flag.
    California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks addresses the media in Sacramento on Nov. 17, 2023.
    (
    Miguel Gutierrez Jr.
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    After the convention, Hicks released an open letter urging that “every candidate honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign,” and “if you do not have a viable path to make it to the general election” not to file to run. Only one listened, former Assemblymember Ian Calderon, who was polling around 1% or less.

    Later, Hicks announced the party would conduct ongoing polls on the race and release them every seven to 10 days through early May, when ballots are sent.

    Hicks’ defenders said he was right to abstain from picking favorites. Christine Pelosi said it would be “inappropriate” for the chair to weigh in on the candidates after delegates at the party convention chose not to endorse anyone.

    Hicks’ calls for candidates to “consider their viability” was a “somewhat extraordinary and surprising” move, said Paul Mitchell, the architect of the gerrymandered congressional maps that voters approved via Proposition 50 to boost congressional Democrats in the upcoming election.

    “It maybe wasn't surprising for people who think that the Democratic Party chair is like a backroom dealer that's going to knock heads or something like that,” Mitchell said. “But that's not the chair’s role in California right now.”

    Top-two primary adds to tension

    Both Mitchell and Christine Pelosi blamed the top-two system for much of the drama. The slim possibility that two Republicans could emerge from the primary has spurred many of the calls for leadership to weigh in.

    Mitchell argued that since President Donald Trump put a thumb on the scale by endorsing former Fox News host Steve Hilton, there’s less risk that both he and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco would end up on the November ticket, alleviating some of the pressure on Democrats.

    “If it wasn't a top two, people wouldn't care,” said Christine Pelosi. “You wouldn't have the added agita of ‘there's only two Republicans and there's a bunch of Democrats.’”

    Notably, the state GOP failed to endorse a candidate at its recent convention, indicating that Trump’s nod might not hold as much sway as Democrats assume.

    Still, if Hicks is trying to convince rank-and-file Democrats he’s doing enough, it’s not working.

    Amar Shergill, the former leader of the party’s progressive caucus, suggested that its weak, decentralized leadership was by design so monied interests could exert more control over who gets elected.

    “Rusty Hicks is furniture that folks with real power use at their discretion,” Shergill said.

    “There's no sort of anger or animosity towards him as a person,” he said. “If it wasn’t Rusty, it would be somebody else. This is just the political situation right now.”

    In an interview, Hicks told CalMatters that he is “doing what is required” to ensure a Democrat wins the race. But when pressed repeatedly, Hicks would not elaborate on what that work entails, if he believes what he’s done so far is working or if he should have had a stronger hand in culling the field, as his critics have suggested.

    “I'm not interested in opening up the playbook as to what we will or will not do in the coming days and weeks,” he said.

    CalMatters’ Yue Stella Yu contributed to this report.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • They're coming to 20 locations this fall
    A motorcycle officers is parked in a busy intersection
    More than 20 locations in South LA will get speed cameras under a pilot program that gets rolling this fall.

    Topline:

    More than 20 locations in South L.A. will get speed cameras under a pilot program that gets rolling this fall. 

    Why now: The plan was approved by the L.A. City Council last month and will cover a total 125 targeted zones in the city, according to L.A. Department of Transportation documents. LADOT says the cameras are aimed at reducing traffic fatalities while complying with a 2023 state law that requires LA and five other cities to establish automated speed enforcement programs before 2032.

    What's next: The cameras could start snapping photos of speedsters as early as July, with a 60-day warning period  — where drivers wouldn’t be fined — running into September. 

    More than 20 locations in South L.A. will get speed cameras under a pilot program that gets rolling this fall. 

    The plan, which was approved by the L.A. City Council last month, will cover a total 125 targeted zones in the city, according to L.A. Department of Transportation documents. The cameras could start snapping photos of speedsters as early as July, with a 60-day warning period  — where drivers wouldn’t be fined — running into September. 

    LADOT says the cameras are aimed at reducing traffic fatalities while complying with a 2023 state law that requires LA and five other cities to establish automated speed enforcement programs before 2032.

    L.A. saw 290 traffic fatalities in 2025, according to LA Police Department data, 6% less than 2024. Several of the city’s deadliest intersections are clustered in South L.A. along Western Avenue, Vermont Avenue and Figueroa Street, according to data analyzed by Crosstown.

    Where will the speed cameras be installed in South LA?

    Some intersections will have multiple camera clusters installed on the streets around them. The intersection of Gage Avenue and Figueroa Street, for example, will have cameras to the north, south and west. 

    Cameras will be located on:

    • Figueroa Street between Adams Boulevard and 23rd Street
    • Figueroa Street between Gage Avenue and 62nd Street 
    • Figueroa Street between 68th Street and Gage Avenue
    • Figueroa Street between Manchester Avenue and 85th Street 
    • Normandie Avenue between 62nd Street and 64th Street
    • Western Avenue between 55th Street and 53rd Street 
    • Western Avenue between 24th Street and Adams Boulevard 
    • Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard between Hobart Boulevard and Saint Andrews Place 
    • Florence Avenue between Van Ness Avenue and Haas Avenue 
    • Florence Avenue between Vermont Avenue and Hoover Street 
    • Vermont Avenue between Florence Avenue and 71st Street 
    • Vermont Avenue between 58th Place and 57th Street 
    • Vernon Avenue between Wadsworth Avenue and McKinley Avenue 
    • Gage Avenue between Hoover Street and Figueroa Street 
    • Gage Avenue between Halldale Avenue and Raymond Avenue
    • Slauson Avenue between Brentwood Street and Inskeep Avenue 
    • Slauson Avenue between Budlong Avenue and Menlo Avenue 
    • Central Avenue between 92nd Avenue and 91st Street 
    • Avalon Boulevard between 77th Street and 74th Street 
    • Manchester Avenue between Wadsworth Avenue and Central Avenue
    • La Brea Avenue between Veronica Street and Coliseum Street 
    • La Cienega Boulevard between Coliseum Street and Bowesfield Street 
    • Arlington Avenue between Adams Boulevard and 18th Street 
    • Jefferson Boulevard between Crenshaw Boulevard and Bronson Avenue
    More than 20 locations in South LA will get speed cameras under a pilot program that gets rolling this fall.

    How much will tickets cost? 

    Cameras will snap a photo of a speeding vehicle’s rear that includes its license plate as well as its make and model. 

    The system will document the date, time and vehicle speed, then issue a citation to the vehicle’s registered owner, according to LADOT’s policy plan.  

    Fines will ratchet higher based on how fast a vehicle is moving, starting with a $50 fine for vehicles going 11 to 15 mph above the limit. 

    Vehicles moving 16 to 25 mph over the limit will get $100 fines, and vehicles going 26 mph or more over the limit will get $200 fines. 

    The max fine will be $500 for vehicles that go 100 mph or more above the speed limit.

    LADOT said camera images will not include rear windshields or faces, and that state law does not allow the cameras to use facial recognition technology.

    How were speed camera locations selected?

    Some Angelenos submitted comments to LADOT, worrying the speed camera program will disproportionately affect people of color, according to a March 20 department memo. 

    LADOT said in the memo that it worked to minimize any inequity, in part, by distributing the cameras evenly across the city’s 15 council districts, with every district getting at least eight cameras, and no district getting more than nine.  

    The transportation department said it based much of its location selection on speed-related collision data and proximity to places like senior centers and schools. 

    State law requires that the city continue monitoring the program’s effectiveness and impact on civil rights and liberties, according to LADOT.

    The post Speed cameras are coming to South LA — here’s where they’ll be installed appeared first on LA Local.