Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Last Eaton Fire dog at Pasadena Humane is adopted
    A white dog smiling at the camera.
    Artemis the German Shepherd is the last dog from Eaton Fire at Pasadena Humane to get adopted.

    Topline:

    The last dog from the Eaton Fire taken in by Pasadena Humane has now been adopted.

    Why it matters: The Eaton Fire destroyed nearly 9,500 structures, including about 6,000 homes. Two days after the first broke out, Pasadena Humane reported receiving more than 350 pets from displaced residents.

    The backstory: Artemis the German shepherd was originally taken to the Pasadena animal shelter for emergency boarding. His family, which lost its home in the January fire, ultimately decided to put him up for adoption.

    The last dog from the Eaton Fire taken in by Pasadena Humane has now been adopted.

    Artemis the German shepherd was originally taken to the Pasadena animal shelter for emergency boarding. His family, which lost its home in the January fire, ultimately decided to put him up for adoption.

    “Today, we’re celebrating something truly meaningful: Every animal who came into our care during the Eaton Fire is now home,” shelter officials said in a statement.

    The Eaton Fire destroyed nearly 9,500 structures, including about 6,000 homes. Two days after the first broke out, Pasadena Humane reported receiving more than 350 pets from displaced residents.

  • Supreme Court leaning toward ending TPS for some

    Topline:

    The Supreme Court's conservative majority seemed ready Wednesday to allow the Trump administration to potentially proceed with mass deportations of more than a million foreign nationals, including those from Haiti and Syria, who live and work legally in the United States.

    How we got here: Until now these individuals have been accorded temporary legal status because their safety is imperiled by war or natural disasters in their home countries. Congress enacted the Temporary Protected Status program in 1990, and every president since then — Republican and Democrat — has embraced TPS. President Trump, however, is trying to end it. On Wednesday his solicitor general, D. John Sauer, told the justices that the statute clearly bars any court review of the administration's decisions. And he dismissed the idea that a separate law established to provide procedural fairness does not allow the courts to review the Homeland Security agency's decision-making either.

    Read on . . . for more on today's court proceedings.

    The Supreme Court's conservative majority seemed ready Wednesday to allow the Trump administration to potentially proceed with mass deportations of more than a million foreign nationals, including those from Haiti and Syria, who live and work legally in the United States.

    Until now these individuals have been accorded temporary legal status because their safety is imperiled by war or natural disasters in their home countries.

    Congress enacted the Temporary Protected Status program in 1990, and every president since then — Republican and Democrat — has embraced TPS. President Donald Trump, however, is trying to end it.

    On Wednesday his solicitor general, D. John Sauer, told the justices that the statute clearly bars any court review of the administration's decisions. And he dismissed the idea that a separate law established to provide procedural fairness does not allow the courts to review the Homeland Security agency's decision-making either. Pressed by the court's three liberal justices, Sauer insisted that the courts cannot review anything.

    "None of those procedural steps required by the statue are reviewable. That's your position?" asked Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

    "Correct," responded Sauer.

    "What you're basically saying is that Congress wrote a statute for no purpose," Sotomayor said.

    Justice Elena Kagan noted that under the statute the secretary of Homeland Security is supposed to consult with the U.S. State Department about what the conditions are in those countries that people have been forced to flee. What if she didn't do that at all, Kagan asked. Or what if she asked, but the response from the State Department came back: "Wasn't that baseball game last night great!"

    Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked what would happen if the secretary used a Ouija board to make decisions?

    To all these hypotheticals, Solicitor General Sauer stood firm. That prompted this from Sotomayor: "Now, we have a president saying at one point that Haiti is a 'filthy, dirty, and disgusting s--thole country.' I'm quoting him. He declared illegal immigrants, which he associated with TPS, as poisoning the blood of America. I don't see how that one statement is not a prime example … showing that a discriminatory purpose may have played a part in this decision."

    Sauer pushed back, noting that Kristi Noem, the then-DHS secretary, had not mentioned race at all. That prompted this response from Justice Jackson, the only Black woman on the court, "So the position of the United States is that we have an actual racial epithet that we aren't allowed to look at all the context."

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the mother of two adopted Haitian children, interjected at that point to clarify the administration's position. Are you conceding that individuals with TPS status could bring a challenge based on race discrimination? she asked.

    Sauer appeared to concede the point.

    Representing the Haitians, lawyer Geoffrey Pipoly described the administration's review as "a sham."

    "The true reason for the termination [of TPS status] is the president's racial animus toward non-white immigrants and bare dislike of Haitians in particular," Pipoly said. "The secretary herself described people from Haiti" and from other non-white countries as "killers, leeches, saying, 'We don't want them, not one,'" while "simultaneously enacting another humanitarian form of relief for white and only white South Africans."

    That was too much for Justice Samuel Alito who asked Pipoly, "Do you think that if you put Syrians, Turks, Greeks and other people who live around the Mediterranean in a line-up, do you think you could say those people are … non-white?"

    An uncomfortable Pipoly resisted categorizing each group until Alito got to his own roots.

    "How about southern Italians?" Alito inquired, prompting laughter in the courtroom.

    Responded Pipoly: "Certainly 120 years ago when we had our last wave of European immigration, southern Italians were not considered white. … Our concept of these things evolves over time."

    At the end of Wednesday's court session, one thing was clear: President Trump may be furious at some of the conservative justices he appointed for invalidating his tariffs, but for the most part, he is getting his way. Especially in light of the court's 6-to-3 decision, announced Wednesday, which effectively guts what remains of the landmark Voting Rights Act, once celebrated as a signature achievement of American Democracy.

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Organizers call for economic blackout
    A crowd of people carrying colorful signs in downtown Los Angeles.
    People gathered in downtown L.A. for May Day in 2025.

    Topline:

    Southern California and national organizers are calling on communities to abstain from work, school and shopping Friday in recognition of May Day.

    The backstory: May Day started after an 1886 strike tied to the fight for an eight-hour work day. The protest turned violent after police attacked workers. In the 1990s, L.A. organizers started to connect the labor movement with advocacy for immigrant rights.

    What's new: This year’s “economic blackout” is modeled after January protests in Minnesota following the surge of immigration enforcement and shooting deaths of two U.S. citizens. “ Our vision includes an economy that works for everyone with a living wage, strong labor protections and programs that keep families housed, fed, educated and healthy,” said Francisco Moreno, executive director of the Council of Mexican Federations in North America, in a Tuesday press conference.

    Find a rally: What’s typically the region’s largest May Day gathering starts Friday morning at MacArthur Park, and events are planned throughout the region.

    National and local organizers are calling on communities to abstain from work, school and shopping Friday in recognition of May Day.

    The “economic blackout” is modeled after January protests in Minnesota following the surge of immigration enforcement and shooting deaths of two U.S. citizens.

    “Our vision includes an economy that works for everyone with a living wage, strong labor protections and programs that keep families housed, fed, educated and healthy,” said Francisco Moreno, executive director of the Council of Mexican Federations in North America, in a Tuesday press conference.

    The organization is one of more than 100 involved in planning a Los Angeles May Day rally with the theme, “solo el pueblo shuts it down:  no school, no work, no shopping.”

    This year’s largest planned gathering starts at MacArthur Park, a longtime hub for day laborers and street vendors. Last July, immigration agents in armored vehicles descended on the park. The ongoing immigration raids and city policies have contributed to the challenges street vendors face.

    “Starting there really sends a message that we're here,” said Kristal Romero, press secretary for the  Los Angeles County Federation of Labor. “We're standing with this community, and if you take on one of us, you take on all of us.”

    May Day’s history in LA

    May Day, sometimes called International Workers' Day, started after an 1886 strike tied to the fight for an eight-hour work day. The protest turned violent after police attacked workers. In the 1990s, L.A. organizers started to connect the labor movement with advocacy for immigrant rights.

    This year’s event also marks the 20th anniversary of 2006’s massive rallies in support of immigration reform.

    Romero said the Federation has offered training on de-escalation, conflict resolution and non-violent protests and that hundreds of people will act as “peacekeepers” during Friday’s rally and march.

    “ A lot of times, folks can get caught in echo chambers and it may really feel hopeless,” Romero said. “The big point of these events is to inspire hope to show people we're all here, we're all fighting for the same thing.”

    Los Angeles County

    MacArthur Park

    Time: 10 a.m.
    Location: March begins at the corner of South Park View Street and Wilshire Boulevard and heads toward downtown L.A.
    Organizers: Los Angeles May Day Coalition

    L.A. City Hall

    Time: Noon
    Location: City Hall, 200 N. Spring St., downtown L.A.
    Organizers: Union del Barrio and the Community Self-Defense Coalition

    Boyle Heights

    Time: 3 p.m.
    Location: Mariachi Plaza, 1831 First St.
    Organizers: Centro CSO

    Long Beach

    Time: 10 a.m.
    Location: March starts at The Marketplace, 6501 Pacific Coast Highway, and ends at Mother’s Beach.
    Organizers: Long Beach Indivisible, more details here.

    San Fernando Valley

    Time: 10 a.m.
    Location: Northeast corner of Topanga Canyon and Victory Boulevard, Woodland Hills
    Organizers: Indivisible Woodland Hills, SF Valley Brigade, others

    Santa Clarita

    Time: 10 a.m.
    Location: 24292 Valencia Blvd.
    Organizers: Indivisible CA27

    Additional May Day events

    • The website May Day Strong also lists more than a dozen additional events from the South Bay to the Inland Empire. 
    • Know another event we should include? Email the reporter for consideration. Please include the date, time, location and organizers.

    Orange County 

    Orange

    Time: 3 p.m. rally
    Location: City Hall, 300 E. Chapman Ave.

    Time: 5 p.m.
    Location: Orange Plaza Circle, Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street
    Organizers: OC Indivisible Coalition

    Santa Ana

    Time: 3:30 p.m.
    Location: Sasscer Park, 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Santa Ana
    Organizers: OC May Day Coalition

  • Department significantly increases use of drones
    Three men sit at desk with large computer monitors. Another man sits facing them at a long table with long black microphones.
    The LAPD has sharply accelerated its use of drones in policing, including deploying them to protests in the city to survey crowds.

    Topline:

    The LAPD has sharply accelerated its use of drones in policing, including deploying them to protests in the city to survey crowds. The department conducted 3,030 drone flights to support various calls for police service and 480 for high-risk operations from June through December 2025, according to a presentation provided to the L.A. Board of Police Commissioners Tuesday.

    Use of drones during protests: Detective Michael Hackman, manager of the department’s Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems program, told the commissioners that the department has already surpassed 2025's number of flights in the first four months of 2026, indicating LAPD has accelerated the program’s use significantly.

    Why it matters: Activists and media have questioned the department’s use of drones during recent protests against federal immigration enforcement. Some have called on the department to restrict its use of various surveillance technologies, including drones, saying they can be used to identify people vulnerable to the federal government’s immigration enforcement activities. Hackman said that the drones flying over peaceful protests aimed to provide the LAPD with “crowd awareness, crowd behavior assessments and crowd size assessments.”

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    The LAPD has sharply accelerated its use of drones in policing, including deploying them to protests in the city to survey crowds.

    The department conducted 3,030 drone flights to support various calls for police service and 480 for high-risk operations from June through December 2025, according to a presentation provided to the L.A. Board of Police Commissioners Tuesday.

    Detective Michael Hackman, manager of the department’s Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems program, told the commissioners that the department has already surpassed that number of flights in the first four months of 2026, indicating LAPD has accelerated the program’s use significantly.

    The report comes as activists and media have questioned the department’s use of drones during recent protests against federal immigration enforcement.

    The Intercept reported last week that a public portal tracking drone flight data captured the department conducting more than 30 drone flights during the Jan. 31 ICE Out protest in downtown. About the same number of flights were documented during the March 28 No Kings protest. 

    Several people at the commission meeting and on social media have made similar statements about seeing drone activity at protests. Some have called on the department to restrict its use of various surveillance technologies, including drones, saying they can be used to identify people vulnerable to the federal government’s immigration enforcement activities. 

    “Would you acknowledge that there are concerns in the community regarding privacy issues and whether the drones are used to record activity for the purpose of identifying participants?” Commissioner Teresa Sánchez-Gordon asked on Tuesday.

    Hackman responded that the drones flying over peaceful protests aimed to provide the LAPD with “crowd awareness, crowd behavior assessments and crowd size assessments.”

    “We’re not interested in recording or filming my face to try and later identify me,” he said.

    Hackman added that one of the drone flights at the March 28 protest was in response to a report of a person possibly throwing objects at people and police.

    The department’s drone policy states officers cannot use drones to record or photograph “First Amendment assemblies for the purpose of identifying participants not engaged in unlawful conduct.” And Hackman reiterated to the commissioners that the department did not record anyone who was not suspected of any crime, though he did not say if the March 28 drone flight recorded members of the crowd.

    Hackman added that the drones operate in much the same way that the department has used police lookouts and helicopters to watch crowds in the past. 

    The LAPD launched its Drone as First Responder pilot program last summer, which it said aimed to test deploying unmanned aircraft to calls for service before police officers could arrive. The drones have video and recording capabilities, and LAPD has said they are used to survey scenes to see if people are armed, or if police don’t need to respond at all. That pilot program was later made permanent, and a more than $2 million donation was recently approved by the L.A. City Council to purchase more drones and other equipment.

    The Echo Park Neighborhood Council submitted a letter to the City Council last month in opposition to the drone program expansion. 

    “LAPD’s track record shows a pattern of misusing existing tools: riot gear, tear gas, and less-lethal ammunition have been deployed against peaceful protesters, World Series celebrators, and ordinary residents,” wrote Windy O’Malley on behalf of the neighborhood council. “There is no demonstrated correlation between LAPD’s continued growth and a safer Los Angeles.”

    The vast majority of the 3,000 flights last year were drones that deployed at calls for service before officers, including several hundred flights for training pilots. Additionally, the department’s SWAT team used drones 33 times during various operations. Its bomb and hazardous materials teams used them during seven operations.

    Commission President Rasha Gerges Shields asked, in light of department staffing worries, if it was possible to quantify how much money the drone program is saving the department by eliminating officers from some calls.

    Hackman said they are working on calculating that, but department officials have estimated, “about 10% of all calls could be handled by the [drones] arriving first on scene.”

    The post LAPD is using drones more than ever to watch crowds during protests and respond to calls appeared first on LA Local.

  • Network ordered to renew early after Kimmel joke

    Topline:

    The Federal Communications Commission has ordered The Walt Disney Company's ABC to seek early broadcast license renewals for the eight TV stations it owns amid backlash over Jimmy Kimmel's joke about Melania Trump.

    Why now: The move follows criticism from first lady Melania Trump who objected to a joke about her made by late night comedian Jimmy Kimmel. President Trump followed up with a social media post calling for Kimmel to be fired. The FCC is ordering Disney and ABC to file a license renewal application for the stations within 30 days. Those licenses were not scheduled for renewal until 2028 at the earliest.

    Disney and Dems respond: In a statement, a Disney spokesperson said the company has always complied with FCC rules and is confident it meets the qualifications to remain a license holder. The new FCC order is drawing scrutiny from Democrats on Capitol Hill and others in Washington. "The FCC has just pulled out a sword to hang over every single news organization in America," Sen. Elizabeth Warren told NPR. "And to say: you report things that Donald Trump doesn't like and your entire station, your entire outfit, your entire business model could just disappear in the blink of an eye."

    The Federal Communications Commission has ordered The Walt Disney Company's ABC to seek early broadcast license renewals for the eight TV stations it owns.

    The move follows criticism from first lady Melania Trump who objected to a joke about her made by late night comedian Jimmy Kimmel. President Donald Trump followed up with a social media post calling for Kimmel to be fired.

    As the early license renewal order went out, FCC Chair Brendan Carr criticized ABC's parent company, Disney. Speaking on a podcast hosted by Katie Miller — whose husband is White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller — Carr said there are multiple ways the FCC can handle broadcast licenses.

    "You can accelerate when a license comes due and say, 'hey, we have significant concerns with the value of conducting your operations. We want to review your license now and decide if you're in the public interest,'" Carr said. "If we find that a broadcast hasn't been doing that, then the statute requires us to issue a hearing designation order."

    Carr criticized Disney's diversity, equity and inclusion policies, but did not specifically mention Jimmy Kimmel Live!

    The FCC's order comes after Kimmel made a joke during a sketch on his late night show — a mock speech for an alternative White House Correspondents' Dinner. "Our first lady Melania is here. So beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow," Kimmel quipped.

    The sketch aired three days before the actual White House Correspondents' Dinner, when a heavily armed man allegedly attempted to enter the ballroom where President Trump and other senior members of the administration were present. The suspect, Cole Allen, was charged Monday with attempting to assassinate the president.

    In a post on X, Melania Trump called Kimmel's joke about her "hateful and violent" and urged ABC — which airs his show — to take action.

    Kimmel responded on his show the following Monday, defending the joke. "Obviously [it] was a joke about their age difference, and the look of joy we see on her face every time they're together." He said it was a "light roast" and was "not, by any stretch of the definition, a call to assassination. And they know that." Kimmel added that he's been very vocal for many years against gun violence.

    This is not the first time, Kimmel, ABC or Disney have faced backlash from the Trump administration. In September, Disney briefly suspended Kimmel's show after the comedian said the "MAGA gang" was trying to score political points from the assassination of Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk. The comments prompted a backlash from conservatives, and Carr warned that the FCC could take action against ABC affiliates that continued airing the show.

    "Look, we can do this the easy way or the hard way," Carr said on a podcast hosted by Benny Johnson in September. "These companies can find ways to change conduct … or there's going to be additional work for the FCC ahead."

    Kimmel's show was reinstated six days later after leading entertainment figures and even conservatives, including Senator Ted Cruz criticized Kimmel's sidelining.

    Now, the FCC is ordering Disney and ABC to file a license renewal application for the stations within 30 days. Those licenses were not scheduled for renewal until 2028 at the earliest.

    In a statement, a Disney spokesperson said the company has always complied with FCC rules and is confident it meets the qualifications to remain a license holder.

    The new FCC order is drawing scrutiny from Democrats on Capitol Hill and others in Washington. "The FCC has just pulled out a sword to hang over every single news organization in America," Sen. Elizabeth Warren told NPR. "And to say: you report things that Donald Trump doesn't like and your entire station, your entire outfit, your entire business model could just disappear in the blink of an eye."

    FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez, the commission's lone Democrat, wrote in a statement, "This is the most egregious action this FCC has taken in violation of the First Amendment to date." The commissioner added, "As part of its ongoing campaign of censorship and control, the White House called publicly for the silencing of a vocal critic, and this FCC has now answered that call."

    First Amendment advocates have also weighed in, "this is all an exercise to intimidate broadcasters," Andrew J. Schwartzman, a longtime public interest media lawyer, told NPR.

    Schwartzman said the process of early license renewal could take years and could ultimately result in broadcasters losing their licenses, calling it "harassment." He went on to say that, "Brendan Carr knows full well that he lacks any legitimate legal basis for taking action against these broadcasters. He's trying to harass and bludgeon them," Schwartzman said.

    Schwartzman is representing a group of former FCC chairs and the Radio Television Digital News Association, which filed a petition in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The group is asking the FCC to repeal its News Distortion policy, which Schwartzman argues is being used to influence coverage, including commentary from figures like Kimmel.
    Copyright 2026 NPR