Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • New LAFD chief supports full investigation
    Fire engulfs a hillside next to a homes.
    Flames close in on homes threatened by the wind-driven Palisades Fire in Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7.

    Topline:

    Newly tapped L.A. Fire Department Chief Jamie Moore says he supports a full investigation into how LAFD handled the Lachman Fire. Moore made the comments during a meeting of the L.A. City Council's Public Safety Committee on Wednesday.

    Why it matters: Mayor Karen Bass called for a full investigation into the Lachman Fire last month. LAFD has been criticized for its handling of the Palisades Fire, particularly following an internal report the department released, which found lapses in communication, training and preparedness.

    Why now: Mayor Bass has tapped Moore, a 30-year LAFD veteran, to be the new chief of LAFD in October. The move came months after Bass fired former chief Kristin Crowley over the department's response to the Palisades Fire.

    The backstory: The Lachman Fire, which started on New Year's Day 2025, was initially contained to 8 acres by helicopters and hand crews. The L.A. Times reports that LAFD firefighters told a battalion chief on Jan. 2 that the fire still was smoldering, but text messages showed they were told to leave anyway. Days later, as strong Santa Ana winds lashed the burn site, the fire reignited and became the Palisades Fire. It destroyed thousands of structures and left a dozen people dead.

  • Autonomous taxis now offering trips on freeways
    A white four-door sedan with a camera on top of it is zipping through a street
    A Waymo car drives along a street on March 1, 2023, in San Francisco. The company now is offering select freeway rides in Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles residents who want to take Waymo’s autonomous taxis beyond the city streets can do so now that the company is offering select trips on freeways throughout the L.A. area. The move comes after Waymo conducted test rides in the region with company employees for nearly a year .

    Why now: The company announced Wednesday that it will start offering freeway trips to users in L.A., San Francisco and Phoenix.

    Waymo was given the regulatory go-ahead by the California Public Utilities Commission last year to drive on freeways in L.A.'s 120-square mile service area, which currently spans from Santa Monica to Echo Park.

    How it works: People who use the Waymo app can now opt into a “freeway list” of riders interested in “being among the first to experience a freeway ride directly in the app,” according to the company.

    Waymo said riders will be matched with freeway routes when they're “meaningfully faster” than the surface streets. Before a trip is confirmed in the app, users will receive a notification if the route they’ve selected doesn’t involve freeways.

    What officials say: Dmitri Dolgov, co-CEO of Waymo, said fully autonomous freeway rides are easy to conceive but “hard to truly master.” He said the company is proud to begin offering the option.

    “This milestone is a powerful testament to the maturity of our operations and technology,” he said in a statement.

    What's next: Freeway routes will gradually roll out to more users over time, according to the company. Waymo didn’t immediately respond to LAist’s request for an interview.

    LAist took the self-driving cars for a test ride from downtown L.A. to Koreatown last fall and reviewed our experience . We may try out a freeway route as well.

    Read on … Waymo is taking on LA freeways. Keep calm and carry on

  • Sponsored message
  • Artists ask labels to geo-block their music

    Topline:

    Since September, more than 1,000 artists and labels including Lorde, Björk and Massive Attack have joined an international initiative to remove their music from Israel. The boycott, called No Music for Genocide, is straightforward: artists are asking their labels and distributors to geo-block their music so it cannot be streamed in Israel.

    Why now: According to the movement's website, this act is "just one step toward honoring Palestinian demands to isolate and delegitimize Israel." Despite a fragile ceasefire currently in place, No Music for Genocide organizers say they're continuing the boycott amidst additional airstrikes in Gaza.

    Historic precedents: The No Music for Genocide movement, which is a decentralized volunteer network of musicians and labels, cites the success of cultural boycotts against South Africa during apartheid as a major inspiration. While artists like Hugh Masekela and Miriam Makeba made music a core tenet of anti-apartheid activism, international artists also played an important role. In 1985, E Street Band guitarist Steven Van Zandt led dozens of musicians, including Bruce Springsteen, Miles Davis and Rubén Blades, in the Artists United Against Apartheid effort to record "Sun City." The hit single referred to a luxury whites-only resort where artists including Queen and Linda Ronstadt had performed; the song's lyrics criticized their actions and pledged to avoid playing there until the end of apartheid.

    Since September, more than 1,000 artists and labels including Lorde , Björk and Massive Attack have joined an international initiative to remove their music from Israel. The boycott, called No Music for Genocide, is straightforward: Artists are asking their labels and distributors to geo-block their music so it cannot be streamed in Israel. According to the movement's website , this act is "just one step toward honoring Palestinian demands to isolate and delegitimize Israel." Despite a fragile ceasefire currently in place, No Music for Genocide organizers say they're continuing the boycott amidst additional airstrikes in Gaza.

    "Boycott is one of the most effective and enduring efforts that one can take to fight a militarized, overtly violent, three-headed monster of a system," blues poet Aja Monet , one of the participants, tells NPR. "We're in a place where capitalism rules everything. The most effective thing we can do is to be strategic about where we put our resources."

    The musicians' coalition coincides with a similar pledge from some Hollywood stars to boycott Israel's state-funded film industry. In September, an independent United Nations commission of inquiry concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and that countries helping to arm the Israeli government, like the United States, are complicit in the violence. Israel strongly denies that it is committing genocide — and some Israelis say the artists' efforts are misguided, because the boycott affects even those who oppose the war. In a statement to NPR, the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. condemned the musician-led protest.

    "The attempt to boycott Israeli culture under the banner of 'No Music for Genocide' is discriminatory, immoral and misguided," reads the statement. "Such boycotts do nothing to advance peace or improve the lives of either Israelis or Palestinians. On the contrary, they deepen division and harm the very people they claim to support."

    Although the State Department also rejected the U.N. report, some American musicians are demanding action and accountability over the U.S. government's role in the attacks.

    "As a U.S citizen, I have a connection to this genocide that is happening using my tax dollars. As a musician, I am sensitive — I think that is necessary for making art," composer and singer-songwriter Julia Holter , another participant in the campaign, said in a statement shared with NPR. "Every day for over a year and a half now, we have seen horror stories abound in Gaza, and every malnourished baby I see with horrific injuries, every mother or father I see hovered over their child targeted by a sniper makes me think of my child, makes me think of anyone I have ever loved. I feel a responsibility to do something, however small it may be."

    Historic precedents 

    The No Music for Genocide movement, which is a decentralized volunteer network of musicians and labels, cites the success of cultural boycotts against South Africa during apartheid as a major inspiration. While artists like Hugh Masekela and Miriam Makeba made music a core tenet of anti-apartheid activism, international artists also played an important role. In 1985, E Street Band guitarist Steven Van Zandt led dozens of musicians, including Bruce Springsteen , Miles Davis and Rubén Blades , in the Artists United Against Apartheid effort to record "Sun City." The hit single referred to a luxury whites-only resort where artists including Queen and Linda Ronstadt had performed; the song's lyrics criticized their actions and pledged to avoid playing there until the end of apartheid.

    In 2023, artists ranging from Pedro Pascal to Quinta Brunson called for a ceasefire amidst the conflict in Gaza, but No Music for Genocide is a musician-led boycott. In a statement shared with NPR, vocalist, guitarist and boycott participant Marisa Dabice of the band Mannequin Pussy said mainstream artists could make a real difference.

    "Without the participation of major label artists, this boycott cannot grow in the way it needs to make the largest possible impact," she wrote. "We live in a day and age where unified direct action can make an impact —- we just have to be focused and unrelenting."

    The No Music for Genocide website notes that all three major U.S. labels — Sony Music, Warner Music Group and Universal Music Group — ceased operations in Russia shortly after the invasion of Ukraine and pledged to support humanitarian relief efforts. The group argues the same should be done on behalf of Palestinians.

    Yasir Razak of the shoegaze band Nabeel, one of the artists geo-blocking his music from Israel, says he sees a link between the war in Gaza and the way Western powers have historically intervened in the Middle East. Razak was born in Baghdad around the time of the first Gulf War and grew up in the U.S. during the Iraq War. Although the Iraq War and the current conflict are markedly different, he says, they're not entirely separate.

    "What makes me most sad is the idea that folks in other countries can't be seen," he says, adding that this is often the case with people from the Middle East. "We've gone to great lengths to dehumanize them to the point where we can carry out these kinds of attacks against the majority popular opinion."

    In September, a New York Times and Siena University poll found that a majority of American voters oppose continued U.S. economic and military support for Israel in the war, a reversal from public opinion shortly after the Hamas-led attacks in Israel on Oct. 7 in 2023, which killed 1,200 people according to the Israeli government. In July, a Gallup poll found that 60% of Americans disapprove of Israel's military actions in Gaza which have killed more than 67,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.

    Razak says he has mostly received positive feedback from his fans for participating in the boycott. One downside, he notes, is that some digital service providers include Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories in the geo-block as part of Israel. After hearing directly from an affected listener, Razak found a workaround to provide free downloads of his music on the music distribution platform Bandcamp. But he says beyond the logistics of where the music is or isn't accessible, there is an underlying anxiety that comes with publicly voicing his stance against the Israeli state. (Several artists NPR reached out to declined to comment on the boycott).

    "Ultimately, this is a humanitarian issue. We've all been seeing videos coming out of Gaza. We've heard members of the Israeli government speaking about what their intentions are. I think any right-minded person would look at that and say this is something to take a stand against," Razak says. "But the attempt to conflate that in any way with hatred or antisemitism has been so dangerous and paralyzing, and fear-inducing for those of us who really feel like there's a moral obligation for us to stand against."

    Backlash against musicians

    In April, Cornell University dropped R&B singer Kehlani as the headliner of a campus concert. In a statement , University President Michael I. Kotlikoff wrote that Kehlani "espoused antisemitic, anti-Israel sentiments in performances, videos, and on social media." Kehlani has been an outspoken advocate for Palestinians; the video for their 2024 song "Next 2 U" features a quote from Palestinian-American poet Hala Alyan, along with the phrase "Long Live the Intifada." (The Arabic word generally translates to "uprising" and has a long history within the context of the war in Gaza.)

    During their performance at NPR's Tiny Desk last year, Kehlani wore a keffiyeh — the traditional Arab headdress that's become a symbol for Palestinians — and stopped to address the audience. "I want to take a second to say: Free Palestine. Free Congo. Free Sudan. Free Yemen. Free Hawaii. Free Guam," Kehlani said. "It's deeper than this. I need everybody that's here right now, everybody that's watching, to step up, to use their voices."

    After Cornell's decision, New York nonprofit City Parks Foundation, which organizes the SummerStage concert series, also cancelled Kehlani's scheduled Pride performance following pressure from the mayor's office and citing "security concerns." Brooklyn-based rapper MIKE , who is participating in No Music for Genocide, curates an annual hip-hop festival in partnership with SummerStage. He tells NPR he cancelled this year's edition in solidarity with Kehlani.

    "You have to sacrifice for a bigger purpose," he says. "One of the things that I see people trying to do with hip-hop is further detach it from its political foundation, its anti-establishment foundation."

    MIKE says music played a key role in shaping his political awareness, and he hopes his involvement in the geo-block movement stirs something in listeners. He's already received messages from fans in Israel over the removal of his music; he says he hopes the boycott inspires deeper reflection on the oppression of Palestinians and all peoples.

    Impact on Israeli music fans

    But on the ground in Israel, the boycott has led to some confusion. Linda Dayan, a reporter for Haaretz based in Tel Aviv, says that while most participating artists' music has been pulled from SoundCloud, several discographies are still available on other streaming platforms like Spotify. Dayan says blocking the music is "just a punishment" for the many Israelis who have long-opposed the war in Gaza.

    "I think if [artists] really do want to make an impact, they should be putting their money behind their morals when it comes to either donating to initiatives that ensure that Gazans can get the aid that they so badly need, and organizations — especially within Israel — who are doing this work on the ground, who are organizing these protests," Dayan says.

    She points to groups like Standing Together , a grassroots organization of Palestinian and Jewish citizens of Israel working to promote peace and unity. Dayan says she worries that instead of bringing people together, the boycott could further alienate Israelis.

    "There is a really big narrative among the Netanyahu government and among factions of the right: 'They don't hate you because of what we do, they hate you because of who you are,'" Dayan says. "These boycotts that target wide swathes of people without considering the work that they're personally doing with Palestinians, the work that they are doing against the government or toward a just peace is giving credence to that idea."

    For several participating artists, No Music for Genocide is not an end-all solution, but they say it's an important form of nonviolent action. Aja Monet says the boycott is only one part of a much larger collective resistance.

    "Just as much as we're talking about what's happening in Palestine, we're talking about the rising state of fascism in this country," she says. "We're talking about poverty. We're talking about the books that are being banned. We're talking about the immigrant community that's being attacked and kidnapped from their homes in their street corners. All of this is from the same arm of violence and threat and terror. All of those things concern us and we want an end to it."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • LA County investigates handling of fire claims
    A State Farm insurance sign leans against the remains of a burnt building
    A State Farm insurance sign in rubble from the Palisades Fire on Jan. 16.

    Topline:

    L.A. County’s top lawyer has announced an investigation into State Farm after months of complaints over its handling of January fire claims.

    About the probe: County Counsel Dawyn Harrison said the investigation is about making sure State Farm customers are being treated fairly. Her office is looking at multiple complaints, including whether the insurer is creating delays by switching adjusters and failing to reimburse living expenses.

    The backstory: Fire survivors have reported major issues with State Farm, including higher rates of denials, lowball estimates and poor communication. It comes as the state also is investigating the insurer for the same issues.

    What’s next: The company has until Nov. 20 to respond to the county’s demands for claim information.

    State Farm is facing another investigation into its handling of Eaton and Palisades fire insurance claims, Los Angeles County’s top attorney announced Thursday.

    The civil investigation is focusing on “potential violations” of the state’s unfair competition law , which prohibits unlawful or unfair business practices, the Office of County Counsel said.

    “We are committed to thoroughly investigating State Farm’s actions and making sure they are treating claimants fairly and resolving their claims quickly and in full compliance with the law,” County Counsel Dawyn Harrison said in a statement.

    How we got here

    The move comes as the insurance giant already is dealing with a state probe into the same issue. Some residents have raised concerns that State Farm isn’t moving fast enough.

    “In the absence of state leadership, today's county investigation is a major step forward,” the Eaton Fire Survivors Network said in a statement. “It matters not only for Los Angeles fire survivors but for every Californian who pays premiums and expects the protection they paid for when disaster strikes.”

    Customers have reported much higher rates of denials, lowball claim estimates, poor communication and challenges with multiple adjusters, according to a third-party survey of fire survivors.

    State Farm won the first emergency rate hike in the state earlier this year. The company told officials it was in financial distress and expected to pay more than $7 billion in January fire claims.

    Signs of that came back in July, when a nearly $900,000 check for an Altadena resident was put on hold because of insufficient funds.

    About the investigation

    In response to the investigation, State Farm said it has been "cooperating fully" with the California Department of Insurance.

    "The goals of this investigation by L.A. County are unclear, but what is clear is that it will be another distraction from our ongoing work in California to help our customers recover from this tragedy," the company said in an update , alongside a list of actions it's taken.

    The county counsel has sent State Farm a letter with demands for claim information. It says the investigation is looking at a number of alleged problems, including:

    • Timely communications
    • Switching adjusters, resulting in delays
    • Misrepresenting policy language
    • Failing to reimburse survivors’ living expenses
    • Failing to disclose estimate documents upon request
    • Not reasonably investigating smoke damage or paying for testing and remediation

    County officials have given State Farm until Nov. 20 to respond. As California’s largest private insurance provider, State Farm manages more than 2.8 million residential and commercial policies statewide.

  • City will rename street after activist
    An Asian man wearing glasses and a dark suit holds up a pen and looks to the side.
    Mayor Chi Charlie Nguyen proposed the renaming of a street in Westminster after slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

    Topline:

    In the latest culture war to hit Westminster city hall, the City Council on Wednesday voted to rename a street after Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist who was shot and killed in September, and designate Oct. 14 in his honor.

    Why it matters: The vote came despite the majority of public speakers at the meeting calling it a political move meant to serve congressional ambitions at a time when city leaders should be focusing on serious ongoing financial challenges.

    How we got here: Westminster has flirted with filing for bankruptcy numerous times in the last few years and one reason observers and residents say they haven't been able to address the issues is because City Council meetings get pulled into culture wars and in fighting .

    In the latest culture war to hit Westminster city hall, the City Council on Wednesday voted to rename a street after Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist who was shot and killed in September, and designate Oct. 14 in his honor.

    The vote came despite the majority of public speakers at the meeting calling it a political move meant to serve congressional ambitions at a time when city leaders should be focusing on serious ongoing financial challenges.

    Westminster has flirted with filing for bankruptcy numerous times in the past few years, and one reason observers and residents say they haven't been able to address the issues is because City Council meetings get pulled into culture wars and in fighting .

    Mayor Chi Charlie Nguyen, who proposed changing All American Way to Charlie Kirk Way, said it would “honor someone who has encouraged a new generation to care about their country, to get involved and to speak up for what they believe in.”

    “This is freedom of speech,” he said. “Charlie Kirk’s message has inspired countless young Americans to think critically, serve their communities and appreciate the freedom we enjoy.”

    In September, Kirk, a right-wing activist and ally of President Donald Trump, was fatally shot during an outdoor speaking event at Utah Valley University. Kirk rose to fame for espousing right-wing Christian values and connecting with young people on college campuses.

    But Councilmember Carlos Manzo, the sole voice of dissent on the dais against the street renaming, said the move  was just “exploiting a tragedy for political gain.” He pointed out that Nguyen and Councilmember Amy Phan West are running for Congress in 2026 and using their nonpartisan council seats to spotlight “national divisive issues” that they can use to campaign on a Republican platform.

    Public weighs in

    A cross section of city residents, including self-identified conservative Republicans, spoke out against the proposals, calling them a waste of money and time.

    “ I am against spending tax dollars to name the street after Charlie, as much as I like him,” said Michael Verrengia, a longtime Westminster resident and veteran. “He didn't live in Westminster. He didn't do anything for Westminster.”

    Another resident, Tammy Hamill, called the move “campaigning from the dais.”

    “You guys are putting this stuff on there to get the word out to your party leaders,” she said.

    Westminster residents approved increasing the city’s sales tax in 2022 and again in 2024 to save the city from filing for bankruptcy. Hamill said residents reluctantly voted for those tax increases to save the city from filing bankruptcy, not to spend on “pet projects.”

    Others suggested the council use the $3,000 allocated to renaming the street toward youth programming or honoring the Mendez family. In the 1940s, the Mendez family in Westminster successfully challenged the segregation of Mexican American children in California schools, which was used as a precedent for the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision that desegregated schools across the country.