Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Does The Supreme Court Ruling On DACA Open Up Applications Again? Questions Remain

In 2017, Los Angeles teenager Rotzely had just turned 15, making her eligible for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the Obama-era program that shields many young immigrants from deportation and allows them to work legally in the U.S..
That was also the year President Trump entered office. In September 2017, Trump announced he was dismantling the program known as DACA, which at its height enrolled 800,000 young people without legal immmigration status who were brought to the U.S. as children.
Rotzely, who asked LAist not to use her last name for fear of deportation, was devastated that she had to put aside the application she had started.
"It was just overall scary because I had no protection and during that time I felt that anytime me and my family could be broken up," said Rotzely, who came with her parents from Mexico when she was three months old.
Now, nearly three years later, Rotzely is straightening out her application. The Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling Thursday upheld DACA, saying that the Trump administration had acted in an "arbitrary" and "capricious" way in how it tried to end the program.
That's good news for the 650,000 immigrants currently in the DACA program -- including an estimated 200,000 in California. They've been able to renew their DACA status -- which is good for two years -- even as the program has teetered in legal limbo since 2017, with lower courts blocking the rescission and the Trump administration appealing those decisions.
Legal experts said they believe the ruling also opens the program up to new applicants like Rotzely.
"The memo (from the Trump administration) that was terminating DACA has been vacated," said Araceli Martínez-Olguín, supervising attorney with the National Immigration Law Center. "What that leaves is the original memo that announced DACA in the first place. So USCIS should soon be accepting (applications) and processing them."

But U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the agency responsible for processing DACA applications, has not commented yet on whether it will accept new applicants -- let alone when. There was no guidance provided in a statement from the agency today. Instead it focused on the Supreme Court ruling:
"Today's court opinion has no basis in law and merely delays the President's lawful ability to end the illegal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty program."
"I don't know what that means in terms of how much staff power they're going to give to any new applications that come in," Cianciarulo said.
At Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles, Victoria Dominguez is advising would-be applicants to have a conversation first with an immigration specialist at organizations like hers. She expects that more people will inquire about applying to DACA in the coming days and weeks.
"Hopefully by that time, we're going to have more information from the USCIS regarding the kind of procedures and protocols moving forward," Dominguez said.

But some other immigrant rights groups aren't waiting for federal guidelines before submitting DACA applications they've helped prepare.
At the Coalition For Humane Rights of Los Angeles, or CHIRLA, legal services director Luis Perez said Thursday he was putting together a package of DACA applications that have been sitting in their files since 2017.
"Even though we have no instructions, we know this to be the right thing," Perez said.
THE BACK STORY
It's been eight years this week since the Obama administration first announced the DACA program. By August 2012, the first applications were in. DACA recipients have included young immigrants born not only in Latin America, but from a long list of countries including South Korea, the Philippines, India, Poland and Nigeria.
In the time leading up to the Supreme Court's decision, organizations like CHIRLA were advising existing DACA recipients to renew their protection before it expired. The thinking? That if the court were to rule unfavorably, this could at least buy them some time before their protection was phased out.
On Thursday, immigrant advocates renewed that call, warning that the administration could still try to dismantle DACA, especially if Trump is re-elected.
Rotzely said she used to be scared of Trump after he rescinded DACA.
"I felt like he could do anything with his power, that he could always come after me," she said.
But in the years since she has gotten involved in organizing and joined CHIRLA. And she said that she's hopeful once she gets DACA, she will be able to get a job and afford to buy treats and gifts for her younger siblings.
But even if the Supreme Court did not rule for DACA recipients, she said she knew she was going to be okay.
"I found a way to fight myself, and finally give myself a voice," Rotzely said.
WE LOVE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.