Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Extraordinary Warner Bros. Decision To Stream Its Films Might be Great for Couch Potatoes, But Fatal for Theaters
Timothée Chalamet and Rebecca Ferguson in "Dune." (Credit: Warner Bros)
()
Movie theater owners have been living through one of the worst years ever, as their multi-billion dollar business has effectively vanished. And now their pandemic predicament has become about as terrifying as any Hollywood horror tale.
That’s because Warner Bros. is taking its entire slate of 17 films set for theatrical release next year and shifting them to its parent company’s nascent streaming platform, HBO Max, where the films will be simultaneously available for streaming and in theaters (both Warners and HBO are part of the media division of parent company AT&T).
That may be welcome news for many couch potatoes, who for the price of an HBO subscription will be able to stream everything in the studio’s lineup for the next year, including a new “Matrix” sequel, “Dune,” “In the Heights” and “The Suicide Squad.”
But it wasn't seen as good news on Wall Street. Minutes after Warners' announcement last week about its 2021 slate, the stock market price of big chains such as AMC and Cinemark plummeted.
Support for LAist comes from
Typically, theater owners will not book any movie that will appear on a streaming or pay-per-view site sooner than some three months after its theatrical debut. But that’s not the business model for companies such as Netflix, which prefer simultaneous releases, and it’s why the biggest theater chains wouldn’t show the streaming company’s “Roma” or “The Irishman.”
Ann Sarnoff, the head of WarnerMedia Studios, said this concurrent digital/theatrical model will only last a year and was necessitated by the pandemic.
Even if Warners’ 2021 titles (along with this month’s “Wonder Woman 1984”) run simultaneously at the multiplex, it’s hard to imagine a lot of customers risking a trip to a theater -- and forking out $8 for popcorn and $5 for a soda -- over the safety of their living rooms, where the snacks and drinks are a lot cheaper.
And the company's release strategy could signal a fundamental shift in how movies are distributed going forward, as other studios follow suit.
While the Warners decision was the most sweeping, other prominent distributors have pulled movies from planned theatrical releases and made them available digitally. Universal did so with its “Trolls World Tour” and “King of Staten Island” movies, and Disney followed suit with “Hamilton” and “Mulan.” Universal and Disney both have upstart streaming platforms: Peacock and Disney Plus.
On KPCC’s AirTalk on Monday, Greg Laemmle, the president and CEO of Laemmle Theatres, said the Warners decision will create more trouble for exhibitors who already have been “devastated” by the pandemic.
“It's going to create some increased competition, because people will have other options and not be forced into waiting for 90 days or some arbitrary number before they can see something at home,” Laemmle said. His chain has already been forced to sell some of its real estate to stay solvent.
Support for LAist comes from
READ MORE:
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletter. To support our nonprofit public service journalism: Donate now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist