Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
It's Official: Soon You Can Take Uber And Lyft Rides From LAX
Arrivals at LAX (Photo by ckramer via the Creative Commons on Flickr)
()
After A LOT of back and forth and delays, the L.A. City Council has finally made a decision: ride-sharing companies like Uber and Lyft will soon be able to pick passengers up from LAX.
This would make L.A. the largest airport in the country to allow companies like Uber and Lyft to fully operate legally, and it could start happening as early as the fall, City News Service reports. The council members took their final vote today, 9-6 in favor of the ride-sharing companies getting to apply for permits to pick up folks from the arrivals area at LAX, something they were previously banned from doing, the L.A. Times reports. While they were able to drop passengers off at the airport, picking them up was something that only transportation services—like taxis, shuttles and limos—with proper permits were allowed to do.
The ride-sharing companies would have to apply for the permits through the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC), and follow other requirements including paying a $4 per pickup fee, carrying insurance policies with specific coverage, and pay a monthly licensing fee. The permit process could take up to 30 days, according to CBS Los Angeles.
Councilman Mike Bonin, who's in favor of ride-sharing services operating at LAX, told City News Service, "People are baffled by the fact they can take a ride-share to the airport but can’t take one home from the airport." He added that this new policy will be a good thing for LAX passengers, who have "suffered too long with too few choices."
Support for LAist comes from
In July, the Airport Commission voted unanimously to approve allowing ride-sharing services' drivers pick passengers up from the airport, but that was delayed earlier this month when council members voted to review the commission's plan. One of the main concerns was that drivers for the ride-sharing apps do not undergo the same background checks as taxi drivers.
Council member Mitch O’Farrell, who voted against the ride-sharing decision today, has voiced concerns about how the competition is unfair since taxi companies have much more stringent rules and background checks they have to follow in comparison to companies like Uber and Lyft. "I see no reason whatsoever why the rush," O’Farrell told the Times. "What we have on the table, in my view, is a series of inequalities, and a double standard. I can’t in good conscience support that.”
The City Council agreed to ask the PUC to include new polices that require fingerprinting from the ride-share company drivers in their background checks, something that taxi drivers already have to do. Limo and shuttle drivers, who don't have to do that, would also be included in these potential new requirements.
The next step is for the city and the companies to agree on guidelines and contracts, but it sounds like that's not too far away.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago. -
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
Best of LAist