Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

City Council Approves Construction At The Target Husk For The Third Time

target_husk.jpg
The Target was ordered to halt construction over a year ago (Photo via Target Husk)
We need to hear from you.
Today during our spring member drive, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. The local news you read here every day is crafted for you, but right now, we need your help to keep it going. In these uncertain times, your support is even more important. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership. Thank you.

The L.A. City Council voted unanimously on Wednesday to re-approve the the construction of Target Husk, the as-of-yet unfinished commercial development presently dominating the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Western Avenue with its bare steel bones. This is technically the third time the city has approved the construction of the Target store.

The council's vote rewrites planning and zoning provisions that regulate the area where the Target has been partially built. Where the law once only allowed for a building 35 feet tall, the new rules stipulate it's perfectly legal to build a 74 foot tall development, like the Target's skeleton, on the site, according to the L.A. Times.

By now, drama surrounding the Target Husk's construction has protracted the development's construction for several years. L.A. City Council first approved the Target back in 2010. A pair of individual neighborhood NIMBYs halted the development with a lawsuit before it began after they (correctly) pointed out neither Target nor the City of Los Angeles had conducted an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), according to Curbed L.A.

Target conducted the appropriate EIR, and the building was once again approved for construction in late 2012. Construction began, but a pair of community groups filed a lawsuit against the Target, arguing that the building violated height limits established in the Vermont/Western Specific Plan. Where the plan, which governs development in the area the Target was partially built, stipulates buildings may only be 35 feet tall on the disputed property, the Target Husk had already risen to 74 feet.

Support for LAist comes from

A judge agreed with the litigants, and ordered the Target's construction halted in 2014. Since then, Target Husk has cast its partially completed shadow over Sunset and Western while the city tries to figure out how to to grandfather the half-built beast into legality.

That, more or less, boils down to changing the laws that govern construction on the particular site in a process called 'spot-zoning.' The city council approved new zoning laws on Wednesday, theoretically paving the way for a conflict-free construction process from here forward. Another problem, relating to requirements for Target to provide child care for its employees, will be solved with a fee paid by Target to support area child care.

What will inevitably happen is another lawsuit. Or at least says Doug Haines, one of the two litigants in the first lawsuit, and a member of the La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association which is responsible for the second.

"It's just going to go back to court," said Haines to the L.A. Times. "Rather than change the project to comply with the judge's orders, [the city] just decided to change the law."

Of course Hollywood Councilman Mitch O'Farrell knows this is coming. "This process underwent such scrutiny that I'm sure we will be on firm legal ground next time around," he said to the Times.

At least somebody is happy:

Most Read