Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

The Curious Case of SoCalians Who Are Okay With Drinking Poo Water

poopywater.jpg
Toilet via Shutterstock

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

This week the New York Times checked in with the curious case of San Diegans who are no longer afraid of drinking water that was once in someone's toilet.Back in 1998 when San Diego's water department brought up the idea of using reclaimed water—wastewater that has been treated so that it is safe to drink—the city council refused to even consider the possibility. Residents weren't hot on the idea of so-called "toilet-to-tap" water. Even in 2004 after the idea had time to sink in, 63 percent of San Diego residents were still opposed.

But then a drought came along and biotech leaders wrestling with a water shortage started talking about leaving San Diego. A few years ago the mayor got on board, the city council fell in line and public opinion began to change. By 2011, only 25 percent of residents were opposed to the idea. (The newspaper did find one resident who very unironically referred to the reclaimed water as "the end of the world." Virginia Soderberg, 91, president of the Convair Garden Club in San Diego, told the Times, "I wouldn’t even want my cat to drink it.”) You can take tours of the new treatment plant, which will be supplying water for San Diego residents soon.

To actually taste reclaimed water you'd have to go north to Orange County where the water department went on the offensive and did a much better job convincing folks that reclaimed water is safe—maybe even safer—than other sources of water. Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein took a tour of the reclaimed water plant in Orange County back in 2007 and came back a true believer, even chastising Mayor Villaraigosa for "allowing our precious poo-water to run out to sea." Here was his review of the water at the time:

At the end of the plant tour, I grabbed a plastic cup and filled it with the filtered water. I swirled and sniffed, partly to stall and partly to be a jerk. It had no odor at all. It tasted pretty awesome -- slightly sweet and crisp, almost like Deer Park. After some quick tests, we found out it had a concentration of dissolved solids (minerals) of 13 (San Pellegrino has 1,109) and a pH balance of 6.4 (San Pellegrino is 7.7) -- making it light and tasteless. Once the department adds some limestone and puts it into the aquifer, the water should end up a little heavier and less acidic. Right now it's young, like an unaged Chateau Palmer.

This kind of water is more expensive than groundwater (but less expensive than desalination) and getting over the public's psychological barrier of drinking water is obviously a chore. But the Times points out that San Diego and Orange County are just ahead of the curve. Other water departments around the country—especially those suffering from drought and worried about depleting groundwater—are looking into the idea of turning reclaimed water. Yes, one day we could all be drinking formerly-poopy water.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today