Measure EE would clean up outdated language in Santa Ana’s charter, give the city attorney and city clerk limited spending authority, and give the city council the authority to adopt new rules for investigating ethics violations.
Official title on the ballot: Measure EE
You are being asked: Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Ana be amended to delete references to obsolete job titles and obsolete bonding requirements, specify that all department heads are at-will employees, address definitions of funds and levies for compliance with state law, authorize limited purchasing authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney and require the City Council to adopt an ordinance to enforce the Ethics Code?
WHAT YOUR VOTE MEANS
A "yes" vote means: The charter will be amended.
A "no" vote means: The charter will not be amended.
Understanding Measure EE
Cities that have a charter, which is like a constitution for cities, can only amend that charter with majority approval by the city's voters. Many cities periodically review their charter to suggest changes such as removing outdated language and procedures, or to reflect new priorities.
Most of the amendments contained in Measure EE fall into the former category. For example, the measure calls for eliminating a section of the charter that calls for a capital improvements fund, in other words, money for maintenance, repairs and renovations of city property. The city currently already funds this kind of work through its regular budget and capital improvement plans go through the planning department and are reported to city council.
The amendment regarding purchasing power for the city clerk and city attorney would give these officers the ability to cut checks — within the limits of the city's purchasing policies — in the same way the city manager is currently able to cut checks up to $50,000 without getting prior approval from the city council.
More voter guides
City of Santa Ana
- Mayor and city council. Plus: Noncitizen voting, rent control and pay raises for city councilmembers
City of Irvine
- Mayor and city council
Orange County
- Board of Supervisors: Who will replace outgoing District 1 Supervisor Andrew Do?
- School district measures: School districts have a lot of repair needs.
State and federal races
- Whoa! There are 10 state-wide initiatives on the ballot. Here's your cheat sheet to Props. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36.
- Orange County races for California State Assembly and State Senate
- House and U.S. Senate
Jump to the full Voter Game Plan for dozens more races ▶
Proponents say all of these changes will "save taxpayer time and money." Some other O.C. cities also give city officials besides city managers a spending threshold. For example, the city attorney in Huntington Beach can spend up to $100,000 on outside counsel without city council approval.
As for the ethics provision, the city's current charter calls for forming an ad hoc city council committee to study individual reports of ethics violations from certain city officers. For other types of city officials, the city manager reviews the alleged violation.
In her report on the charter amendments proposal to city council, City Attorney Sonia Carvalho said the idea of having an ad hoc committee to study individual ethics violations "seemed like a good idea in theory but there have been inefficiencies in practice."
The ethics amendment up for a vote in Measure EE would allow the city council to adopt a new process for investigating ethics violations.
The history behind it
Earlier this year, the city convened an ad hoc committee of three city council members to discuss potential tweaks to the city's charter. The amendments contained in Measure EE are a result of that work.
The Santa Ana City Council unanimously agreed to put the amendments on the Nov. 5 ballot.
What people who support it say
Councilmembers Thai Viet Phan and Phil Bacerra authored the official statement in support of the ballot measure. They said the proposed charter amendments would "modernize and clarify outdated provisions, ensure conformance with applicable law and practices, and save taxpayer time and money."
What people who oppose it say
There is no opposition on file.
Potential financial impact
None reported.
Further reading
Read the city attorney's impartial analysis of the measure and the argument in favor on the city's website.
