Today is Giving Tuesday!

Give back to local trustworthy news; your gift's impact will go twice as far for LAist because it's matched dollar for dollar on this special day. 
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

Santa Ana Measure CC: Rent control and 'just cause' eviction

Measure CC would enshrine in Santa Ana’s charter the rent stabilization and 'just cause' eviction ordinance that's already in place.
A person's hand drops a ballot into a ballot box with a crest off the front of it that highlights a clutch of oranges and a view to snow-capped mountains and farmland in the background.
(
Erin Hauer / Dan Carino
/
LAist
)
This story features Beeline Reader for enhanced readability. Click to turn the feature on or off. Learn more about this technology here.

Measure CC would enshrine in Santa Ana’s charter the rent stabilization and "just cause" eviction ordinance already in place. The measure caps rent increases at 3% per year or 80% of the change in the consumer price index, whichever is less.

Official title on the ballot: Measure CC

You are being asked: Shall the measure adopting a Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Eviction Ordinance be adopted?

WHAT YOUR VOTE MEANS

A "yes" vote means: The ballot measure will be adopted and any future change to the rent stabilization and just cause eviction ordinance would have to be approved by voters. 

A "no" vote means: The ballot measure will not be adopted, but the city's existing rent stabilization and just cause eviction ordinance will remain in place. Potential future changes to the ordinance could be made by a majority vote of the city council.

Understanding Measure CC

The intent behind Measure CC is to have Santa Ana residents vote on the rent control measure the city council passed three years ago and amended in late 2022.

The history behind it

In 2021, Santa Ana became the first and only city in Orange County to adopt a rent control ordinance. The ordinance capped annual rent increases at 3% or 80% of the change in the consumer price index, whichever is less.

More voter guides

City of Santa Ana

City of Irvine

Orange County

State and federal races

Jump to the full Voter Game Plan for dozens more races ▶

The ordinance also made it illegal to evict a renter without "just cause." Some of the just cause reasons to evict include:

  • Failing to pay rent
  • Violating a material term of the lease (after being given a written notice to correct the violation)
  • Committing or permitting a nuisance
  • Criminal activity or criminal threat
  • Intent to occupy the property by the owner or owner's immediate family
  • Withdrawing the property from the rental market for at least two years
  • A government order regarding habitability of the property
  • Intent to demolish or substantially remodel

Under state law, single-family homes and apartments built after 1995 are exempt.

State law also trumps local law in terms of restrictions on rent increases for mobile homes — currently, no more than 3% annually plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 5%, whichever is less. Long-term rentals (more than a year), new mobile home parks and new spaces are exempt.

You can learn more about Santa Ana's rent stabilization and just cause eviction ordinance on the city's dedicated webpage here.

How it would work

If voters adopt the ballot measure, the city's rent control and just cause eviction rules could only be changed by voters. The city council would not be able to change the ordinance without voter approval.

If voters do not adopt the ballot measure, the city's existing rent control and just cause eviction rules will remain in place. But they could be changed with a majority vote by the current city council or a future city council.

What people who support it say 

Supporters say the city's rent control ordinance has worked to protect renters from predatory landlords and keep residents in their homes, especially low-income families, mobile home residents, and seniors on fixed incomes.

The official argument in support of Measure CC is signed by councilmembers Thai Viet Pham and Jonathan Ryan Hernandez, O.C. Supervisor and former Santa Ana Mayor Vicente Sarmiento, Richard Walker, directing attorney at the Public Law Center, and Mextli Lopez, a counselor with Tenants United Santa Ana.

What people who oppose it say

Opponents say the measure will lead to a decline in the quality of housing in Santa Ana, and puts vulnerable residents at risk by making it harder for landlords to evict potentially dangerous neighbors. They also say requiring voters to approve changes to the city's rent control ordinance will be expensive (because it would have to be put on a future ballot), and make it difficult to implement fixes.

The official argument in opposition to Measure CC is signed by Councilmember Phil Bacerra, former Mayor Miguel Pulido, Patricia Wenskunas, who's the founder of the organization Crime Survivors, and Donna Nguyen, who's a local property manager.

Potential financial impact

Opponents argue the measure will provoke lawsuits, potentially costing the city money.

Follow the money

As of early September, two mobile home industry groups had poured some $75,000 into opposing the rent control measure. The California Association of Realtors had donated another $49,000 to the opposition committee.

Further reading

  • Santa Ana's official city ballot measure resources page
  • Santa Ana's official rent stabilization and just cause eviction page
  • The "No on Measure CC" website
What questions do you have about this election?
You ask, and we'll answer: Whether it's about how to interpret the results or track your ballot, we're here to help you understand the 2024 general election on Nov. 5.

At LAist, we focus on what matters to our community: clear, fair, and transparent reporting that helps you make decisions with confidence and keeps powerful institutions accountable.

Today, on Giving Tuesday, your support for independent local news is critical. With federal funding for public media gone, LAist faces a $1.7 million yearly shortfall. Speaking frankly, how much reader support we receive now will determine the strength of this reliable source of local information now and for years to come.

This work is only possible with community support. Every investigation, service guide, and story is made possible by people like you who believe that local news is a public good and that everyone deserves access to trustworthy local information.

That’s why on this Giving Tuesday, we’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Thank you for understanding how essential it is to have an informed community and standing up for free press.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right