Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Celebrity Tabloids (Mostly) Agree To Kristen Bell's Boycott Of Paparazzi Baby Pics

kristenbell-daxshepard.jpg
Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell arrive at the L.A. premiere of' 'Hit & Run' on August 14, 2012. (Photo by Michael Buckner/Getty Images)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Kristen Bell and Dax Shepard's boycott of entertainment outlets that publish celebrity baby pictures just got two more high-profile supporters: People and Just Jared.

Bell and Shepard started their boycott in January after a number of publications scored guerilla-style photographs of their new baby. Prior to this, the couple had been notoriously secret about prying eyes peeking into their personal lives. California also passed a law that dishes out harsher penalties for paps who take pictures of famous kids. Now, the very same tabloids that Shepard and Bell targeted seem to be coming around, with Entertainment Tonight being the first to announce their support for the boycott last Friday.

People Editorial Director Jess Cagle said in a statement released today that while they still run baby photos as directed by their parents, unauthorized baby pictures taken by paparazzi will not be placed in the magazine, with exceptions, maybe:

Of course, we still run a lot of sanctioned photos - like exclusive baby pictures taken with the cooperation of celebrity parents, and photos of stars posing with their kids at events (like a red carpet) where they're expecting and willing to be photographed. But we have no interest in running kids' photos taken under duress. Of course, there may be rare exceptions based on the newsworthiness of photos. And there's always the tough balancing act we face when dealing with stars who exploit their children one day, and complain about loss of privacy the next.

Meanwhile, Just Jared released their own statement earlier today officially joining the ban. In a separate statement, founder Jared Eng called himself, "the first blogger to take this stance."

"I'm eager to join this very important initiative," Eng said in the statement. "Kids of public figures have a right to be respected as private citizens, so unauthorized photos will no longer have a place on our sites."

But as Jezebel points out, there are still paparazzi pics of celebrity babies that are peppered throughout both sites. People still has an entire section devoted to the posting of baby pics, and Just Jared, though not as frequent, still has seemingly unauthorized pictures of celebrities enjoying their day with their kids. Mind you, all of these pictures and articles were published before they joined the boycott.

Sponsored message

At least Bell and Shepard seem to be satisfied with these new developments:

Meanwhile, it looks like the paparazzi aren't too happy with Bell's boycott, announcing their displeasure in an incredibly creepy manner:

Sponsored message

Related:
Kristen Bell And Dax Shepard Are Boycotting Magazines Over Paparazzi Baby Pics

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today