Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Is It Time For The City To Rethink The Way It Gives Parking Tickets?

tickets.jpg
The kindness of strangers (Photo by Mary Lindsay via the LAist Featured Photos pool)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

By Diego Rentería

No one likes parking tickets, but over the last few years there have been serious complaints about the steadily increasing fines and the private company that handles the tickets for Los Angeles.

Now the contract for the private company that runs the Parking Violations Bureau is up for review—and just in time for the mayor's race. This is leading some folks to wonder whether now is the time to rethink the city's approach to parking tickets, which critics contend balances the city's budget on the backs of mostly lower-income residents and renters.

Los Angeles has boosted parking fines consistently over the last seven years. Just last year, street sweeping citations increased $5 to $73. Mayor Villaraigosa even suggested increasing the street sweeping citation to $78 as a way to further cover the city’s budget deficit.

Critics take issue with the way Xerox collects those fines. Some residents argue that Xerox protects revenue from parking violations by holding up appeals and other tactics. Jeff Galter, of Atwater Village, filed a class-action suit last month claiming Xerox does not seriously consider appeals of parking citations and responds with form letters rejecting those appeals. To add insult to injury, appeals to the DOT often result in Xerox charging late fees. (The editor of Hidden LA shared her own nightmarish tale of fighting a ticket.)

But staff in the Department of Transportation recently recommended a five-year contract extension for Xerox. (So far the city’s contract with Xerox State and Local Solutions cost Los Angeles $86 million over the last five years.)

The Los Angeles Times asked mayoral candidates at a forum last week whether now was the time for Los Angeles and Xerox to part ways. Eric Garcetti, Wendy Greuel, Jan Perry, and Emanuel Pleitez said they would closely look at Xerox’s contract before deciding to extend its contract. Only Kevin James came out and said he opposed a contract extension for Xerox.

Sponsored message

Related:
Are Street Sweeping Tickets a Tax on Renters?

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today