Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Is It Time For The City To Rethink The Way It Gives Parking Tickets?
The kindness of strangers (Photo by Mary Lindsay via the LAist Featured Photos pool)
()
By Diego Rentería
No one likes parking tickets, but over the last few years there have been serious complaints about the steadily increasing fines and the private company that handles the tickets for Los Angeles.
Now the contract for the private company that runs the Parking Violations Bureau is up for review—and just in time for the mayor's race. This is leading some folks to wonder whether now is the time to rethink the city's approach to parking tickets, which critics contend balances the city's budget on the backs of mostly lower-income residents and renters.
Los Angeles has boosted parking fines consistently over the last seven years. Just last year, street sweeping citations increased $5 to $73. Mayor Villaraigosa even suggested increasing the street sweeping citation to $78 as a way to further cover the city’s budget deficit.
Support for LAist comes from
Critics take issue with the way Xerox collects those fines. Some residents argue that Xerox protects revenue from parking violations by holding up appeals and other tactics. Jeff Galter, of Atwater Village, filed a class-action suit last month claiming Xerox does not seriously consider appeals of parking citations and responds with form letters rejecting those appeals. To add insult to injury, appeals to the DOT often result in Xerox charging late fees. (The editor of Hidden LA shared her own nightmarish tale of fighting a ticket.)
But staff in the Department of Transportation recently recommended a five-year contract extension for Xerox. (So far the city’s contract with Xerox State and Local Solutions cost Los Angeles $86 million over the last five years.)
The Los Angeles Times asked mayoral candidates at a forum last week whether now was the time for Los Angeles and Xerox to part ways. Eric Garcetti, Wendy Greuel, Jan Perry, and Emanuel Pleitez said they would closely look at Xerox’s contract before deciding to extend its contract. Only Kevin James came out and said he opposed a contract extension for Xerox.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist