Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Parks and Rec Throws Out Another Figure For Occupy L.A.'s Cost to City Hall Grounds

Occupy_LA_foreclosures.jpg
Photo by Lauren Lloyd

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

If there's one department that's worried about the Occupy L.A. encampment, it's the city's Recreation and Parks Department.

The department released its third estimate of how occupiers are wreaking havoc on the lawn, shrubbery and sprinkler-heads around City Hall. Two weeks into the movement, the department said damage to the lawn would cost the city $50,000. Occupiers responded by saying they would canvas for donations to fix the lawn. A few days later, the department's general manager Jon Kirk Mukri said the sod replacement and sprinkler damage could cost the city $400,000. (City councilman Dennis Zine was skeptical it could cost that much.)

Now Mukri is lowering his estimate and saying that the bill is $120,000, according to a memo obtained by City Maven. The memo blames occupiers for dry soil, nutrient-starved trees, broken sprinkler-heads and wear and tear to trees caused by protestors hooking their tents up to the trees for stability. The department is passing out fliers to occupiers so that they will not cause any more damage to the trees. It complains that the protestors are monopolizing the park and no one else is getting to enjoy it and warns that someone might get hurt while camping and sue the city.

"The persons now living on the grounds of the park have: 1) created several unsafe conditions; 2) monopolized the park grounds, thus limiting access for other park users; 3) greatly impacted (Recreation and Park’s) ability to properly maintain and irrigate the park; and, 4) caused damage to the park grounds including landscaped areas, hardscape areas, and trees,” Mukri wrote in the memo.

The memo also complains that because there are so many people camped out, the department couldn't get a proper estimate of how much it's going to cost the city in the end. We'll keep our eyes peeled for the next estimate. (Especially if out-of-town protestors looking for sunny skies show up this winter.)

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today