Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


Parks and Rec Throws Out Another Figure For Occupy L.A.'s Cost to City Hall Grounds

Photo by Lauren Lloyd
We need to hear from you.
Today during our spring member drive, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. The local news you read here every day is crafted for you, but right now, we need your help to keep it going. In these uncertain times, your support is even more important. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership. Thank you.

If there's one department that's worried about the Occupy L.A. encampment, it's the city's Recreation and Parks Department.

The department released its third estimate of how occupiers are wreaking havoc on the lawn, shrubbery and sprinkler-heads around City Hall. Two weeks into the movement, the department said damage to the lawn would cost the city $50,000. Occupiers responded by saying they would canvas for donations to fix the lawn. A few days later, the department's general manager Jon Kirk Mukri said the sod replacement and sprinkler damage could cost the city $400,000. (City councilman Dennis Zine was skeptical it could cost that much.)

Now Mukri is lowering his estimate and saying that the bill is $120,000, according to a memo obtained by City Maven. The memo blames occupiers for dry soil, nutrient-starved trees, broken sprinkler-heads and wear and tear to trees caused by protestors hooking their tents up to the trees for stability. The department is passing out fliers to occupiers so that they will not cause any more damage to the trees. It complains that the protestors are monopolizing the park and no one else is getting to enjoy it and warns that someone might get hurt while camping and sue the city.

"The persons now living on the grounds of the park have: 1) created several unsafe conditions; 2) monopolized the park grounds, thus limiting access for other park users; 3) greatly impacted (Recreation and Park’s) ability to properly maintain and irrigate the park; and, 4) caused damage to the park grounds including landscaped areas, hardscape areas, and trees,” Mukri wrote in the memo.

Support for LAist comes from

The memo also complains that because there are so many people camped out, the department couldn't get a proper estimate of how much it's going to cost the city in the end. We'll keep our eyes peeled for the next estimate. (Especially if out-of-town protestors looking for sunny skies show up this winter.)

Most Read