One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. Wants To Make Land Developers Pay For Parks
The 731 Units in the Hollywood Palladium Development would turn into about $3.6 million for parks. (courtesy of Stanley Saitowitz / Natoma Architects Inc)
The L.A. City Planning Commission approved new rules this past week that, if approved by the L.A. City Council, would increase the amount of money land developers have to contribute towards the construction and maintenance of local park space, according to KPCC.
L.A. is locked in the grips of a development boom. As high-rise residential towers replace parking lots in nearly every part of the city, the planning department noticed that nearly all of these projects were loopholed around contributing what are termed “Quimby Fees.”
Quimby Fees are fees levied on new houses and condos to pay for the construction of nearby parks. However, like so many other parts of the city’s antiquated planning language, L.A.’s current Quimby Fee legislation fails to levy charges upon multi-story residential development.
"The actual amount of funding was significantly one of the lowest levels in the state, and some categories were not covered by Quimbys," said David Ambroz, the Planning Commission president, to KPCC
The planning commission wants to change that, and is proposing that developers of high-rise residential buildings pay the city a $5,000 fee for each new apartment. For new houses built on subdivided land, that fee doubles to $10,000.
The proposed changes would also modify exactly what types of parks the funds may contribute too. Current legislation stipulates the money be spent on tiny neighborhood parks within one-half mile of a new unit. That radius is extended to two miles under the proposed changes.
Alternatively, the Quimby fees could also be used for medium sized “community” parks within five miles of the development, or “regional” parks within ten miles.
Sponsored message
The proposal now rests on L.A. City Council for approval.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
