Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Lots Of People Are Unhappy With Metro's $120 Billion Transportation Plan

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

Unsurprisingly, Metro's $120 billion plan to fix L.A. County's transportation troubles doesn’t suit everyone. Thursday morning's public comment session at the Metro Board meeting underscored that fact.

A laundry list of elected officials and community organizers pled their cases to the all-powerful Metro Board on Thursday, arguing that some of the earmarked projects be sped up, some be eliminated, and some unfunded opportunities be added to the plan.

The challenge Metro faces is, shall we say, epic. Building single a cohesive transportation plan for the nation's most populous county—one with more people than all but seven whole American states—is an exercise in compromise.

Critique comes from all sides. Notably, a large coalition of elected leaders from cities in Southeast L.A. County said they will vote against the plan unless it speeds up and augments several projects throughout the Gateway Cities region, like the proposed Eco-Rapid Line running from downtown Los Angeles to Artesia.

Support for LAist comes from

Southeast L.A. County is home to some most transit dependent communities in all of Southern California, yet, perhaps more so than anywhere else in the region, it lacks the infrastructure and development that would ensure people can have timely, car-free, commutes. Though the Gateway Cities are slated for some projects, many of these aren't due for completion until 2050 or later.

"There are 88 cities in Los Angeles County, not just one," said County Supervisor Don Knabe, who represents the South Bay and Southeast L.A. County, in a statement. "Taxpayers across the County will be asked to pay an additional half-cent sales tax and in return, they should all see benefits. Promises were made to taxpayers eight years ago... now, some of those commitments are being pushed down the road."

At the same time, proponents of active-transit, like walking and biking, say the plan falls short of the county's need to invest in adequate pedestrian and cycling infrastructure.

"So many of the trips to get to the buses or the rail are biking and walking so the investment has to be there," Tamika Butler, the director of L.A. County Bike Coalition, said to KPCC. "It would be a missed opportunity to spend billions making it easier to drive across the county when so many of our residents can't even walk safely to the bus stop or bike to the train station."

Butler has a point. While Metro's plan proposes big spending on rail and roads, critics like Butler point out that it earmarks a less-than-ideal amount of money improving the infrastructure people will use to get to their improved transit. Swaths of Los Angeles County don't even have sidewalks, much less adequate cycling infrastructure.

And, of course, criticism of a plan to fix L.A. County transportation wouldn't be complete without those who say the government needs to spend more money on roads.

Metro's plan includes several proposed road projects, including a widening of the 710 freeway, the 405 freeway south of LAX, and the establishment of a High Desert Transportation Corridor between Palmdale and Victorville. Like projects in Southeast L.A. County, many of these proposed fixes are put off for decades.

Support for LAist comes from

James Ledford, the mayor of Palmdale, explained to L.A. Weekly, how "the system is certainly stacked against (small) cities. Road maintenance is a real issue for cities, and I don't see any help for that." Ledford continued, however, that"the downtown interests are certainly being taken care of."

The "downtown interests" Ledford mention refers to the disproportionate amount of influence the City of Los Angeles holds over county politics. As such, the City of Los Angeles will benefit perhaps more than any other city in the region from the proposed $120 billion spending plan. This sort of makes sense given L.A. is the largest and often most-dense city in the County. But it's important to consider that more than half of L.A. County residents live outside L.A. City limits. Where Los Angeles City is is home to 3.9 million people, it's located in a county that's home to 10 million.

Those living outside Los Angeles City worry they will be unfairly taxed to pay for transit projects they will not benefit from.

While Mayor Garcetti would have ordinarily been present to hear the concerns of other elected officials representing millions of SoCal residents at Thursday morning's Metro Board, he was instead schmoozing with Hillary Clinton at a campaign fundraiser on USC's campus.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist