Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Wages. Contracts. Housing. Many Questions Remain After LA28 Releases Olympic Deal With City

Now that the deal between the city of Los Angeles and the local Olympic and Paralympic Games organizer is public, local players bracing for the games — for better or worse — are weighing in.
A large coalition of businesses say they welcome a shot at doing business with LA28, the private nonprofit that is staging the 2028 games. Meanwhile, the union representing thousands of hospitality workers is pushing back with demands for more transparency, as well as higher wages and housing protections.
The Nolympics coalition, true to its name, argues that the L.A. Games will cost residents far more than they gain and that the financial protections for the city's taxpayers fall short.
The Olympic and Paralympic Games represent a gigantic economic engine to drive growth in tourism and other industries for the next seven years. LA28 has a $6.9 billion budget and is expected to grow its own workforce from about 100 people to about 6,000 by 2027. At the same time, it promises to pay L.A. and other local jurisdictions to cover the added expenses of public safety, trash, traffic and other things the games will affect.
Hospitality Workers
Already, hospitality union officials are raising concerns about the types of jobs that will be created. The LA28 program to hire and train local workers "would do very little to ensure the quality of the jobs that will be required to carry out the Games," said Kurt Petersen, co-president of Unite Here Local 11. He also said the current plans lack concrete commitments to workforce diversity.
Petersen proposed LA28 commit to paying a minimum wage of $28 per hour and allocate a significant portion of jobs for Black workers.
"Why don't we say that Black workers should have a third of those jobs or a fourth of those jobs or half of those jobs [because they are] workers who have been historically excluded from hotel jobs in particular," Petersen said.
The hospitality union also objected to the lack of language in the draft that would protect local residents from rising housing costs and the possibility of being displaced from their homes.
City spokesman Alex Comisar said existing protections for affordable housing would remain in effect during the runup to the games. That includes rent control and ordinances covering short-term rentals.
Unite Here Local 11 sued the city in mid-October to force disclosure of the contract draft, complaining that it was produced without sufficient public input.
It was finally released Nov. 17 with a prospective approval vote coming by Dec. 8. In its response to the draft, the union called on the city council to delay any approval vote until the contract could be subjected to "meaningful input from community groups and working people."
Nolympics Coalition
The Nolympics coalition of progressive local groups said the contract proposal for the Games does not reduce what it considers to be an unacceptable amount of risk to the city's finances and residents.
"For LA84, the City of LA established hard, inflexible barriers to protect the city’s finances, removing the City as the guarantor of last resort," the group said in a statement. "For 2028, Angelenos remain the guarantor of last resort. The current city government has fundamentally failed to do that bare minimum to protect Angelenos."
In particular, the $270 million contingency against cost overruns of LA28's $6.9 billion budget is insufficient, the group said.
Under the contract proposal, LA28 pledges to set aside $270 million in a contingency fund to cover cost overruns; however, that represents a portion of the organization's overall contingency fund of $615 million, an LA28 spokeswoman said.
The Nolympics group questions whether LA28 has or can secure sufficient insurance to prevent a budget shortfall, and it criticized the city and LA28 for a lack of transparency in drafting the contract.
"This is how every step of the Olympic decision making process has transpired: behind closed doors, with vague promises, and taking huge risks at the expense of the most vulnerable all in the name of a two-week party," Nolympics said.
The group opposes the conversion of apartment buildings into hotels, and the conversion of houses into short-term rentals because both reduce the stock of affordable rental housing.
LA28 Chairman Casey Wasserman said part of his organization's job is to locate hundreds of thousands of local hotel rooms, work that he described as nearly complete.
The Olympic group is not responsible for solving all the city’s homeless and housing problems, he said.
“We're not responsible for controlling the housing market in Los Angeles for private rentals or what private landlords want to do at their facilities,” Wasserman said.
Local Businesses
Putting on any Olympic games requires resources beyond the city and organizing group. The contract between Los Angeles and LA28 calls for small businesses, including those owned by members of underrepresented groups, to benefit from the influx of dollars to stage the games.
Contracts for those businesses could be coming from LA28 as well as from the city. How those will be evaluated and awarded is also raising concerns. For many years the city's contracting processes had been splintered into several pieces.
A new streamlined bidding and procurement process called Compete4LA is being installed in advance of the games; it's endorsed by a coalition of business groups and associations of Black, Latino and Asian-owned firms.
"The new regional marketplace and procurement program — both the new state-of-the-art online platform and the outreach effort to engage and onboard local diverse small business — are essential to achieving regional economic equity for Los Angeles and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games," the letter co-signed by the groups said.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.