Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA Explores Possible Tour Bus Ban Near Hollywood Sign

Tourists who wish to glimpse the Hollywood sign from a bus in the hills may not be able to do so eventually.
On Wednesday, the L.A. City Council approved a motion 11-0 that directs the city’s Department of Transportation to look into a possible ban on tour buses in neighborhoods that surround the iconic sign, one of L.A.’s biggest attractions.
According to the motion, introduced by Councilmember Nithya Raman, the streets surrounding the Hollywood sign are not safe or adequate for bus traffic.
A longstanding complaint from neighbors
“The narrow, winding streets of these neighborhoods are not suitable for large vehicles, and over the years residents have cited persistent moving violations and other infractions by Tour Bus operators,” the motion reads.
Raman represents Council District 4, which includes the Hollywood sign area.
In the motion Raman also notes tour buses are violating weight limits on hillside streets and that the restrictions “could be enforced more consistently.”
LAist has reached out to some Hollywood tour bus companies, which haven’t responded so far.
The area that would be affected by the possible ban is bound by Barham Boulevard, the ridgeline of the Santa Monica Mountains, Western Canyon Road, Franklin Avenue and the 101 Freeway.
Communities affected would include Hollywood Knolls, Hollywood Dell, Lake Hollywood, Hollywoodland, Beachwood Canyon and the Oaks.
'Blind curves and hairpin turns'

Sarajane Schwartz, a 45-year resident of the historic Hollywoodland neighborhood, submitted a written comment in support of a tour bus ban.
“We are one of the most fragile and threatened neighborhoods in all of Los Angeles,” Schwartz wrote. “We have extremely limited egress and ingress and our main artery dead ends at both ends. ALL of our winding narrow streets — many dead-ending — with blind curves and hairpin turns are substandard. EVERY parked car prevents two-way traffic. Our streets just barely handle the needs of residents.”
The city’s transportation department has 120 days to report back with recommendations.
Wednesday’s motion also directs the LAPD, along with the transportation department, to report back within 30 days on weight restrictions in Council District 4 and what resources are needed to enforce them in the Hollywood Hills area.
Four council members were absent from Wednesday’s vote.
Ideas to ease tourist traffic
Last week the council approved two related motions from Raman: One that seeks to install permanent fencing at the end of Mulholland Highway to dissuade Hollywood sign viewers and reduce traffic, and another calling for a roundabout on Mulholland and other improvements to ease congestion.
The fencing in the first motion would replace a temporary fence put up years ago. The Bureau of Engineering is to report back on those motions, both of which Raman explained in a statement on her website.
“One of the City’s most well-known landmarks — really the very symbol of Los Angeles itself — the Hollywood Sign, is also one of our most most visited destinations not just in Council District 4 but in all of Los Angeles,” Raman’s statement read.
She continued: “Despite relying on the Hollywood Sign to attract tourists to the City, we have not invested in sufficient infrastructure in the hills to enhance visitors’ experience and ensure the safety of neighboring residents.”
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.