Your gift is matched today!

Double your donation's impact on our newsroom today during our June member drive.
1,741 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Militarized police? An FAQ on the Pentagon's surplus program

A rendering by the San Diego Unified school district of what an MRAP might look like after its tan military color is painted over.

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

The U.S. Department of Defense released fine-grain data in November on surplus military equipment it gave to local law enforcement agencies. The data can get complicated.

So here's a guide to understanding the acronyms contained in the data — and its limitations.

Q: What do the acronyms related to the 1033 program mean?

A: Here are the ones you'll see the most:

  • DLA: the Defense Logistics Agency, the arm of the Department of Defense that manages the 1033 program
  • MRAP: a Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle
  • LEA: a law enforcement agency, such as a local police department
  • NSN: the National Stock Number, a 13-digit code used by the military to identify equipment

Q: Has the amount of military equipment acquired by local law enforcement agencies through the 1033 program increased over time? Has the type of equipment they receive changed?

A: The data released by the Defense Logistics Agency on Nov. 21 is a snapshot, not a historical record.

The agency tracks "non-controlled" items for one year, and the item is then removed from active inventory.

Sponsored message

It tracks "controlled" items — things like rifles and combat vehicles, but also other equipment that you wouldn't think of as tactical (see next question) — that are currently at law enforcement agencies. Since the information is partial, we can't make historical comparisons.

For example, the data doesn't allow us to say whether the amount equipment acquired by an agency has increased over time.  We can only say when the equipment that is currently at an agency arrived there.

 Law enforcement agencies must track controlled property for as long as it's in their possession.

Q: Controlled, non-controlled: what do those terms mean? Does controlled mean the same thing as weapons?

A: Those are two different classifications for the 1033 equipment — but they're fuzzy. 

You can find the definition of controlled property in the California certification package for the 1033 program.

 Tonya Johnson, of the Defense Logistics Agency said aircraft, "tactical vehicles" and robots are examples of controlled items that the agency considers tactical. But that doesn't mean every "controlled" item is a tank or rifle.

Sponsored message

"You cannot make that distinction because the tactical equipment definition can be subjective," she said.

Q: What's a demilitarization code?

A: You can go down that rabbit hole here and in these three volumes of the Defense Demilitarization Manual.

Q: Are the 1033 items brand new?

A: Not usually. According to a fact sheet provided to Congress on the 1033 program by Defense Logistics Agency director Mark Harnitchek — available in this ACLU report — about 36 percent of equipment is new. About 64 percent — nearly two-thirds — is used.

Q: Does the equipment arrive in good condition?

A: It varies. When the Glendora, Calif. Police Department received two Peacekeeper-style armored vehicles in 1997, the department ended up using one in dozens of SWAT operations and the other for parts.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today