Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Should Elon Musk's Westside tunnel get to skip environmental review?

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Listen 0:58
Should Elon Musk's Westside tunnel get to skip environmental review?

Despite concerns from the region's big transit agency, Elon Musk's Boring Company got an important nod from Los Angeles lawmakers in its quest to bypass environmental studies and build a tunnel under a busy Westside thoroughfare.

On Wednesday, the city council's Public Works Committee unanimously approved the project and exempted it from state environmental reviews.  The plan still needs to go before the full city council for final approval. 

The committee voted after a city engineer told members that an environmental study for a similar tunnel dug by the Boring Company in Hawthorne would be applicable to the plan to build a tunnel under Sepulveda Boulevard.

Musk wants to construct a network of tunnels to move people and vehicles underground on emissions-free vehicles. To accomplish that, he wants to test the concept with the Sepulveda tunnel.

One end of the 14-foot diameter tunnel would start near Pico and Sepulveda (an intersection made famous in song by Felix Figueroa and his Orchestra).  The other end would terminate near Sepulveda and Washington Boulevard in Culver City.

But officials with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority are worried Musk's plans could interfere with their own plans to put a subway under Sepulveda Boulevard.

Sponsored message

On Wednesday, Phillip Washington, CEO of Metro, wrote the Public Works Committee stating that any tunnel by the Boring Company must be submitted to Metro for approval before digging could begin. The recently-approved Measure M transit sales tax provides funding for Metro's planned subway project under the Sepulveda Pass.

Washington said Metro had oversight authority for all mass transit projects in the county under the state Public Utilities Code. 

City Councilman Bob Blumenthal said the experimental tunnel would not be permitted to carry any passengers, so it wasn't a mass transit project. Still, he agreed with Washington and his motion required the tunnel to meet Metro approval before construction can start. His motion approving the tunnel also required the Boring Company to indemnify the city against any legal costs and costs that might occur if the project is not completed.

The Boring Company already has one tunnel in Hawthorne, and its proposed future network could extend to many parts of the region including the South Bay, Westside and San Fernando Valley, according to a motion submitted by 5th District Councilman Paul Koretz.

The tunnel project has had at least some environmental review. The city's Bureau of Engineering was relying on a 1,500-page report prepared by The Boring Company for the tunnel it dug in Hawthorne.

During the public hearing Wednesday, Sherman Oaks consultant Robert Rieth said granting the Boring Company an exemption from state environmental reviews gave the company an unfair business advantage over other private or public projects.

The company says its tunnels would be similar to those built for subway trains by Metro. It's put forward a few different visions for what would run in the tunnels. The latest has zero-emission vehicles and small passenger buses. Representatives of the Boring Company at the committee meeting declined to make a comment or give their names to a reporter.

Sponsored message

On Wednesday, officials with the city of Culver City said they had not given any approval to the Boring Company’s proposed tunnel, nor had the company submitted any applications for permits or approvals.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today