Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LAPD report: no physical evidence that suspect ambushed 2 officers
A report by Los Angeles Police Department's Inspector General says crime scene investigators could not find physical evidence to support two LAPD officers' claim that they were ambushed by a gunman in front of the Wilshire station last year. The story was first reported by the Los Angeles Times.
According to the report by Inspector General Alex Bustamante, there are doubts about whether a suspected shooter actually fired a weapon last year on June 25 at two LAPD officers returning to the police station's gated parking lot on Venice Boulevard in Mid-City.
“A thorough examination of the officers’ vehicle and the surrounding area revealed there were no impacts or other physical evidence to support that the subject fired a weapon,” the report from the L.A. Office of Inspector General states.
Detective Humberto Tovar and police officer Bernard Romero told investigators they were returning from an assignment around 4:30 a.m. when they saw a man dressed in black clothing walking "briskly" as if he were jogging or "walking with a purpose," according to the report.
Tovar, riding in the police car’s passenger seat, warned Romero that it seemed like the man “appeared to be ‘amped up,’” the report states. Tovar told investigators he saw the man “make a two-hand motion as if he was assuming a shooting stance.”
Tovar didn’t see a weapon in the man’s hands as the suspect walked behind their car, but said he saw a flash and heard glass breaking, based on statements in the report. Believing the suspect was firing at them, he shot two rounds from inside the police car out the rear window. That was the beginning of the supposed gun battle.
The report concluded the 19-year veteran detective fired 23 rounds. Officer Romero fired five-to-10 rounds, four of which were unintentional and hit parts of the car's interior.
A security video camera from a building approximately 290 feet across the street from the police station captured parts of what happened. It shows the suspect running and “holding an unidentified object in his right hand,” according to the report.
Investigators found no evidence that would indicate the suspect was wounded by the officers’ gunfire.
Romero, who was driving, had a two-inch cut to the back of his head, but a doctor didn’t describe it as a gunshot wound.
After reviewing the investigation into the shooting, L.A. Police Commissioners voted 3 to 1 on Tuesday that the two officers' decisions to open fire on the suspect was “objectively reasonable and in policy” because they believed their lives were in danger based on the man’s actions.
However, the commission criticized Tovar’s tactics for not carrying appropriate equipment. And it declared Romero’s four unintentional gunshots to be “negligent.”
LAPD chief Charlie Beck is responsible for administering any punishment to the two officers. A spokesman for Beck gave The Times a statement that read: "The actions of the suspect, the witnesses' statements and the officers' observations support the officers' belief that they were being fired upon."
The police shooting on June 25 shut down an entire neighborhood, limiting residents’ access for about 12 hours as police and L.A. County Sheriff’s teams searched for the suspected gunman.
No one was ever arrested for the incident.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.