Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA approves affordable housing rules, Santa Monica rejects anti-development measure
A row of five-story housing developments lines Fifth Street between Broadway and Santa Monica Boulevard. Architect Mario Fonda-Bonardi says buildings that are more than four stories tall can separate residents from the street.
(
Maya Sugarman/KPCC
)
Los Angeles voted to pass new regulations on housing developers in the city, while Santa Monica residents rejected an initiative that would have limited growth in the city.
Under L.A. city measure JJJ, developers who want to build projects that require exemptions from the city must also provide some affordable housing in those buildings. The developers must also make an effort to hire local, union workers. Because the city's zoning code is out of date, many new housing projects require exemptions to get planning approval.
JJJ received 64 percent of the vote, with its main backer saying it's a victory for people who think they're being priced out of Los Angeles.
"Residents are crying out for homes that they can actually afford and jobs that they can rely on," said Rusty Hicks, executive secretary-treasurer of the L.A. County Federation of Labor.
Support for LAist comes from
"If developers are going to be developing in our city then they need to be giving something back to the people," said Alexandra Suh from the Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance, another organization that backed the measure.
But local developers fought the initiative. L.A. builder Mott Smith said JJJ's positive effects will be limited in the long run, and wont affect a large number of projects.
"It's not going to make housing more affordable, it's not going to create more jobs for union members," Smith said.
Some housing experts warned that it could also have the adverse effect of making builders shy away from breaking ground in Los Angeles altogether, and that lack of building would contribute to L.A.'s housing shortage.
"We'll see some developers who are not going to want to deal with the extra difficulty and the potentially lower (profit) margins," said USC housing expert Raphael Bostic.
Meanwhile in Santa Monica, residents rejected a measure that called for a citywide vote on each development project that is larger than three stories high. That measure, called LV, failed with 56 percent of residents voting no.
"Measure LV would've limited our ability to meet Santa Monica's housing needs," said city councilman Kevin McKeown, who said he was pleased the measure failed because it would've slowed down efforts to build denser developments in the area.
Support for LAist comes from
In March, Los Angeles residents will see one more development measure on the ballot. Dubbed the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative, it calls for a two-year ban on so-called "mega-developments" in Los Angeles.
Supporters of JJJ are opposed to that measure, because it would make JJJ void for a two year period, and halt new developments that require city exemptions.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist