With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Can California's high-speed rail system sustain itself?
File: A high-speed rail rendering.
(
Courtesy California High Speed Rail Authority
)
A map showing the proposed high-speed rail system's path.
(
California Legislative Analyst's Office
)
The California state Legislature's non-partisan budget analyst released a report Thursday outlining the business plan for the state's proposed high-speed rail system.
The review cites two potential problems with the project's funding now that the plan has shifted to begin construction in Northern California rather than in the south.
A map showing the proposed high-speed rail system's path.
(
California Legislative Analyst's Office
)
The new business plan assumes the rail line's first part would largely be funded by the cap-and-trade program for carbon emissions, but that program has yet to be extended beyond 2020.
Support for LAist comes from
"While the administration indicates it plans to continue the cap-and-trade program beyond 2020, current law does not appear to authorize the program’s continuation," the report states.
Given that, the Legislature will have to decide whether the likely ridership for this part of the system alone — running between San Jose and Bakersfield — would be enough to sustain itself, even if the other sections of the system never get built.
The High Speed Rail Authority's plan changed course in February, in part because officials encountered resistance from some communities along the planned route between Burbank and Palmdale.
Read the full report below:
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
Best of LAist