Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
As families return to Montecito homes, disease threat from mud persists

Montecito residents who had been evacuated from neighborhoods overrun by mud Jan. 9 were cleared to return home this week. But families returning to intact houses might still have to deal with a layer of mud in their yards, and unhealthy substances the mud picked up in its path.
The mud carried sewage from septic tanks, and petrochemicals like gasoline stored in flooded garages. Santa Barbara County Public Health officials urged residents to take safeguards against being contaminated by mud. Among the warnings are to avoid skin-to-mud contact and to not breathe dust from the drying mud.
Ojai lawyer Trevor Quirk has been volunteering to help Montecito residents dig out, and he’s taking care not to touch the mud, using "Gloves masks, rain boots, sanitizing very well, taking precautions," he said.
The public health department also issued extensive warnings to people coming into contact with the mud, from contractors digging out yards to families whose homes were intact but dealing with a layer of the muck in their yards.
"We know that there's high bacteria levels and bacteria, and I’m more concerned about bacteria than anything else, quite honestly," said Public Health Department Deputy Director Susan Klein-Rothschild. "So I would recommend kids not play it."
Santa Barbara County hired an outside lab to test for potentially harmful substances in the mud. Test results released Jan. 18 found high levels of fecal bacteria that likely came from ruptured septic systems and pipes. The bacteria, including harmful E. coli bacteria were detected in all ten mud areas sampled. The tests also found gasoline, diesel or motor oil in nine of the ten samples.
The amounts of heavy metals like arsenic, barium, chromium, copper and lead in the soil were low enough that the testing results said they were likely a background level present in the soil, and not high enough for the mud to be treated as a hazardous material.
The test did not detect asbestos or PCBs, a probable carcinogen.
Swimming at many beaches was banned soon after the Jan. 9 mudflow due to high bacteria counts in the ocean water, with some beaches beginning to reopen as the bacteria levels return to normal. Santa Barbara County officials warned the public against eating raw seafood or shellfish that could have absorbed bacteria from the mud. Tests taken between January 11 and 20 showed elevated levels of bacteria. New tests are due out this week.
The Santa Barbara Public Health Department also put out a notice debunking a rumor that breathing in the dried dust from mud being deposited in landfills and on beaches could transmit the Hepatitis C virus.
Hepatitis C is a virus spread by contact with blood, said Dr. Charity Dean, Santa Barbara County’s Public Health Officer, so it could not be contracted by breathing dust from the drying mud.
Hepatitis A is spread through contact with fecal matter, so it is possible that people touching sewage-tainted mud could be at risk to get the virus. However, no cases of Hepatitis A have been reported, said Klein-Rothschild. A vaccination is available, but it takes two weeks to become effective.
“The likelihood for evidence of other forms of Hepatitis A or B and its transmission within the runoff is extremely slight,” she said.
Still, the health department recommended that people cleaning mud and debris get a tetanus booster shot if it’s been ten years since their last vaccination.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.