Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Judge At Rapist's Sentencing: 'If Someone Doesn't Want To Have Sexual intercourse, The Body Shuts Down'

shutterstock_gavel_640.jpg
Photo by Kuzma via Shutterstock

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

A judge in Orange County has been admonished—if, belatedly—for making some outrageous comments during a rapist's sentencing that calls to mind the comment that ended up sinking the senate candidacy of Republican Todd Akin.

At the sentencing hearing for a man convicted of rape in 2008, Superior Court Judge Derek Johnson said that he considered the rape "technical," according to City News Service. He said:

"I'm not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something—if someone doesn't want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage is inflicted, and we heard nothing about that in this case. That tells me that the victim in this case, although she wasn't necessarily willing, she didn't put up a fight. And to treat this case like the rape cases that we all hear about is an insult to victims of rape. I think it's an insult. I think it trivializes a rape."

The judge gave the speech as a way to explain why he wanted to sentence the rapist to 6 years in prison, instead of the 16 that the prosecutor requested.So what was this "technical rape"? Metin Gurel was convicted of rape, forcible oral copulation, domestic battery, stalking and making threats against his live-in girlfriend. On the day of the rape, Gurel threatened to mutiliate the victim's face and vagina with a heated screwdriver, the Los Angeles Times reports.

The OC Weekly had more horrifying details about the case from a story back in 2008:


According to court and police records, Gurel secretly placed a GPS device on a girlfriend’s car in late 2007, added spyware on her home computer, stole a key to her gated apartment complex, made a bomb threat against her and faxed a semi-nude picture of her to her office. After they broke up, he stalked her, phoned incessantly and, in a fit of jealousy, punctured one of her car tires while she was on a date at a South Coast Plaza-area restaurant. Despite these warning signs, this lady agreed to visit Gurel at his apartment in hopes of convincing him to move on. He had other ideas. When she arrived, he shattered her cell phone with an illegally possessed baton, forbade her from leaving, heated a screwdriver on the and waved it around her body—threatening to maim her face and vagina so that, he stated, no other man would want to date her. He poured a glass of scotch and Coke, grabbed a lighter, and threatened to douse her with the cocktail and ignite her.

After ordering her to strip, Gurel forced her to perform fellatio, raped her repeatedly and ejaculated in her mouth. Later, when he got hungry, he told her to make him breakfast. She eventually escaped. Explaining his post-rape attitude to police, Gurel noted that in his native country’s culture, men control women—even “scare” them into obedience.


The Weekly called out the judge for his comments back when the case was going on, but it apparently took a while for the San Francisco-based Commission on Judicial Performance to get the memo. They said they only heard about the comments in May 2012, the Times reported.The commission sent out a release publicly admonishing the judge:
"In the commission's view, the judge's remarks reflected outdated, biased and insensitive views about sexual assault victims who do not `put up a fight.' Such comments cannot help but diminish public confidence and trust in the impartiality of the judiciary."
Sponsored message

Johnson apologized for the comments, but it will not affect his job (for now). It's not clear whether this would (or could) affect the case in question.While we're on the topic of technicalities, it's worth pointing out that Johnson is the same judge who legitimized "Seinfeld's" pseudo-holiday "Festivus" in a court order a few years ago. An inmate who wanted to be served kosher meals because they were healthier claimed in court that he had dietary restrictions because of his religion "Festivus" and the judge was A-okay with that.

UPDATE: If you are an Orange County resident hoping to get the chance to vote out a judge like Johnson out for his conduct, you should know that it appears you've already missed one chance since Johnson made those comments in 2008. We checked in with an Orange County Superior Court spokeswoman, who told us that Judge Derek Johnson's six-year term ends on January 4, 2015. If we count backwards, we figure that Johnson was up for reelection in November 2008 just a week after the OC Weekly story detailing his comments hit the stands.

The story notes that in another domestic violence case where a man was accused of punching, kicking, strangling and pointing a loaded handgun at a girlfriend, Johnson called the victim "a dullard" in court. The OC Weekly says that Johnson was actually a former sex-crimes prosecutor.

The Los Angeles Times reports that Johnson has been a judge since 2000.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today