This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Immediate Future of Plastic Bag Ban in Santa Monica Unclear
Photo by Newtown graffiti via Flickr
Photo by Newtown graffiti via Flickr
The city of Santa Monica has been moving towards a ban of single-use plastic bags, however the next steps in the process are a little less clear right now, thanks to the recent state-wide election, and in the wake of a bag ban approved this week for L.A. County, according to the Santa Monica Daily Press.City Hall is now rethinking their ban as proposed, which would prohibit Santa Monica's stores from providing customers with single-use plastic bags, and mandated they charge a minimum 20 cent per-bag surcharge for paper bags. The issue with that plan, however, is that California voters passed Prop 26, which affects how taxes are levied on industry. The amount Santa Monica would recoup from the paper bag surcharge "would be considered a tax on industry and couldn't be enacted without a two-thirds vote from the public under Prop. 26."
Officials intend to re-draft the ban proposal, and have it come to Council for a vote. They are looking to revise the economic aspect of the ban, namely the surcharge, to match the ban as passed by the L.A. County Board of Supervisors, wherein the surcharge on paper bags does not go to any government agency. Santa Monica's vote could take place in January.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
