This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
How Much Do L.A. County Cities Spend on Fighting Legal Battles?
Are our local cities paying the price for legal troubles? A data set compiled and released by the L.A. Times ranks spending on city attorneys in the 88 cities in Los Angeles County.
"Attorneys’ fees consume less than 1% of the 2010 budgets in nearly half the county’s cities, an average of about $25 per resident," notes the Times, adding: "A handful of cities spend three to four times that much."
The Times' data reflects city spending from 2005 through 2010, "expressed as a percentage of the city’s operating and redevelopment budgets and per capita."
Perhaps not surprisingly, the City of Los Angeles is the biggest, and the biggest spender when it comes to what we pour from civic coffers into the City Attorney's office: Nearly $133M a year. (Long Beach comes in second in annual City Attorney costs at $11.5M.) However, in the City of L.A., that's a per capita amount of just $29, which puts us close to the bottom of the spectrum.
RANKED BY ANNUAL AMOUNT:
In a total reverse of what we find in Los Angeles, Vernon has had a few spendy years. Annual City Attorney costs come in at $10,625,650, in third place behind Long Beach, but has the lowest population in the county, at a mere 114. (Yeah, seriously, 114). Okay, don't worry about your math whiz skills, the Times did the division: That's a whopping $98,234 per capita annually. Egads.
RANKED BY PER CAPITA:
How does City Attorney spending get so jacked up? The Times says, clearly, it's thanks to corruption. And that corruption is a fiscal gift that keeps on taking: "In some cases, the legal bills continue years after officials accused of corruption have been ousted or jailed, leaving the affected cities struggling beneath a heavy burden."
It's not really that the cities have to spend money to defend accused city employees; those folks have to get their own lawyers. Instead, the costs come from cities having to head to court to battle cases stemming from the corruption.
Another thing to consider when looking at the data is how much of the city budget pie does the city attorney swallow up. When it comes to Vernon, for example, they rank fifth, since those aforementioned big costs take up 3.8% of the annual city budget. The four cities whose budgets yield more to city attorney costs are Signal Hill, Hawthorne, Bradbury, and Hermosa Beach.
RANKED BY PERCENT OF BUDGET:
Here's something to think about, if you're a City of L.A. resident: While we spent the most in the County on annual city attorney costs, we're only spending 1.0% of our city budget to do so.