Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


Glendale to Intensify Fight Against Proposed 710 Freeway Tunnel

Before you
Dear reader, we're asking you to help us keep local news available for all. Your tax-deductible financial support keeps our stories free to read, instead of hidden behind paywalls. We believe when reliable local reporting is widely available, the entire community benefits. Thank you for investing in your neighborhood.

A proposal to tunnel underneath a handful of cities to connect the 710 and 210 freeways has been a controversy for decades. And it's not over yet.

City of Glendale officials this week agreed to devote more resources to fighting the project, which currently has studied five different tunnel routes that could affect Alhambra, Glendale, La Cañada-Flintridge, Los Angeles, Monterey Park, San Marino, South Pasadena or Pasadena.

Joining La Canada and South Pasadena, Glendale, which only formally opposed the project last year, will now use funds to create an action plan, according to the Glendale News-Press. The action could involved legal challenges.

“I hear a clear consensus on wanting to take an active position against the tunnel and being more engaged in this,” said City Manager Jim Starbird, who also noted the costs associated could amount to the hundreds of thousands.

Support for LAist comes from

One councilman opposed the move. “The analysis hasn’t been made. Environmental documents haven’t been done,” said Dave Weaver. “We don’t know which route it will go. Nothing has been done.”