Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Food

Suit to Overturn Foie Gras Ban Filed in Los Angeles

foiegraslocomoco.jpg
Photo by djjewelz via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Hot's Restaurant Group has banded together with Hudson Valley Foie Gras and Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Québec, the nonprofit group in Canada that represents farmers and distributors to file suit agains the State of California for the unconstitutionality of the foie gras ban that went into effect on July 1. Let freedom reign indeed.

The lawsuit, which was brought to the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on Monday, argues that it's unclear what constitutes force feeding under the law. Says the suit:

"The statute defines 'force feeding' as using a process that causes a bird 'to consume more food than a typical bird of the same species would consume voluntarily. In practice, the vagueness of this purported standard makes it impossible for anyone to know at what point a particular bird has been fed 'more food' than the Bird Feeding Law allows."

The suit also hopes that the ban will be temporarily lifted while it is being debated.

"Michael Tenenbaum, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said he plans to ask the court for a preliminary injunction, which would freeze the law until it can be hashed out in court. He said the request would be made soon, but gave no further details," says the SF Chronicle.

Does this mean more indulgent foie gras dinners (and the protests that come along with them) are in our future?

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right