This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Expansion at Long Beach Airport Set to Take Flight
Plans to expand the Long Beach airport have cleared a long-standing hurdle, as a Superior Court judge ruled yesterday that "that the city did not violate state law when it approved an environmental report for the expansion."
There has been tremendous tension between the city and residents regarding the potential harm to air quality and noise in the area if the airport receives the addition of a new parking garage and an expanded terminal. The Long Beach school district filed a suit in 2006 and "argued that dozens of schools would be affected by noise and demanded the city pay for soundproofing at those sites."
Proponents of the plan claim they have everyone's interests in mind. Rae Gabelich, 8th District Councilmember, recently declared the need to have more "teeth" in the current proposal for expansion, and published her thoughts on the issue, stating that "the council wants to see a modernized and improved airport terminal that the city can be proud of, that addresses the needs of airport security and accommodates the passengers utilizing Long Beach Airport." She added, though, is that she would not endorse "a project that circumvents the environmental process. A project that triples the size of the airport to the detriment of our neighborhoods, and needlessly jeopardizing our city’s valued noise ordinance."
Friday's ruling makes way for the changes as-is. Currently the airport serves 1.2 million travelers annually, which could nearly quadruple in the coming years.
Photo by dykstranet via Flickr
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
