Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts and Entertainment

Oliver Stone's 'Snowden' Fails To Create Drama From The Whistleblower's Real Story

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

The most revealing moment in CITIZENFOUR, Laura Poitras' Oscar-winning documentary about her encounter with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, comes when Snowden helps journalist Glenn Greenwald fix a tech problem on his laptop. Snowden's calm, almost bemused voice is instantly recognizable to anyone interacting with the office IT guy. The moment comes off as so mundane one might not realize how crucial it is to Poitras' film—and how different Oliver Stone has envisioned him in Snowden. There was nothing particularly extraordinary or even heroic about Snowden's manner, only the action he took in revealing them.

Played by a twitchy Joseph Gordon-Levitt with a voice pitched from his gut, the Snowden of Stone's film aims to match the man's personal story with his actions. Stone paints him within a 21st Century spy story as a globe-trotting intelligence analyst and a daredevil who challenged the system. It deliberately mimics Stone's 1989 film Born On The Fourth of July, where Tom Cruise's All-American, patriotic Vietnam vet finally became disillusioned with his government and decided to protest against it. But Snowden's story is too broad, and Stone's filmmaking has tempered quite a bit since his heyday of JFK and Nixon. While Stone aims for great drama, he doesn't manage to transcend the mundane reality of both the intelligence community and those who empowered it.

Like any major production, the film mostly works as a parade for A-list Hollywood actors to step in for bit parts. Melissa Leo and Zachary Quinto fill in as Poitras and Greenwald; Timothy Olyphant slides shady glances as a CIA agent; Shailene Woodley puts on a game face to give some personality to Snowden's girlfriend Lindsay Mills; and (in two roles invented for the film) Rhys Ifans and Nicolas Cage take sides as yin-and-yang mentors for the budding hacker. But beyond Ifan's bottom-of-the-belly voiced diatribes, none of the actors really dig their teeth. The Southern drawls, outlandish screams and not-so-mild-mannered gestures that fuel Stone's best films are sorely missed. Even Gordon-Levitt's central performance, a collection of mild-mannered tics, feels sedated.

Many of these problems draw out of Stone's approach. After a series of tedious projects (Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, World Trade Center), 2012's Savages felt like somewhat of a return to form: a beergut B-movie beating a drum of both hokum and horror. Snowden instead aims for respectability, and in doing so looks anonymous. Beyond occasional security camera or GoPro shots evoking the surveillance state, the staging of actors feels downright lazy; dialogue sequences drone on with lazy shot-reverse shot editing that never engages the intrigue or drama. Even during Gordon-Levitt's expository monologues about the surveillance state, the quick, flashy editing and CGI-aided montages feel rather rote. These moments clearly evoke the old Stone, the rabble-rouser whose diatribes at least felt daring, but here they feel like addenda to Snowden's personal morality.

Support for LAist comes from

Stone continually paints Snowden as an extraordinary genius at his work and later a lone wolf, his inner conflict emerging through the nagging relationship with Lindsay who just cannot understand his inner demons. In short, his story reflects that of a singular Great Man, almost accomplishing the opposite of what Poitras set to do with her intimate CITIZENFOUR. While both Poitras and Stone argue Snowden is a patriot instead of a traitor, Stone tries to fit him into a tradition of Hollywood heroes, losing everything unique about the real man along the way. Snowden himself might not agree (he appears in a cameo at the end), but the film loses its subject's voice in service of drama.

Since Snowden does little to explicate the issues of security that its title character protested against, one might argue that the film's aims are inspirational. But because it feels so generic for an individual whose genius is beyond that of the common man, it falls into the same category of the equally droll Alan Turring biopic The Imitation Game—great men do great things while the rest can only helplessly look on. Near the end, Snowden's heroic walk into white light literally dissolves the image of his body, reminding us that his role here is simply a spectacle, a sight to gawk at instead of understand.

Snowden opens everywhere on Friday.

Peter Labuza is a freelance film critic, whose work has appeared in Variety, Sight & Sound, and The A.V. Club. Follow him on Twitter.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist