Support for LAist comes from
Made of L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts and Entertainment

Patty Jenkins Responds To James Cameron: He Doesn't 'Understand What Wonder Woman Stands For'

Director Patty Jenkins with actress Gal Gadot. (Getty)
Support your source for local news!
The local news you read here every day is crafted for you, but right now, we need your help to keep it going. In these uncertain times, your support is even more important. Today, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership. Thank you.

On Thursday, director James Cameron took a shot at Wonder Woman, this summer's blockbuster that has been celebrated for not only being a success, but for being a watershed moment in Hollywood with a female-led production. Cameron told The Guardian he didn't understand the "self-congratulatory back-patting" around its success.

"She’s an objectified icon, and it’s just male Hollywood doing the same old thing!" Cameron mansplained, adding: "I’m not saying I didn’t like the movie but, to me, it’s a step backwards. [The Terminator's] Sarah Connor was not a beauty icon. She was strong, she was troubled, she was a terrible mother, and she earned the respect of the audience through pure grit. And to me, [the benefit of characters like Sarah] is so obvious. I mean, half the audience is female!"

Director Patty Jenkins swung back on Twitter, correctly pointing out that a woman doesn't need to be damaged and troubled to be strong:

James Cameron’s inability to understand what Wonder Woman is, or stands for, to women all over the world is unsurprising as, though he is a great film-maker, he is not a woman. Strong women are great. His praise of my film Monster, and our portrayal of a strong yet damaged woman was so appreciated. But if women have to always be hard, tough and troubled to be strong, and we aren’t free to be multidimensional or celebrate an icon of women everywhere because she is attractive and loving, then we haven’t come very far have we. I believe women can and should be EVERYTHING, just like male lead characters should be. There is no right and wrong kind of powerful woman. And the massive female audience who made the film a hit it is, can surely choose and judge their own icons of progress.
Support for LAist comes from

Many others chimed in as well:

Most Read