Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Hollywood Writers Might Fire All Their Agents In A Week And A Half

The vote on whether TV and movie writers will be forced to fire their agents starts today. If writers approve a new Agency Code of Conduct and the agencies don't agree to it (which they've refused to do thus far), then the guild's 15,000 writers will be forced to fire their agents come April 7.
WGA leaders said they expect the code to be overwhelmingly approved -- this follows a number of meetings with members over the last couple months.
The Guild recently unveiled a plan to help writers move forward without agents, if needed. But it's an especially scary time for writers to be agentless. They're in the midst of TV staffing season -- and agents are the ones who would be helping them get jobs (and get paid well for said jobs).
The plan includes keeping a list of agencies that agree to sign onto the new Code of Conduct and launching online tools to help writers get jobs and employers find them. The writers' attorneys will be handling more of the heavy lifting when it comes to getting them good deals, though the guild is offering to help.
The reasons behind writers potentially firing their agents are complicated. We broke it down in depth with reps from the Writers Guild (representing writers) and the ATA (representing agents), but it boils down to this: writers are fighting to eliminate what they say are agency conflicts of interest, while agencies are fighting to defend some of their largest sources of income.
The Code of Conduct (the one being voted on by writers) includes provisions that would keep agencies from having an ownership interest in production companies -- meaning they couldn't make all the money they make from serving as producers on films and TV shows -- as well as banning packaging fees.
Packaging fees involve agencies getting payments that come out of a show or a film's budget. Writers say that the agencies have two big conflicts of interest: taking packaging fees and functioning as producers. The Guild argues that these get in the way of agents fighting for the interests of their clients.
The rhetoric on both sides has been heated. ATA executive director Karen Stuart accused the Writers Guild today of not arguing in good faith, and said in a statement yesterday that writers were trying to throw the industry into chaos. Stuart said today that the WGA won't make a deal until the last minute.
The WGA's last deal with the movie studios wasn't agreed upon until less than an hour before the previous agreement expired, Variety notes.
Meanwhile, the Writers Guild said yesterday that the agencies had ignored their proposals.
"We hope to make a deal before expiration, but we won't be intimidated by another threat from the agencies," the WGA said in a statement. "Their 'your Guild won't negotiate' stance is a calculated negotiating ploy, but it will not substitute for serious conversation about the damage inflicted on writers by conflicted practices. We stand ready to talk."
Almost 800 TV showrunners and screenwriters signed on to a statement of support last week, and that number's grown to more than 800. J.J. Abrams issued his own belated statement, signing on today, saying that he'd "missed my opportunity" to sign last week, but that he wouldn't miss his chance to vote yes. He encouraged others to do the same.
The Writers Guild has had their current deal in place with agents since 1976. They gave the agencies a one-year notification that they wanted to negotiate something new last year, and now that time is almost here.
We'll know what's happening a week from Sunday.
Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated Karen Stuart's title. LAist regrets the error.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.