Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Robin Thicke & Pharrell Owe $7.3 Million For Ripping Off Marvin Gaye With 'Blurred Lines'

williams-thicke.jpg
Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke performing together at a pre-Grammys gala in 2014 (Photo by Larry Busacca/Getty Images for NARAS)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The verdict is in on the "Blurred Lines" case, and a jury found today that Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams ripped off Marvin Gaye's track, "Got to Give Up." The musicians will have to pony up $7.3 million to the Gaye family.

The family sued Thicke, Williams and T.I. (a.k.a. Clifford Harris Jr.) for copying their father's 1977 song in their 2013 mega-hit, "Blurred Lines." They'll have to shell out $4 million in copyright damages, in addition to the profits they made from stealing the song, which was $1.8 million for Thicke and $1.6 million for Williams, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

"Blurred Lines" was a profitable song that sold more than 7.3 million copies and made more than $16 million in profits. The Gaye family originally sued for $25 million.

Williams was credited for writing most of "Blurred Lines," according to ABC News. He recorded it with Thicke and later added a rap part from T.I. Thicke said in court that although he received credit for the song, he wasn't actually there when Williams wrote it.

Jurors listened to the two tracks side by side and to eight days' worth of testimonies. Williams testified in court that he tried to recreate the "'70s feeling" from Gaye's music, and that the feel isn't the same as infringement.

According to Variety, when Williams had to listen to the bass lines from the two songs, he said, "It sounds like you’re playing the same thing."

Gaye's daughter, Nona Gaye, said after the verdict: "Right now, I feel free. Free from ... Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's chains and what they tried to keep on us and the lies that were told."

Sponsored message

Here's a comparison of the two songs on YouTube:

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today