Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts and Entertainment

Robin Thicke & Pharrell Owe $7.3 Million For Ripping Off Marvin Gaye With 'Blurred Lines'

Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke performing together at a pre-Grammys gala in 2014 (Photo by Larry Busacca/Getty Images for NARAS)
Before you
Dear reader, we're asking you to help us keep local news available for all. Your financial support keeps our stories free to read, instead of hidden behind paywalls. We believe when reliable local reporting is widely available, the entire community benefits. Thank you for investing in your neighborhood.

The verdict is in on the "Blurred Lines" case, and a jury found today that Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams ripped off Marvin Gaye's track, "Got to Give Up." The musicians will have to pony up $7.3 million to the Gaye family.

The family sued Thicke, Williams and T.I. (a.k.a. Clifford Harris Jr.) for copying their father's 1977 song in their 2013 mega-hit, "Blurred Lines." They'll have to shell out $4 million in copyright damages, in addition to the profits they made from stealing the song, which was $1.8 million for Thicke and $1.6 million for Williams, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

"Blurred Lines" was a profitable song that sold more than 7.3 million copies and made more than $16 million in profits. The Gaye family originally sued for $25 million.

Williams was credited for writing most of "Blurred Lines," according to ABC News. He recorded it with Thicke and later added a rap part from T.I. Thicke said in court that although he received credit for the song, he wasn't actually there when Williams wrote it.

Support for LAist comes from

Jurors listened to the two tracks side by side and to eight days' worth of testimonies. Williams testified in court that he tried to recreate the "'70s feeling" from Gaye's music, and that the feel isn't the same as infringement.

According to Variety, when Williams had to listen to the bass lines from the two songs, he said, "It sounds like you’re playing the same thing."

Gaye's daughter, Nona Gaye, said after the verdict: "Right now, I feel free. Free from ... Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's chains and what they tried to keep on us and the lies that were told."

Here's a comparison of the two songs on YouTube: