Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

Criminal Justice

LA County's Inspector General Raises Concerns With Sheriff's Department Conduct

Several Black people are seen at a protest against the shooting of Dijon Kizzee by a sheriff's deputy. One woman is holding a smart phone, another woman in a white tank top is holding a microphone. A woman wears a mask that reads BLACK LIVES MATTER and a t-shirt that reads BLACK LIVES MATTER PERIOD.
Dijon Kizzee's family members hold onto Sheila Jackson as she tells gathered protestors what his death means to them.
(
Chava Sanchez
/
LAist
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today. 

A new report from L.A. County's inspector general raises concerns about the Sheriff's Department's response to a press conference put on by protesters to decry alleged mistreatment by deputies.

The event, hosted by the National Lawyers Guild in September 2020, took place in a South L.A. parking lot to provide a "public forum" for people who said they had been mistreated by deputies while protesting the killing of Dijon Kizzee, who deputies fatally shot the previous month.

At the press conference, deputies showed up in riot gear. A Sheriff's Department spokesperson told the L.A. Times the manager of a business in the area asked them to clear the crowd out of the parking lot.

But Inspector General Max Huntsman says he found no evidence to support that claim.

Support for LAist comes from

He said he could not find any documentation of a complaint from a business owner. And the parking lot in question is in front of the Department of Probation, which belongs to the county.

"It's important that government gives factually accurate information to the public at all times," Huntsman said. "And that's especially true with law enforcement."

In a statement, the Sheriff's department refuted those claims and doubled down on its claim that a manager from a nearby business requested assistance to remove individuals away so they wouldn't interrupt business hours.

"Because the manager asked to remain anonymous, we did not obtain any further information," the statement said.

Cynthia Anderson-Barker with the National Lawyers Guild says there should be more transparency about the department's conduct in such situations.

"The Inspector General has made that happen by highlighting this incident, which is emblematic of how Sheriff Villanueva runs his department and hides wrongdoing," Anderson-Barker said.

The Inspector General's report also notes several deputies who responded to the news conference were not wearing nameplates or identification numbers, which state law requires.

Support for LAist comes from

But the Sheriff's Department claims the threat of doxing prompted the response team to remove name displays from their uniforms and helmets. Still, the department says they "utilized a numbering system specific to each squad for identification purposes" at the time.

"Since this incident the Sheriff's Response Team had name tape and helmets stickers made with badge numbers to be worn on the front of the helmet and the front of the vest," the Sheriff's Department said.

Huntsman points out his job is not to discover whether a violation of rights occurred. His office exists to conduct independent fact-finding of the government and inform the public about what's going on.

"And so the way in which this happened is of concern," Huntsman said. "And it's part of a series of actions by the sheriff's department, under this administration that [is] particularly concerning."

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist