Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Captain Says LAPD Demoted Him for Reporting Excessive Force By Police During George Floyd Protests
Photo illustration of last year's protests in L.A.
(
Chava Sanchez
/
LAist
)
An LAPD captain has filed a whistleblower lawsuit that claims he was demoted for warning Chief Michel Moore and other superiors that officers were using excessive force during the protests that erupted last year after George Floyd’s murder.
Capt. Johnny Smith also claims he was demoted for telling commanders that the department’s body camera policy makes it too easy for officers to leave their cameras off.
Neither the LAPD nor City Attorney’s office would comment on the lawsuit. It is their policy to not comment on pending litigation.
The lawsuit states Smith disclosed to his commanding officers that officers were using bean bag shotguns "unlawfully by targeting and shooting demonstrators as individuals, including media, that were not threatening any individuals or property, but were peacefully protesting." Verbal threats of violence and mere non-compliance by a demonstrator do not alone justify the use of bean bag shotguns "because the use of the round could cause serious injury," the suit adds.
Support for LAist comes from
Smith also demanded that the department investigate the shootings as being unlawful and an excessive use of force, "but was counseled by his commanding officers to 'let it be.' Consequently, no appropriate investigation was initiated," according to the lawsuit.
Echoes Of Other Excessive Force Lawsuits
The allegations in part echo those in a class action lawsuit filed by people who took to the streets to protest Floyd’s murder. It claims the LAPD brutally used hard foam projectiles and batons on people who were peacefully exercising their First Amendment rights. A similar suit has been filed against the Sheriff’s Department.
Three reports that examined how the LAPD handled the protests mostly blamed poor planning, training, and leadership. One said there was disarray among the department’s command staff.
The lawsuit filed by Smith says he was demoted from Captain III, the highest-ranking captain, to a Captain I in Dec. 2020 for also raising concerns about the department’s body-worn camera policy. It claims Smith told superiors that officers were regularly failing to properly activate their body cams, including during "many categorical uses of force."
In 2015, when the LAPD began using body worn cameras, the department issued a policy that requires officers to activate their cameras prior to initiating any investigation or enforcement activity involving a member of the public.
Smith’s lawsuit states the department has since "initiated a policy that intentionally provided an 'out' for officers if they reported in their logs that exigent circumstances prohibited them from turning on their cameras," according to the suit. "Because of the ambiguity of [the] term exigent circumstances, arguably every call could be classified as exigent," it states.
Support for LAist comes from
The suit also claims there has been a "total lack of auditing" of officers' use of body cams, and as a result, reports to the Police Commission on the rate at which officers are failing to activate their cameras have been "intentionally misleading."
In July, the department’s Inspector General issued a report that reviewed 53 use of force cases considered by the Police Commission between June 2020 and July 2021.
Of the 218 officers involved in those cases who had body cams, 22% either failed to turn them on in a timely fashion or did not turn them on at all, according to the report.
Officers have expressed mixed feelings about wearing body cams.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist