Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
SoCal Edison customers could see a rate hike as soon as next month. What you need to know

Topline:
On Thursday, state regulators are slated to decide whether to allow Southern California Edison to increase customers' rates by about 10%.
What does this mean for most people? If the plan is approved as currently written, the rate hike would go into effect Oct. 1, and regulators estimate it would add as much as $17 to the average monthly residential bill.
Why the increase? The California Public Utilities Commission states on its website that the rate increase would go toward wildfire mitigation — such as putting power lines underground and upgrades to aging equipment — as well as other grid improvements. An Edison spokesperson told LAist that the additional funds would support a more reliable electric grid and allow the company to respond to increasing threats to its system.
The timing: The rate hike comes as many ratepayers are reeling from January’s fires. Earlier this month U.S. prosecutors announced a lawsuit against Edison, alleging it was responsible for the Eaton Fire in Altadena. Investigators have yet to announce an official cause.
What’s next? The California Public Utilities Commission is expected to take up the proposed rate increase on Thursday. The meeting begins at 11 a.m. and you can watch it here. To make a public comment, you can participate by phone.
- English: (800) 857-1917, passcode: 9899501#
- Spanish: (800) 857-1917, passcode: 3799627#
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.