Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Cities Vs Big Oil: Is It A Federal Case?
A view of a Chevron refinery in Richmond, Calif. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
()
Local governments that sued big oil companies over the effects of climate change argued their case in a federal appeals court Wednesday.
It’s an unusual lawsuit – Oakland and San Francisco claim Chevron and four other large oil companies caused a public nuisance by selling their products that pollute the atmosphere with greenhouse gases.
The nuisance is climate change and the billions of dollars that Oakland and San Francisco will have to spend coping with problems like sea level rise.
“The fossil fuel companies here that are responsible for that nuisance should bear the costs for dealing with it,” said deputy city attorney Matthew Goldberg.
Support for LAist comes from
Justices of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena heard arguments over whether the case properly belongs in state court – the cities want that – or in Federal court, where the oil companies want it.
Theodore Boutrous, who argued on behalf of the oil company defendants, says the effects of global warming cross far beyond the California state line.
“You can't have 50 states and all the countries around the world having all these different pieces of litigation,” Boutrous said. “So that's why we believe these cases belong in federal court.”
The appeals court is expected to issue a decision on the proper jurisdiction of the case later this year.
GO DEEPER:
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist