Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

City Says Downtown Mural Must Go

downtown-mural.jpg
Reader submitted photo

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Not too long after city officials told a pair of Silver Lake residents that Phil Lumbang's popular "Hello!" mural must come down, a different mural in downtown's official Gallery Row neighborhood is targeted for removal today. Los Angeles artist Emmeric James Konrad's mural at the Down and Out Bar on Spring Street prompted a complaint, which alerted city officials to the illegal mural.

Although the mural was apparently commissioned by the building owner, it violates city rules. "Complicated matters, murals are currently stuck in the same rules as commercial signs," explains Ed Fuentes at blogdowntown. "Graphics that cover store windows are forbidden by those rules, which have been the subject of numerous lawsuits between the city and the signage industry in recent years."

Some people are said to be gathering to protest. "Los Angeles should not get away with defacing/ruining commissioned art (commissioned by the owner of the building) because they find it 'offensive,' wrote an LAist reader in an e-mail. "Why does no one consider the countless billboards for 'lap-band' surgery offensive? Or the ghastly electronic billboards? But yet a mural of people drinking and carousing on the exterior of a bar by a respected artist 'offensive?' Who is this panel of critics who decided this? What would these 'critics' have done to R. Crumb, to Basquiat, to Manet (Olympia was very saucy, called vulgar by conservatives in it's time)?"

What art should stay put and should go, of course, is up for debate. Lumbang's beloved mural caused a lot or protest because many enjoyed the work. Audiences on Konrad's work seem to be split. And if you remember, many hated the public art at the new LAPD headquarters and at the NoHo Arts District Gateway.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today