Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


City Fails to Produce Public Copies of Bicycle Plan at Libraries

We need to hear from you.
Today during our spring member drive, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. The local news you read here every day is crafted for you, but right now, we need your help to keep it going. In these uncertain times, your support is even more important. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership. Thank you.

Photo by GarySe7en via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr

Photo by GarySe7en via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr
The controversial Bicycle Draft Plan for Los Angeles has just earned itself another FAIL badge. As part of the vetting process for any large plan, the public is allowed to make comments after reviewing documents. Too bad the non-internet public is out of luck. Copies of the 563-page plan are supposed to be a nine designated libraries, but as Mayor Villaraigosa's Bicycle Advisory Committee appointee and current Chairperson points out, copies are no where to be found.

"Six out of eight regional libraries could not find either the Plan disc, the maps, or neither," Bailey wrote in a e-mail scolding Councilman Bill Rosendahl, who said nine copies would be placed in libraries at a December 9th bicycle transportation meeting. Even if Plan discs were available, city libraries have disabled C: drives, according to Bailey. "I have contacted each and verified that NONE have received the promised hard copy," he continued, noting Rosendahl's promise was three weeks ago.

Originally, the public comment period was through November 6th, but was extended to January 8th after complaints that the period was too short, leaving little chance for community groups and neighborhood councils time to review and provide comment.

Support for LAist comes from

"Clearly this is unacceptable for the many Angelenos who do not have high-speed internet connectivity to accommodate the downloading of such a large document or for those that don't have personal computer access," said Bailey.

It's almost like city employees do not care about the plan. Could this incompetent example of leadership within Los Angeles' bikeways office once again delay the draft plan?

Most Read