Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

City Fails to Produce Public Copies of Bicycle Plan at Libraries

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

bikeplanpubliccopiesfubar.jpg
Photo by GarySe7en via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr


Photo by GarySe7en via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr
The controversial Bicycle Draft Plan for Los Angeles has just earned itself another FAIL badge. As part of the vetting process for any large plan, the public is allowed to make comments after reviewing documents. Too bad the non-internet public is out of luck. Copies of the 563-page plan are supposed to be a nine designated libraries, but as Mayor Villaraigosa's Bicycle Advisory Committee appointee and current Chairperson points out, copies are no where to be found.

"Six out of eight regional libraries could not find either the Plan disc, the maps, or neither," Bailey wrote in a e-mail scolding Councilman Bill Rosendahl, who said nine copies would be placed in libraries at a December 9th bicycle transportation meeting. Even if Plan discs were available, city libraries have disabled C: drives, according to Bailey. "I have contacted each and verified that NONE have received the promised hard copy," he continued, noting Rosendahl's promise was three weeks ago.

Originally, the public comment period was through November 6th, but was extended to January 8th after complaints that the period was too short, leaving little chance for community groups and neighborhood councils time to review and provide comment.

"Clearly this is unacceptable for the many Angelenos who do not have high-speed internet connectivity to accommodate the downloading of such a large document or for those that don't have personal computer access," said Bailey.

It's almost like city employees do not care about the plan. Could this incompetent example of leadership within Los Angeles' bikeways office once again delay the draft plan?

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today