Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your tax-deductible donation now.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City Council Likely to Approve Contract with Arizona-Based Company for Red Light Cameras
There may be a boycott on doing business with Arizona, but the L.A. City Council appears posted to likely approve a 10-month contract extension with a company located there for enforcement of intersections with red light cameras, according to the LA Times.
The issue slated for Tuesday's City Council meeting (.pdf) puts two controversial items on one plate. Police and lawmakers see the safety benefit in the red light cameras at 32 intersections throughout Los Angeles, even if the city loses money on them, and some want to see the program expanded. At the same time, the company currently contracted to run the cameras, American Traffic Solutions, is based in Arizona and is one of the top red light camera businesses in the country.
And while the City Council would like to open up the bidding process to other companies next year, the other top industry player is Redflex Traffic Systems -- also an Arizona-based company.
Los Angeles' boycott of the state over its controversial immigration bill is not all that strict. It directed city departments to "refrain from entering into any new or amended contracts to purchase goods or services from any company that is headquartered in Arizona."
Co-author of the boycott Councilmember Ed Reyes told the Times he'll vote for the exemption, as to not put residents at a public safety risk. But he vowed to press for alternatives to Arizona-based companies when the bidding for a new contract begins next year. One of his ideas: lure a company to based itself in Los Angeles, thus creating new jobs.
Last week, plans to send four LAPD employees to a conference in Arizona was nixed.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
