Manny Ruiz strikes alongside other workers with Teamsters 2785 at Amazon Warehouse DCK6 in the Bayview District in San Francisco on Dec. 19, 2024. Amazon workers at multiple facilities across the U.S. went on strike to fight for a union contract.
(
Jungho Kim for CalMatters
)
Topline:
Under a law taking effect Jan. 1, California seeks to uphold the labor and unionization rights of private-sector employees, as the federal agency that has held that power for decades is in limbo.
Where things stand: The new law’s future is unclear because the Trump administration is challenging it.
Why now: The law, which grants more powers to the California Public Employment Relations Board, is a response to the National Labor Relations Board lacking a quorum. President Donald Trump fired the NLRB’s chairperson, Gwynne Wilcox, days after he began his second term in January. His two nominees to the board have yet to be confirmed, so the federal board has been without the three members it needs for a quorum for months.
California under a law taking effect today seeks to uphold the labor and unionization rights of private-sector employees, as the federal agency that has held that power for decades is in limbo.
But the new law’s future is unclear because the Trump administration is challenging it.
The law, which grants more powers to the California Public Employment Relations Board, is a response to the National Labor Relations Board lacking a quorum.
President Donald Trump fired the NLRB’s chairperson, Gwynne Wilcox, days after he began his second term in January. His two nominees to the board have yet to be confirmed, so the federal board has been without the three members it needs for a quorum for months.
Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, the Inglewood Democrat who wrote the bill, said when the governor signed it in September that “California will not sit idly as its workers are systematically denied the right to organize due to employer intransigence or federal inaction.”
The NLRB sued California over the law in October, saying in its lawsuit that the state is trying to assert authority over “areas explicitly reserved for federal oversight.”
On the legal challenge to the law, Terry Schanz, McKinnor’s chief of staff, referred CalMatters to the state attorney general. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office is responsible for defending the law in court. A spokesperson for Bonta said the office would have nothing to say about it.
With the NLRB unable to fulfill its duties, states are trying to fill the gap in enforcing the National Labor Relations Act, which Congress passed in 1935. But labor experts contacted by CalMatters do not have high hopes for the California law, which is similar to a law passed in New York this year. They said courts, including the Supreme Court, have ruled that states cannot decide matters pertaining to federal labor law because of preemption, the doctrine that a higher authority of law overrides a lower authority.
“It’s difficult to imagine a scenario where the courts do not overturn these (state) laws,” said John Logan, professor and chairperson of Labor and Employment Studies at San Francisco State University.
William Gould, a former chairperson of the National Labor Relations Board during the Clinton administration and a professor emeritus at Stanford University, agreed: “In the courts the matter is a dead letter unless (the Supreme Court) shifts gears.”
That’s what the California and U.S. chambers of commerce, along with other business groups, are hoping, according to their amicus brief in support of the Trump administration’s lawsuit against California: “Under California’s view, every state could have its own labor law for private-sector workers. Dozens of laws would overlap and collide.”
The California Labor Federation, an umbrella organization for unions that represents about 2 million California workers, said in an amicus brief that even before Trump fired the NLRB chief, the federal agency’s backlog had been a problem, leading to companies being able to delay bargaining in good faith with their employees’ unions without consequences.
If the California law is overturned, employees who have formed unions but have not succeeded in securing contracts with employers such as Amazon and Starbucks — which are among the companies seeking to have the NLRB declared unconstitutional — may continue to face delays, according to Logan. Or, he said, it’s not clear what would happen if other workers tried to organize and their companies simply fired them.
“The NLRB defunctness is a scandal which cries out for political reform,” Gould said.
Downtown L.A. will see highs around 75 degrees today.
(
Mel Melcon
/
Getty Images
)
QUICK FACTS
Today’s weather: Morning clouds then sunny
Beaches: around 70 degrees
Mountains: Mid 60s at lower elevations
Inland: 67 to 74 degrees
Warnings and advisories: None
What to expect: A slightly cooler period compared to last week in which high temps today won't surpass the 80s. Windy conditions are in store throughout the week.
Read on ... for more details.
QUICK FACTS
Today’s weather: Morning clouds then sunny
Beaches: around 70 degrees
Mountains: Mid 60s at lower elevations
Inland: 67 to 74 degrees
Warnings and advisories: None
Some breezy conditions will linger this morning, but otherwise we're looking at a slightly cooler day.
The warmest area today will be the Coachella Valley, where temperatures will reach 75 to 80 degrees.
Elsewhere, we should stay under 80 degrees today across the region. The beaches will remain around the low to mid 70s, up to 75 degrees for coastal Orange County. Most L.A. County valleys, the Inland Empire and inland Orange County will hover in the mid to upper 70s.
The coolest areas today will be the Santa Clarita Valley, where temperatures there will be from 64 to 71 degrees, and the Antelope Valley where temperatures will range from 58 to 86 degrees.
Liberty Park on Wilshire Boulevard in Koreatown will host two viewing parties for the FIFA World Cup.
(
Brian Feinzimer
/
The LA Local
)
Topline:
Koreatown will be a bit crowded in June as thousands of fans gather for multiple FIFA World Cup watch parties.
Why now: Organizers from local Korean groups announced Wednesday the schedule of events as the South Korean team is set to play in three games in Mexico on June 11, 18 and 24.
More details: Viewing parties for the June 11 opener and the June 24 match where South Korea will take on South Africa will be held at Liberty Park in Koreatown. Organizers estimate 1,500 to 2,000 attendees and will close off Serrano Avenue next to the park to accommodate food trucks. A large LED screen showing the game will face Wilshire Boulevard, with sponsor booths lining the street.
Read on... for more about the viewing parties in K-town.
Koreatown will be a bit crowded in June as thousands of fans gather for multiple FIFA World Cup watch parties.
Organizers from local Korean groups announced Wednesday the schedule of events as the South Korean team is set to play in three games in Mexico on June 11, 18 and 24.
Viewing parties for the June 11 opener and the June 24 match where South Korea will take on South Africa will be held at Liberty Park in Koreatown. Organizers estimate 1,500 to 2,000 attendees and will close off Serrano Avenue next to the park to accommodate food trucks. A large LED screen showing the game will face Wilshire Boulevard, with sponsor booths lining the street.
Although kickoff for the games that will be broadcast in the evening, programming will start at 2 p.m. with performances and other activities at Liberty Park.
Event organizers include the Korean American Federation of Los Angeles, the LA Korean Festival Foundation, and the Korean American Chamber of Commerce.
The June 18 game against Mexico is projected to draw 2,000 to 3,000 attendees, organizers said. Duha Hwang with event organizer Advue said they plan to shut down Normandie Avenue along the same stretch used for the LA Korean Festival at Seoul International Park.
Programming for the Mexico match will start at 10 a.m. and run as an all-day event, Hwang said.
“This will likely be the biggest game of the group stage for our neighborhood,” Hwang said. “Koreatown is home not only to Korean Americans but to many different communities. We want this to be a joint celebration, where both Korean and Mexican communities come together to support their teams.”
South Korea’s opponent for the June 11 game will be determined after European league play concludes later this spring. They could play against Czechia, Denmark, North Macedonia or the Republic of Ireland.
Inglewood is one of several North American host cities for this year’s games, but South Korea will be playing their matches in Mexico.
Hwang said this year is especially meaningful, given the World Cup is being held in North America for the first time since 1994.
“In 2002, many of us were in Korea cheering on the national team. Now, the World Cup is being held here, on the continent where we live. Being able to cheer for Team Korea here at home makes this moment particularly significant,” Hwang said.
Organizers acknowledged parking will be limited and encouraged attendees to use public transit or rideshare services. Hwang said they will look into plans to operate shuttle buses.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Julia Barajas
is following the impact of President Trump's immigration policies on Southern California communities.
Published March 5, 2026 5:00 AM
Born and raised in Downey, Victor Correa created a community watch program after witnessing an attempted immigration raid on his block.
(
Carlin Stiehl
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Earlier this year, Victor Correa spotted masked men trying to force two gardeners into an unmarked SUV in the city of Downey. He recorded the scene with his phone, demanding to know why the men were being taken. The experience left Correa wanting to do more to protect his community.
Why it matters: One of the gardeners said federal agents did not give them a chance to prove they have work authorizations. They expressed gratitude to Downey residents for standing up for them and credited the bystanders for enabling them to return to their families.
Launching a community watch program: A few weeks later, Correa co-founded Downey ICE Watch to train his neighbors on what their rights are when filming federal agents in public and how to record useful footage.
What's next: Downey ICE Watch continues to train local residents. Their next meeting will take place March 25 at Downey Memorial Christian Church.
On a tranquil morning in January, Victor Correa had a vision for the day: Breakfast burritos from La Azteca Tortillería, and, later, a wedding he’d attend with his wife and their 2-year-old daughter.
The sky was bright blue when he set out for breakfast from his home in the city of Downey.
But Correa didn’t get far — just down the block, he witnessed a scene that’s played out more and more across the country this past year: masked men hopping out of unmarked cars to haul away Latino workers.
Correa grabbed his phone and started recording from his car. In videos he shared with LAist, men with dark sunglasses — one with a Border Patrol uniform and one in plainclothes — questioned two gardeners while other masked men stood watch from black SUVs nearby.
One of the men pointed what appeared to be a pepper gun at Correa and commanded him to move his car.
“Don’t fuckin’ shoot me!” he shouted at the federal agent. “I’m not fuckin’ doin’ nothin’!”
Correa honked and hurried to park. “ICE! ICE is here!” he yelled. By the time he made it back to the scene, one of the gardeners had already been taken inside a black Chevy Tahoe.
With urgency in his voice, Correa asked the remaining worker for his name in Spanish.
“José Solorio,” the man managed to say as an agent grappled him.
Soon, other neighbors emerged. They too began to record. One called out for a number to contact Solorio’s family: “¡Número de teléfono, jefe! ¡Número de teléfono!”
A woman in a floral bathrobe walked up and began scolding the agents. Amid the fray, the gardener inside the SUV appeared to let himself out. Then, the agents drove off.
“Get the fuck out of here!” Correa shouted after them.
Footage from one of the videos captured by Victor Correa on Jan. 10, 2026.
“I told myself that if I ever saw something like that, that I would be ready,” he told LAist. “And so, when my moment came, I was ready. And I let out all my rage.”
“I apologize to all the abuelas out there for all the cursing,” he said.
'What I hope everybody would do'
After the agents left, Correa said, he, the gardeners and neighbors unwound. According to Correa, the man who exited the SUV after being detained talked about trying to show proof that he’s in the U.S. legally to one of the agents, “but they wouldn’t listen."
The man also tried to show it to Correa, who shook his head and waved him away, he said.
“You don't have to show me anything," Correa recalled saying.
He said he "just did what I hope everybody would do."
Born and raised in Downey, Victor Correa created a community watch program after witnessing an attempted immigration raid on his block.
(
Carlin Stiehl
/
LAist
)
The experience left Correa wanting to do more to protect his community from further raids. He teamed up with City Councilman Mario Trujillo to found Downey ICE Watch. For their first meeting in January, they invited Unión del Barrio, an organization with decades of experience in community patrol, to teach attendees how to spot immigration agents. The group also distributed whistles, a tool that’s become symbolic of community resistance to federal immigration agents. That Tuesday night, Correa said proudly, over 100 people showed up.
Keeping bystanders safe — or as safe as possible — was and continues to be top of mind, he added. Days before Downey ICE Watch’s first meeting, federal agents shot and killed another bystander, Alex Pretti, in Minneapolis.
Looking back on his encounter with federal agents, Correa said that, in hindsight, he would strive to be “a little less aggressive.”
“I would still go out there and record and blow whistles,” he added, “but I would not [get] as close, because I have a family, I have a daughter. And these guys seem to be getting away with murder.”
Meeting neighbors, forming community
In February, Correa held a second meeting for his group at Downey Christian Memorial Church. Last summer, when the Trump administration began its militarized deportation effort in Southern California, armed agents detained a man in the church’s parking lot. When faith leaders asked the agents to identify themselves, they said one of the officers pointed a gun at its senior pastor, Rev. Tanya Lopez.
As local residents entered the church’s multipurpose room for the Downey ICE Watch meeting, Correa and other organizers had them sit with people who live in their part of the city. Correa said this would help locals mingle with their neighbors, creating a sense of camaraderie that’s essential to community patrol work.
About 50 people attended. The multi-ethnic audience listened closely as Rev. Lopez encouraged them to join her interfaith immigration court observer program. Immigration attorneys talked about cases they’re working on, about the families they’re fighting to keep from being separated.
Interested in joining Downey ICE Watch?
The group’s next meeting will take place on March 25, 2026 at Downey Memorial Christian Church.
Local attorney Alfonso Morales thought it important to talk about cases where he’s been successful, including the release of two men who were detained during a warrantless raid at a car wash in San Dimas.
He also offered guidance for bystanders who film federal agents in public spaces.
“Don't interfere,” he told them. “You're there to record and document.”
Morales encouraged them to describe what they witness: “Narrate. Talk about the place, the time, how many officers, how many vehicles, the license plate — all of that is public information.”
“Make sure people know where you are,” he added. “And keep a full copy of the video.”
Morales acknowledged that this type of work can take a toll on one’s mental health.
“I now have a therapist,” he shared. “Seeing people taken on a daily basis, when you know the law, and you know the law should be on your side—it’s painful.”
Still, federal immigration agents “need to know people are watching,” Morales said. “And that history will not forget.”
Correa wrapped up the February meeting with a presentation from other community groups, BarrioPower and Siempre Unidos LA.
Rosa Vazquez, who co-founded BarrioPower last summer, stressed that, if local residents do not feel comfortable participating in community patrols, they can still help their neighbors. Community members, for instance, can deliver groceries to those who are too scared to leave their homes, or volunteer to drive their neighbors’ children to school.
“When the world feels like it's crumbling around us every single day,” she said, “the only way to overcome the despair that is natural for us to feel is to take action.”
One week after the FBI searched the home and office of Los Angeles Unified Superintendent Alberto Carvalho, there are few public details about the justification for the search and the underlying investigation. LAist talked to legal experts to understand why.
The backstory: The reason for the searches is unknown. A DOJ spokesperson said the agency has a court-authorized warrant but declined to provide additional details. The FBI told our media partner CBS LA that the underlying affidavit remained under court-ordered seal.
Justification for secrecy: A retired FBI special agent and former federal prosecutor told LAist it’s “not uncommon” for a judge to agree to restrict the public’s view of a search warrant affidavit while an investigation is ongoing. “They could be concerned about people fleeing or covering up evidence or other efforts to obstruct the investigation,” said Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School. It could also mean prosecutors are working with witnesses or informants who they don’t want to compromise, she said.
LAUSD reaction: The district published a statement last week acknowledging the presence of law enforcement at its headquarters and the superintendent’s home and said it is “cooperating with the investigation, and we do not have further information at this time." The LAUSD board voted unanimously Friday to place Carvalhoon paid administrative leave “pending investigation,”and appointed longtime administrator Andres Chait as acting superintendent.
One week after the FBI searched the home and office of Superintendent Alberto Carvalho, leader of the Los Angeles Unified School District, there are few public details about the justification for the searches and the underlying investigation.
The reason for the searches is still unknown. A Department of Justice spokesperson said the agency has a court-authorized warrant but declined to provide additional details. The FBI told our media partner CBS LA that the underlying affidavit remained under court-ordered seal.
“Stay tuned,” said Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School. “This is just the beginning on a case like this. [The searches are] a major development, but the fact that they still have this under seal seems to suggest it's ongoing.”
Neighbors told LAist that agents in unmarked cars arrived at Carvalho’s San Pedro home early on the morning of Feb. 25.Agents searched the district’s headquarters, as well as a home in South Florida, which the FBI said was connected to the investigation.
LAist talked to Levenson, a former federal prosecutor, as well as Kenneth Gray, a retired FBI special agent and University of New Haven criminal justice professor, to understand why the search warrant and the affidavit have been shielded from public view. Gray and Levenson spoke based on their experience in the field, not on any insider knowledge of the investigation involving Carvalho.
What’s in the affidavit?
An affidavit is a sworn document that lays out details of a case — and the underlying reason why law enforcement believes in the need for a search warrant.
”You build a case in your affidavit, that you have reason to believe you have probable cause that a crime has been committed and that there is evidence to be found at a specific location,” Gray said. It usually contains information that federal agents have learned themselves or information that others have told them, he said.
Gray and Levenson told LAist it’s “not uncommon” for a judge to agree to restrict the public’s view of an affidavit while an investigation is ongoing. “They could be concerned about people fleeing or covering up evidence or other efforts to obstruct the investigation,” Levenson said.
It could also mean prosecutors are working with witnesses or informants they don’t want to compromise — or on an issue of national security.
“ I would not read into the fact that it is sealed that it means a specific thing because there are many different reasons why,” Gray said.
What’s in a search warrant?
A search warrant typically includes:
The address and descriptors of the place to be searched
A list of items to seize. This may be specific or general, i.e. books, documents, calendars
Levenson said if the investigation is concluded and there are formal charges in the case, it’s likely the affidavits will become unsealed. But it’s also possible it will remain hidden from public view if the investigation is ongoing. “There can be so many offshoots of the case,” she said.
And when do charges usually happen after a search? Levenson said it could be weeks.
“It’s really impossible to guess because we don’t know how widespread this investigation is,” she said. It’s possible charges are never filed.
It’s also possible the search warrant may become public before the affidavit, the latter of which contains more information about the case the prosecutors are trying to build.
“Depending on the type of case, the search warrant usually is something revealed early on,” Gray said. “But the affidavit itself is not [revealed] until it goes to court.”
Gray said the target of the search typically is left with a copy of the warrant and a receipt of the property taken. The receipt also is filed with the court and the evidence stored in an FBI locker, Gray said.
Will there be criminal charges?
The Department of Justice has not publicly charged Carvalho with wrongdoing. Carvalho has made no public statement since the searches.
“Not every case ends up being provable,” Gray said. He acknowledged the media’s right to report on searches but said there can be consequences.
“Sometimes the end result is that people's reputations are damaged when information like this is revealed that has not been proven,” Gray said.
Who are all these unnamed sources?
Several media outlets have published information not provided publicly, such as the existence of grand jury subpoenas for people connected to the Florida school district Carvalho once led.
LAist contacted Miami-Dade County Public Schools for comment. The district referred our request to the media relations department and its lawyers but has not yet provided any information.
Typically, a newsroom or media outlet has best practices for gathering the information found in stories.
Journalists who focus on a specific topic or geography may develop professional relationships with people or sources who are willing to share information that is not otherwise public.
At LAist, we seek information from people who know the facts “first-hand” — there’s no one between the information we’re seeking and the source.
How to reach LAist
If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is @ellyyu.89.
You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
For instructions on getting started with Signal, see the app's support page.
We use unnamed or anonymous sources as a primary source of information as a last resort because we believe readers and listeners should know where the information in our stories comes from. However, there are some cases where we use confidential sources. For example, when they are the only ones who can provide understanding central to the story.
“Under no circumstances do we allow personal attacks by someone unnamed in our reporting,” read LAist’s standards of practice. “In most circumstances, information from unnamed sources needs to be corroborated by a second credible person, document, tape, or video that is independent of the original source.”