Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Carson's 'Green' Power Plant Gets the Red Light

PowerPlant_smokestacks.jpg
Photo by lady_lbrty via Flickr

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Plans to build a $1 billion power plant in Carson--touted by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as the "cleanest and greenest" in the nation when it was announced in 2006--have just recently been "quietly abandoned," the Contra Costa Times reports, citing "inhospitable" ecological conditions at the proposed site, and "resistance from local environmentalists."The resistance is characterized as a split between groups considered to be "mainstream" environmentalist organizations, and those categorized as working for "environmental justice." The desire to focus on green energy and to continue to make California a leader in green-collar jobs and technology was eclipsed by those opposed, who feared potential carbon dioxide leakage from the proposed underground storage as part of the plant's use of carbon-capture technology.

The Carson plant was to be a team effort between BP America and Edison International, set up next to the current BP Carson refinery, and "would have used leftover petroleum coke to generate electricity" with "the resulting carbon dioxide [...] sold to Occidental Petroleum, which would pump it into the ground to improve oil recovery." But Occidental backed out, noting that the proposed land "was not amenable to a flood of carbon dioxide," and not because of any opposition.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today