With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Bruce Family To Sell Beach Back To LA County For $20 Million — Months After Return Of Oceanfront Land Seized Nearly 100 Years Ago
Artist Shelley Bruce paints a painting of the Bruce family during a ceremony transferring the ownership of Bruce's Beach to the descendants of the Black family who had the land seized from them through eminent domain in 1927. The family will not exercise a clause selling the land to L.A. County for nearly $20 million.
(
Patrick T. Fallon
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
L.A. County officials said Tuesday that the Bruce family will sell Bruce's Beach to the county for nearly $20 million — a decision that came months after the valuable property was returned to descendants of the original owners nearly a century after it was seized.
Supervisor Janice Hahn, in a statement, said the nearly $20 million was the "estimated value of the property."
A Brief History
The plot is located in Manhattan Beach between 26th and 27th Streets. In the early 1900s, a prominent Black family owned the property and provided Bruce's Beach guests with towels, changing rooms, snacks and even bathing suits for rent. It was a popular spot where Black Angelenos could enjoy the ocean front.
Support for LAist comes from
Then city officials seized it from owners Willa and Charles Bruce through eminent domain in 1924. At the time, the city claimed they needed the property to build a park but the land sat undeveloped for decades. After three years of fighting it, in 1927 the Bruce family was forced out.
Read more: How Bruce's Beach Was Stolen From The Black Family That Owned It — And How They Got It Back
Reparations
Hahn, whose district includes the South Bay, advocated for the beach to be returned to the Bruce family beginning in 2020. Liz Odendahl, a spokesperson for Hahn’s office, said the supervisor sees this action as a form of reparations and would like to see it replicated.
Support for LAist comes from
“She hopes that Bruce’s Beach is a model,” said Odendahl. “Undoubtedly there are other stories, just like Bruce's Beach, where land was improperly taken from Black families, and governments can return that property to the descendants of those who were wronged.”
Odendahl added that it was “certainly possible” that Bruce’s Beach could serve as a model for land return to Native Americans as well.
About The Handoff Last Summer
At a handoff ceremony last summer, Chief Duane Yellow Feather Shepard, a descendant of the Bruce family, called the decades-long fight not just a victory for the family, but for all those who are "oppressed in this country."
"It took all of us here, and all of us out there, standing toe to toe with racism and beating it down. Power to the right people," he said.
At the time of the ceremony, the Bruce family planned to lease the property back to the county but indicated a future sale was possible.
Support for LAist comes from
The $20 Million Clause
The transfer agreement reached included a two-year lease agreement at a rate of $413,000 each year. That agreement also included a potential sale of the property back to the county "within a certain timeframe... for a purchase price not to exceed $20 million."
"The purchase price has been confirmed by appraisals to be equivalent to or less than fair market value," the agreement said.
The city of Manhattan Beach still owns a park associated with Bruce’s Beach, but that land was not owned by the Bruce family, and so is not part of the sale.
George Fatheree, an attorney representing the Bruce family, has not yet responded to a request for comment.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails. -
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
Best of LAist