Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Transgender Man Sues Barbershop For Refusing Him Service

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Gloria Allred has filed a civil rights lawsuit on behalf of a transgender man who was denied services at a barbershop. According to the lawsuit, Rose Trevis, a transgender male, and Trevis’ domestic partner Laura Lozano were walking in Long Beach on March 4 when they came upon Hawleywood’s Barber Shop & Shaving Parlor. Hawleywood’s was open for business, and Trevis decided he wanted to get a haircut.

He was told that Hawleywood’s only provided services to customers with appointments, so Trevis asked if there were any available that day. The barber then stared at Trevis, as if he was examining his appearance, and said “We don’t cut women’s hair,” according to the suit.

Trevis was surprised by the barber’s response. “Who says I’m a woman?” he asked.

“Like I said, we don’t cut women’s hair,” he was told. According to the suit, the barber walked to the back of the shop and summoned another employee, who proceeded to repeat the same conversation with Trevis. Trevis told the employees that refusing to provide services was discrimination, at which point the second barber told him that Hawleywood’s has “the right to refuse services to anyone,” and that they were “an old school barbershop,” and therefore did not provide services to women. When Trevis and Lozano tried to point out that the policy was illegal, the second barber said “I don’t care.”

Trevis and Lozano eventually left the shop, sans haircut. “I was greeted and denied services due to my gender and on account of what the barbers perceived to be my gender,” Trevis said in a statement. “I felt humiliated, discriminated against and frowned upon.”

On its website, Hawleywood’s describes itself as a “men’s sanctuary,” writing the “one thing you won’t see at Hawleywood’s is women. You all know how distracting a woman can be and who wants a straight razor shave with a buxom blonde in the joint?”

Allred’s suit alleges discrimination based on gender and perceived gender, in violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. She is also seeking an injunction mandating that the barbershop eliminate its gender-discrimination policy.

Sponsored message

“It is 2016 and neither Rose nor I will tolerate the type of discrimination that [he] was forced to suffer,” Allred wrote in a statement.

Hawleywood’s website says that entering the barbershop “feels like stepping into a timewarp,” and it seems that the statement unfortunately applies to more than just the vintage waiting chairs and the old-fashioned two-tone brown floors.

Update 6:01 p.m.: LAist has received a statement from Bryan R. Kazarian, general counsel for Hawleywood's, who alleges that no discrimination occurred:


We are informed and believe that a customer entered our establishment and requested an appointment for a haircut on a "walk-in" basis at the above date and location. An appointment was scheduled for a time the next business day. Hawleywood's is not aware of any discrimination that has been alleged to have taken place. Moreover, Hawleywood's takes accusations of any law violations very seriously and will continue to investigate the facts and circumstances that surround this alleged incident.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today